Features of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in patients with urolithiasis of solitary kidney


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article describes the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in 49 urolithiasis patients with a solitary kidney. In 44 (89.8%) patients the calculi were located in the kidney, in 5 (10.2%) patients - in the upper third of the ureter. The calculi were single (18; 36.7%), multiple (14; 28.6%) or stag-horn (17; 34.7%). Efficiency of PCNL estimated immediately after surgery and at the end of the third month of observation was 75.5 and 93.9%, respectively. Stone size (p=0.594), the baseline state of urodynamics of the upper urinary tract (p=0.205) did not affect the renal clearance at PCNL. Enlargement of initial calculus size positively correlated with the number of required treatment sessions (p=0.013), duration of surgery (p<0.0001), and the length of postoperative hospital stay (p<0.0001). Complications were common (44.9%), but the auxiliary manipulations were performed infrequently (26.5%). No associations were found between the size of calculus, the number of complications and secondary manipulations (p=0.361). No correlations were found between the clinical form of a solitary kidney with urolithiasis and the occurrence of complications during the treatment course (p=0.121), as well as between the presence of complications and the cause of the «loss» of the contralateral kidney (p> 0.05). Thus, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy is a highly effective method modality of treatment of solitary kidney urolithiasis. Appropriate selection of indications and contraindications for PCNL, preoperative preparation, surgical technique, postoperative patient management are of great importance.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

V. V Dutov

SBIH MR «Moscow regional research clinical institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirskiy»

S. B Urenkov

SBIH MR «Moscow regional research clinical institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirskiy»

I. G Parshenkova

SBIH MR «Moscow regional research clinical institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirskiy»

Email: irina.parshenkova@bk.ru
Doctoral Student of Department of Urology

A. A Rumjancev

SBIH MR «Moscow regional research clinical institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirskiy»

E. A Mamedov

SBIH MR «Moscow regional research clinical institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirskiy»

References

  1. Curhan G.C. Epidemiology of stone disease. Urol. clin. north Am. 2007;34(3):287-293.
  2. Аляев Ю.Г., Амосов А.В., Саенко В.С. Метафилактика мочекаменной болезни. М.: Эксмо, 2007. 350 с.
  3. Дутов В.В. Современные аспекты лечения некоторых форм мочекаменной болезни. Дисс. д-ра мед. наук. М., 2000. 404 с.
  4. Москаленко С.А. Дистанционная литотрипсия в лечении различных форм нефролитиаза единственной почки. Дисс. канд. мед. наук. М., 1998.
  5. Amr F., El-Sheikh M., El-Sergany R., Abdel-Rassoul M.A., Elshenofy A., Ghamrawy H., El Bary A.A., Fayad T. Effect of multiple access tracts during PCNL on renal function: baseline creatinine and glomerular filtration rate are important predictors. J. Urol. 2013;189(4):693.
  6. Eisenberger F., Schmidt A. ESWL and the future ofstone management. World J. Urol. 1993;11(1):194.
  7. Bucuras V., Gopalakrishnam G., Wolf J.S., Sun Y., Bianchi G., Erdogru T., de la Rosette J. CROES PCNL Study Group. Society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: nephrolithotomy in 189 patients with solitary kidneys. J. Endourol. 2011;25(1):11-17.
  8. El-Tabey N.A., El-Nahas A.R., Eraky I., Shoma A.M., El-Assmy A.M., Soliman S.A., Shokeir A.A., Mohsen T., El-Kappany H.A., El-Kenawy M.R. Long-term functional outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in solitary kidney. Urology. 2014;83(5):1011- 1015.
  9. Wong K.A., Sahai A., Patel A., Thomas K., Bultitude M., Glass J. Is percutaneous nephrolithotomy ibn solitary kidneys safe? Urology. 2013;82(5):1013-1016.
  10. Wickham J.E.A., Miller R.A., Kellett M.J., Payne S.R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: one stage or two? Br. J. Urol. 1984;56(6):582- 585.
  11. Huang W.-H., Jiann B.-P., et al. Risk factors of massive bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy and its management. JTUA. 2003;14(2):65-70.
  12. Sofer M., Lidawi G,. Keren-Paz G., Yehiely R., Beri A., Matzkin H. Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: first 200 cases in Israel. Isr. Med. Assoc. J. 2010;12:164-167.
  13. Lojanapiwat B., Soonthornphan S., Wudhikarn S. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J. Endourol. 2001;15:711-713.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies