Antegrade endopyelotomy in the treatment of patients with pelvicoureteral segment stricture in combination with urolithiasis


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

A total of 17 urolithiasis patients (12 males, 5 females aged 29-65 years, mean 47 ± 8.2 years) with pelvicoureteral segment stricture (PUS) received percutaneous surgical treatment in the clinic of urology and surgical andrology from 2005 to 2009. The treatment consisted in endopyelotomy combined with nephrolithotomy and/or contact lithotripsy. Bilateral concrements were detected in 4 (23.5%) patients. Of them, 1 (5.9%) had PUS strictures in both kidneys. Good short-term results were achieved in 14 (82.4%) patients, satisfactory results - in 2 (11.8%) patients, unsatisfactory - in 1 (5.9%) patient. After long-term follow-up examination (mean follow-up 14 months after the operation) of all 17 patients it was found that 14 (82.4%) patients improved PUS condition (by the data of excretory urography and multislice computed tomography). Urological complaints were absent in 16 (94.1%) patients.

References

  1. Van Cangh P. J., Nesa S., Tombal B. The role of endourology in ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2001; 2: 149-153.
  2. Kim S. C., Kuo R. L., Lingeman J. E. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an update. Curr. Opin. Urol. 2003; 13: 235-241.
  3. Bernardo N. O., Smith A. D. Percutaneous endopyelotomy. Urology 2000; 56: 322-327.
  4. Марков А. Г., Ергаков Д. В., Лисенок А. А., Серебряный С. А. Эндопиелотомия в лечении стриктур лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента. В кн.: Пленум Российского о-ва урологов: Материалы. Екатеринбург; 2006. 220-221.
  5. Gerber C. S., Kim J. C. Ureteroscopy endopyelotomy in the treatment of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology 2000; 55: 198-203.
  6. Резниченко А. А. Стеноз лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента при нефролитиазе (диагностика и терапия): Дис. ... канд. мед. наук. ; 1992.
  7. Soylu A., Murat Y. et al. Bilateral kidney stones with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Nature Clin. Pract. Urol. 2005; 2: 351-354.
  8. Knudsen B. E., Cook A. J., Watterson J. D. et al. Percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy long-term results from one institution. Urology 2004; 63: 230-234.
  9. Теодорович О. В., Абдуллаев М. И. Рентгеноэндоскопическая диагностика и лечение стриктур лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента и мочеточника. Урология 2003; 6: 52- 58.
  10. Sundaram C. P., Grubb R. L. 3-rd, Rehman J. et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2003; 169: 2037-2040.
  11. Lam J. S., Cooper K. L., Greene T. D. et al. Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy. Urology 2003; 61: 1107-1112.
  12. Kapoor R., Zaman W., Kumar A. et al. Endopyelotomy in poorly functioning kidney: is it worthwhile? J. Endourol. 2001; 15: 725-728.
  13. Pardalidis N. P., Papatsoris A. G., Kosmaoglou E. V. Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2003; 168: 1937-1940.
  14. Bernardo N. O. et al. Stone recurrence after endopyelotomy. Urology 2000; 56: 378-381.
  15. Mandhani A., Kapoor R., Zaman W. et al. Is a two-week duration sufficient for stenting in endopyelotomy? J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2003; 169: 886-889.
  16. Matin S. F., Streem S. B. Metabolic risk factors in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction and renal calculi. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2000; 163: 1676-1678.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2011 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies