Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in disseminated non-seminoma germinogenic testicular tumors after chemotherapy in patients with elevated serum tumor markers


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RLND) was performed in 70 testicular non-seminoma patients with elevated serum tumor markers (age median 27.0±8.1 years) from 1983 to 2008. N1, N2, N3, Nx were diagnosed in 4 (5.7%), 10 (14.3%), 35 (50.0%), 21 (30.0%) patients. Distant metastases were present in 23 (32.9%) cases. The level of the initial tumor markers was elevated in all the patients: S1- 169(46.0%), S2 - 108(29.4%), S3 - 51(13.9%), Sx - 39(10.6%). According to the IGCCCG prognostic model, 11 (15.7%) patients were classified as good, 19 (27.1%) - as moderate, 16 (22.9%) - as poor prognostic groups. The prognostic group was not identified in 24 (34.3%) cases which started treatment in other hospitals. All the patients received induction cisplatin-based chemotherapy following orchidectomy (first-line - 24(34.3%), second-line - 46(65.7%) which resulted in tumor shrinkage < 50% in 7 (10.0%), 51-90% in 23 (32.9%), > 90% - in 2 (2.9%) cases. The response was not properly assessed in 38 (54.3%) cases. CT scan revealed residual retroperitoneal masses after chemotherapy in all the patients: < 2 cm - 5 (7.1%), 2-5 cm - 25 (35.7%), > 5 cm - 40 (57.1%). The level of the tumor markers remained positive in all the patients. Further chemotherapy was not perspective in all 70 patients who further underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RLND). Radical RLND was performed in 59 (84.3%) patients. Postoperative chemotherapy was given to 27 (38.6%) cases. Median follow-up was 20.8 (3-137) months. Complications developed in 12.9% (9/70) patients. Mortality was 1.4% (1/70). Histology revealed necrosis in 20 (28.6%), teratoma - in 26 (37.1%), cancer - in 24 (34.3%) specimens. Prognostic factors for cancer in retroperitoneal pathology were the following: S > S1 (p = 0.013), intermediate or poor prognosis group IGCCCG (p = 0.014), absence of embryonal carcinoma (p = 0.003), the presence of choriocarcinoma in the testicular tumor (p = 0.028), second-line chemotherapy (p = 0.001), residualmass > 2 cm (p = 0.006). Five-year overall, specific and progression-free survival of 70 patients was 41.0%, 42.4% and 31.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed an adverse impact on progressive-free survival of category S > S1 (p = 0.015), intermediate or poor prognostic group IGCCCG (p = 0.01), the presence of embryonal carcinoma (p = 0.020) and the absence of choriocarcinoma in the testicular tumor (p = 0.029), tumor shrinkage < 50% (p < 0.0001), incomplete RLND (p = 0.012), an incomplete effect of the combined treatment (p < 0.0001), cancer in the residual mass (p < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis proved predictive value of an incomplete effect of the combined treatment (p < 0.0001). Thus, selected testicular non-seminoma patients with elevated serum tumor markers are curable with surgery. The best candidates for RLND in this group are patients without a tumor markers level increase during chemotherapy, with S1 category, good IGCCCG prognosis, tumor shrinkage > 50% and potentially respectable residual disease.

References

  1. Donohue J. P., Rowland R. G., Kopecky K. et al. Correlation of computerized tomographic changes and histological findings in 80 patients having radical retroperitoneal lymph node dissection after chemotherapy for testis cancer. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 1987; 137(6):1176--1179.
  2. Mulders P. F., Oosterhof G. O., Boetes C. et al. The importance of prognostic factors in the individual treatment ofpatients with disseminated germ cell tumours. Br. J. Urol. 1990; 66(4): 425- 429.
  3. Einhorn L. H., Weathers T., Loehrer P. et al. Second line chemotherapy with vinblastine, ifosfamide, and cisplatin after initial chemotherapy with cisplatin, VP-16, and bleomycin (PVP16B) in disseminated germ cell tumors (GCT): Long term followup. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol.1992; 11: 196, abstr. 599.
  4. Nichols C. R., Anderson J., Lazarus H. M. et al. High-dose carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation in refractory germ cell cancer: An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group protocol. J. Clin. Oncol. 1992; 10: 558-563.
  5. Albers P., Ganz A., Hannig E. et al. Salvage surgery of chemorefractory germ cell rumors with elevated tumor markers. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2000; 164: 381-384.
  6. Ravi R., Ong J., Oliver R. T., et al. Surgery as salvage therapy in chemotherapy-resistant nonseminomatous germ cell tumours. Br. J. Urol. 1998; 81: 884-888.
  7. Beck S. D., Foster R. S., Bihrle R. et al. Outcome analysis for patients with elevated serum tumor markers at postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. J. Clin.Oncol. 2005; 23(25): 6149-6156.
  8. Coogan C. L., Foster R. S., Rowland R. G. et al. Postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is effective therapy in selected patients with elevated tumor markers after primary chemotherapy alone. Urology 1997; 50: 957-962.
  9. Wood D. P. Jr., Herr H. W., Motzer R. J. et al. Surgical resection of solitary metastases after chemotherapy in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors and elevated serum tumor markers. Cancer 1992; 70: 2354-2357.
  10. Van der Gaast A., Hoekstra J. W., Croles J. J. et al. Elevated serum tumor markers in patients with testicular cancer after induction chemotherapy due to a reservoir of markers in cystic differentiated mature teratoma. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 1991; 145: 829-831.
  11. Eastham J. A., Wilson T. G., Russell C. et al. Surgical resection in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumorwho fail to normalize serum tumor markers after chemotherapy. Urology 1994; 43: 74-80.
  12. Murphy B. R., Breeden E. S., Donohue J. P. et al. Surgical salvage of chemorefractory germ cell tumors. J. Clin. Oncol. 1993; 11: 324-329.
  13. Fox E. P., Weathers T. D., Williams S. D. et al. Outcome analysis for patients with persistent nonteratomatous germ cell tumor in postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissections. J. Clin.Oncol. 1993; 11: 1294-1299.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2010 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies