On extended biopsy of the prostatic gland
- Authors: Chepurov AK1, Vladimirov VG1, Zerinskaya SA1, Meshkov VV1, Ko baladze KM1, Iremashvili VV1, Chepurov AK1, Vladimirov VG1, Zerinskaya SA1, Meshkov VV1, Kobaladze KM1, Iremashvili VV1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 1 (2010)
- Pages: 52-55
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1728-2985/article/view/277564
- ID: 277564
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
About the authors
A K Chepurov
V G Vladimirov
S A Zerinskaya
V V Meshkov
K M Ko baladze
V V Iremashvili
A K Chepurov
V G Vladimirov
S A Zerinskaya
V V Meshkov
K M Kobaladze
V V Iremashvili
References
- Grayhack J. T., Bockrath J. M. Diagnosis of carcinoma of prostate. Urology 1981; 17 (suppl. 3): 54-60.
- Hodge K. K., McNeal J. E., Terris M. K., Stamey T. A. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 1989; 142: 71-74.
- Eichler K., Hempel S., Wilby J. et al. Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2006; 175: 1605-1612.
- Scattoni V., Zlotta A., Montironi R. et al. Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterization of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur. Urol. 2007; 52: 1309-1322.
- LaSpina M., Haas G. P. Update on the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. Can. J. Urol. 2008; 15 (suppl. 1): 3-13.
- Ficarra V., Novella G., Novara G. et al. The potential impact of prostate volume in the planning of optimal number of cores in the systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. Eur. Urol. 2005; 48: 932-937.