RESULTS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY IN NEPHROLITHIAS IS ENDEMIC REGION


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This paper presents results of implementation (1993) of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in Perm region, in which nephrolithiasis is endemic. Results achieved with ESWL using two Dornier lithotripters in 6054 patients were analyzed in detail. 93% of the patients had complete and 6,2% partial stone destruction and clearance, therefore positive results were achieved in 99,2% patients. In only 0,8% of the patients ESWL did not result in stone destruction. ESWL complications were registered in 0,64% of patients and included: subcapsular kidney hematoma (0,03%), intense hematuria (0,15%), acute pyelonephritis (0,46%). Over the past 22 years since implementation of ESWL in Perm region with the use of 4 Dornier lithotripters the number of open surgeries for nephrolithiasis fell by 11 times (4% of all nephrolithiasis patients), nephrolithiasis mortality and length of treatment decreased by 5,4 and 4,1 times, respectively.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

M. I Davidov

SBEI HPE «Perm State Medical Academy n.a. ac. E.I. Vagner» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Email: midavidov@mail.ru
h.D. , Prof., Head of Course of Urology, urologist of highest category

A. M Igoshev

SBEI HPE «Perm State Medical Academy n.a. ac. E.I. Vagner» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

D. I Dremin

SBEI HPE «Perm State Medical Academy n.a. ac. E.I. Vagner» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

References

  1. Аляев Ю.Г., Газимиев М.А., Руденко В.И. и др. Мочекаменная болезнь: современные методы диагностики и лечения: Руководство / Под ред. Ю.Г. Аляева. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2010. 224 с.
  2. Daudon M, Knebelmann B. Epidemiology of urolithiasis. Rev. Prat. 2011;61 (3): 372-378.
  3. Brener Z.Z., Winchester J.E., Salman H., Bergman M. Nephrolithiasis: evaluation and management. South. Med. J. 2011;104(2):133-139.
  4. Аполихин О.И., Сивков А.В., Солнцева Т.В. и др. Эпидемиология МКБ в различных регионах РФ по данным официальной статистики. Саратов. науч.-мед. журн. 2011;7:120.
  5. Лопаткин Н.А., Дзеранов Н.К. Анализ развития осложнений дистанционной ударноволновой литотрипсии. В кн.: Пленум Всерос. общества урологов: Тез. докл. Пермь. 1994. С. 186-194.
  6. Chaussy C., Brendel W., Schmiedt E. Extracoiporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet. 1980;2:1265- 1268.
  7. Аляев Ю.Г., Руденко В.И., Газимиев М.А. и др. Современные аспекты диагностики и лечения мочекаменной болезни. Урология. 2006; 2: 6-12.
  8. Лопаткин Н.А., Трапезникова М.Ф., Дутов В.В., Дзеранов Н.К. Дистанционная ударно-волновая литотрипсия: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Урология. 2007;6:3-13.
  9. Максимов В.А., Логвинов Л.А., Гарилевич Б.А. и др. Первый опыт применения дистанционной литотрипсии в условиях поликлиники. Урология. 2010;2:11-13.
  10. Никулина Е.С., Трапезникова М.Ф., Дутов В.В. и др. Выбор метода лечения больных камнями лоханочно-мочеточникового сегмента. Урология. 2013;6:20-23.
  11. McAteer J.A., Evan A.R. The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy. Semin. Nephrol. 2008;28:200-213.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies