Antegrade endopyelotomy in the treatment of patients with pelvicoureteral segment stricture in combination with urolithiasis


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

A total of 17 urolithiasis patients (12 males, 5 females aged 29-65 years, mean 47 ± 8.2 years) with pelvicoureteral segment stricture (PUS) received percutaneous surgical treatment in the clinic of urology and surgical andrology from 2005 to 2009. The treatment consisted in endopyelotomy combined with nephrolithotomy and/or contact lithotripsy. Bilateral concrements were detected in 4 (23.5%) patients. Of them, 1 (5.9%) had PUS strictures in both kidneys. Good short-term results were achieved in 14 (82.4%) patients, satisfactory results - in 2 (11.8%) patients, unsatisfactory - in 1 (5.9%) patient. After long-term follow-up examination (mean follow-up 14 months after the operation) of all 17 patients it was found that 14 (82.4%) patients improved PUS condition (by the data of excretory urography and multislice computed tomography). Urological complaints were absent in 16 (94.1%) patients.

References

  1. Van Cangh P. J., Nesa S., Tombal B. The role of endourology in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2001; 2: 149-153.
  2. Kim S. C., Kuo R. L., Lingeman J. E. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2003; 13: 235-241.
  3. Bernardo N. O., Smith A. D. Percutaneous endopyelotomy. Urology 2000; 56: 322-327.
  4. Марков А. Г., Ергаков Д. В., Лисенок А. А., Серебряный С. А. Эндопиелотомия в лечении стриктур лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента. В кн.: Пленум Российского о-ва урологов: Материалы. Екатеринбург; 2006. 220-221.
  5. Gerber C. S., Kim J. C. Ureteroscopy endopyelotomy in the treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2000; 55: 198-203.
  6. Резниченко А. А. Стеноз лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента при нефролитиазе (диагностика и терапия): Дис. ... канд. мед. наук. ; 1992.
  7. Soylu A., Murat Y. et al. Bilateral kidney stones with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Nature Clin. Pract. Urol. 2005; 2: 351-354.
  8. Knudsen B. E., Cook A. J., Watterson J. D. et al. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy long-term results from one institution. Urology 2004; 63: 230-234.
  9. Теодорович О. В., Абдуллаев М. И. Рентгеноэндоскопическая диагностика и лечение стриктур лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента и мочеточника. Урология 2003; 6: 52- 58.
  10. Sundaram C. P., Grubb R. L. 3-rd, Rehman J. et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2003; 169: 2037-2040.
  11. Lam J. S., Cooper K. L., Greene T. D. et al. Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy. Urology 2003; 61: 1107-1112.
  12. Kapoor R., Zaman W., Kumar A. et al. Endopyelotomy in poorly functioning kidney: is it worthwhile? J. Endourol. 2001; 15: 725-728.
  13. Pardalidis N. P., Papatsoris A. G., Kosmaoglou E. V. Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2003; 168: 1937-1940.
  14. Bernardo N. O. et al. Stone recurrence after endopyelotomy. Urology 2000; 56: 378-381.
  15. Mandhani A., Kapoor R., Zaman W. et al. Is a two-week duration sufficient for stenting in endopyelotomy? J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2003; 169: 886-889.
  16. Matin S. F., Streem S. B. Metabolic risk factors in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and renal calculi. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2000; 163: 1676-1678.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies