EXTRACORPOREAL ULTRASOUND EXPOSURE BY AMPLITUDE-MODULATED SIGNAL FOR PREVENTION OF INCRUSATION OF URETERAL STENTS IN A CHRONIC EXPERIMENT


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Ureteral stents are widely used as drainage for the upper urinary tract. Incrustation and biofilm formation are the most dangerous complications of this type of drainage, leading to its failure. None of the existing methods completely solve the problem of preventing these complications. Purpose of the study: to assess the effectiveness and safety of the usage of extracorporeal acoustic exposure by ultrasonic amplitude-modulated signal for the prevention of incrustation of ureteral stents in a chronic experiment. Materials and methods. A team of authors calculated, designed and manufactured an ultrasonic generator, the main principle of which is the generation of an amplitude-modulated ultrasonic signal. 10 somatically healthy mongrel dogs without urinary tract infections were included in the experiment. Bilateral ureteral stenting was performed on the animals. Standard polyurethane stents 5CH were used. Starting from the 7th day of the postoperative period, ureteral stents were extracorporeally affected by the amplitude-modulated ultrasonic signal in their projection, leaving the contralateral stents intact. On the 28th day of the experiment, the stents were removed, the weight of each of them was measured, and their surface was examined by scanning electron and atomic force microscopy. Morphological examinations of the ureters and descending part of the colon on the side of the acoustic impact were carried out. Results. No complications in the postoperative period were observed. After extraction, the average weight of the sonicated stent was 0.5711±0.0264 g, the intact one - 0.6218±0.0296 g (p - 0.0022497). The surface of the new stent has thin rows of small technological defects revealed by scanning electron and atomic force microscopy. On the surface of the sonicated stent, salt deposits are noted, but this array is loose, fragmentarily repeating the technological shading of the new stent. On an intact one stent, striation is lost, formations of a rough monolithic structure with massive relief defects are visible. Atomic force microscopy: the height of technological irregularities on the surface of the new stent was 0.15±0.02 qm; on the sonicated stent, the average height of salt deposits was 0.2382±0.0988 μm, with an average maximum of peaks - 0.8564±0.5013 μm. On an intact stent, the average height reached 1.2470±0.6559 μm, and the average maximum of peaks was 3.1021±1.3844 μm. Histological examination: the severe of damage to the urothelium in both groups was comparable. The revealed changes did not worsen by exposure of amplitude-modulated ultrasonic signal. The hypertrophy of muscle fibers was noted in the sonicated ureteral wall. These findings are explained by the reflex increasing of peristalsis during vibration of a foreign body in the lumen of the ureter by the exposure of ultrasound. Morphological manifestations of traumatic damage to the colon were not revealed. Conclusions. Extracorporeal ultrasound exposure by amplitude-modulated signal is an effective and safe way to prevent incrustation of ureteral stents, which requires further study and adaptation to clinical practice.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. Yu Tsukanov

Omsk State Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: autt@mail.ru
Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Head of Department of Surgical Diseases and Urology of postgraduate education Omsk, Russia

D. S Akhmetov

Omsk State Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: dsahmetov99@gmail.com
postgraduate of Department of Surgical Diseases and Urology of postgraduate education Omsk, Russia

A. A Novikov

Omsk State Technical University Ministry of Education and Science of Russia

Email: yarus952@mail.ru
Dr. Tech. Sci., Professor of Department of Engineering and materials science Omsk, Russia

D. A Negrov

Omsk State Technical University Ministry of Education and Science of Russia

Email: negrov_d_a@mail.ru
Assistant Professor, Professor of Department of Engineering and materials science Omsk, Russia

E. A Rogachev

Omsk State Technical University Ministry of Education and Science of Russia

Email: evg.rogachev@ya.ru
Assistant Professor at the Department «Physics», Head of the scientific and educational resource center of nanotechnology «Nanocenter» Omsk, Russia

S. I Mozgovoy

Omsk State Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: simozgovoy@yandex.com
Dr. Med. Sci., Professor, Assistant Professor of Pathological Anatomy Omsk, Russia

A. R Putinceva

Omsk State Technical University Ministry of Education and Science of Russia

Email: asya.mulyukova@mail.ru
postgraduate of Department of Engineering and materials science Omsk, Russia

S. D Chernov

Omsk State Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: sergeychernov2022@gmail.com
student of general medicine faculty Omsk, Russia

References

  1. Chew B.H., Emmott A., Lange D., Paterson R.F. Ureterorenoscopy: Ureteral Stents and Postoperative Care. In: Smith’s Textbook Endourology, 4 Ed. by Willey Blackwell. 2019;1:642-652.
  2. Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г. Внутреннее дренирование верхних мочевыводящих путей при опухолевых обструкциях мочеточников. Онкоурология. 2010;6(2):78-83. doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2010-6-2-78-83.
  3. Choong S., Whitfield H. Biofilms and their role in infections in urology. BJU International. 2001;86(8),935-941. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00949.x
  4. Burke J.P., Zavasky D.M. Nosocomial urinary tract infection. In Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control; Glen Mayhall, C., Ed.; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA. 1999;173-185.
  5. Foxman B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs. The American Journal of Medicine. 2002; 113(1), 5-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01054-9.
  6. Rebl H., Renner J., Kram W., et al. Prevention of Encrustation on Ureteral Stents: Which Surface Parameters Provide Guidance for the Development of Novel Stent Materials. Polymers. 2020;12(3):558. doi: 10.3390/polym12030558
  7. Warren J.W., Muncie H.L., Hebel J.R., Hall-Craggs M. Long-Term Urethral Catheterization Increases Risk of Chronic Pyelonephritis and Renal Inflammation. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1994 42(12), 1286-1290. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06513.x
  8. Tunney M.M., Jones D.S., Gorman S.P. Biofilm and biofilm-related encrustation of urinary tract devices. Methods in Enzymology. 1999; 558-566. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(99)10043-0
  9. Новиков А.Б., Сергеев В.П., Ергаков Д.В., др. Стентирование верхних мочевых путей: снизу, сверху, сбоку- Research’n Practical Medicine Journal. 2020;7(4):105-117. Doi: https://doi.org/10.17709/2409-2231-2020-7-4-9.
  10. Патент РФ на изобретение. № 2703472/17.10.2019. Бюл. № 29. Новиков А.А., Цуканов А.Ю., Ахметов Д.С. Способ неинвазивной санации мочеточниковых стентов.
  11. Цуканов А.Ю., Ахметов Д.С., Новиков А.А., Негров Д.А., Путинцева А.Р., Семикина С.П. Определение оптимальных точек экстракорпорального акустического воздействия ультразвуковым амплитудно-модулированным сигналом на мочеточниковый стент с целью профилактики его инкрустации в эксперименте. Вестник урологии. 2021;9(3):70-78. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21886/2308-6424-2021-9-3-70-78
  12. Lange D., Elwood C.N., Choi K., et al. Uropathogen interaction with the surface of urological stents using different surface properties. The Journal of Urology. 2009;182(3):1194-1200. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.008.
  13. Cadieux P.A., Chew B.H., Nott L., et al. Use of triclosan-eluting ureteral stents in patients with long-term stents. Journal of Endourology. 2009;23(7):1187-1194. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0437.
  14. Pechey A., Elwood C.N., Wignall G.R., et al. Anti-adhesive coating and clearance of device associated uropathogenic Escherichia Coli cystitis. The Journal of Urology. 2009;182(4):1628-1636. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.008.
  15. Barros A.A., Rita A., Duarte C., et al. Bioresorbable ureteral stents from natural origin polymers. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2014;103(3):608-617. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33237.
  16. Hazan Z., Zumeris J., Jacob H., et al. Effective prevention of microbial biofilm formation on medical devices by low-energy surface acoustic waves. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2006;50(12):4144-4152. doi: 10.1128/aac.00418-06.
  17. Dror N., Mandel M., Hazan Z., et al. Advances in microbial biofilm prevention on indwelling medical devices with emphasis on usage of acoustic energy. Sensors. 2009;9(4):2538-2554. doi: 10.3390/s90402538
  18. Келлер О.К., Кратыш Г.С., Лубяницкий Г.Д. Ультразвуковая очистка. Л.Машиностроение. 1977;184 с.
  19. Цуканов А.Ю., Ахметов Д.С., Блесман А.И., Рогачев Е.А. Влияние поверхности мочеточникового стента на инкрустацию и формирование биопленок. Урология. 2018;2:40-45. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2018.2.40-45.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies