Cytological evaluation of urothelial damage in extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction The study proposed a technique for early detection of the damaging effect of shock waves on the urinary tract tissues, for monitoring the state of urothelial cells in the early post-procedure period and choosing an adequate method for preventing and managing possible compIications. Materials and methods The study analyzed the urine samples of 300 patients aged 20 to 50 years, who for the first time underwent ESWL for kidney stones. The urine sediment smears were fixed in the May-Grunwald stain and stained with azure eosin solution according to Pappenheim. Besides evaIuating generaI cytoIogic characteristics, a morphometric examination of urine sediment was performed. Results and discussion To define quantitative parameters, the total number of epithelial cells (£ep) was determined with further calculation of the mean number of epithelial cells in the field of view (Xep= £ep/10). Correlation between the number of abnormal epithelial cells (Xcp) and the total number of epithelial cells (£ep) was analyzed. The resulted «destruction index» (DI) was the «pool» of all cytopathological changes in epithelial cells DI = Xcp/£ep. Immediately after ESWL, DI markedly increased with significant difference (р<0.05) in numeric values. Two hours after the procedure, the DI reduced compared to the previous value. And only at day 4 DI was close to the norm, although remaining somewhat elevated. Conclusion Extracorporeal shock waves lithotripsy produces the acute urotheIiaI damage resuIting in cytopathoIogicaI changes of varying severity. The above-mentioned technique provides objective and highly significant clinical and diagnostic information on the state of the urothelium after the exposure to shock waves.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. M Grabsky

Yerevan M. Heratsi State MedicaI University; UroIogy CIinic, IzmirIyan MedicaI Center

Email: grabsky@hotmaiI.com
Department of Urology and Andrology; PhD, Associate Professor, Head of UroIogy CIinic

E. V Manukyan

UroIogy CIinic, IzmirIyan MedicaI Center

Email: emanukjan@yahoo.com

A. A Muradyan

Yerevan M. Heratsi State MedicaI University

Email: muradyan_a@yahoo.com
Department of Urology and Andrology

References

  1. Айдинян С.А. О мочекаменной болезни и ее распространенности в Армении. «Медицина на службе соц. строительства». 1933;3:153-165
  2. Егиазарян А.Г. О составе и структуре камней мочевой системы у жителей Армянской ССР. Диссертация на соискание ученой степени к.м.н. Ереван, 1972
  3. Абрамян А.Я. Рецидивы и послеоперационное лечение больных нефролитиазом. Урология. 1957;4:8-12
  4. Агаджанян И.Г. Материалы к изучению этиологии и патогенеза нефролитиаза. Диссертация на соискание ученой степени к.м.н. Ленинград, 1967
  5. Лопаткин Н.А., Шокуров М.М., Голубчиков В.А. Экстракорпоральное дробление камней почек ударными волнами. Урология и нефрология. 1986;1:3-9
  6. Дзеранов Н.К., Гришкова Н.В. Бойко Т.А., Голованов С.А. Условия для проведения дистанционной литотрипсии при различном физико-химическом составе мочевых камней. Урология и нефрология. 1994;6:10-13
  7. Аль-Шукри С.Х., Ткачук В.Н., Дубинский В.Я. Дистанционная ударно-волновая литотрипсия при различных клинических формах нефролитиаза. Санкт-Петербург, 1997
  8. Трапезникова М.Ф., Дутов В.В., Современные аспекты дистанционной литотрипсии. Урология и нефрология. 1999;1:8-12
  9. Тиктиниский О.Л., Александров В.П. Мочекаменная болезнь. СПб.: Изд-во ПИТЕР, 2000
  10. Tiselius H.G., Ackermann D., Alken P., Buck C., Conort P., Gallucci M. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2001;40(4):362-371.
  11. McAteer J.A., Evan Andrew P. The Acute and Long-Term Adverse Effects of Shock Wave Lithotripsy Semin Nephrol. 2008;28(2): 200-213.
  12. Аляев Ю.Г., Рапопорт Л.М., Руденко В.И., Винаров А.З. Осложнения дистанционной ударно-волновой литотрипсии [ДУВЛ]. Профилактика и лечение. Издательство ЦПК. М., 2001
  13. Бешлиев Д.А. Опасности, ошибки, осложнения дистанционной литотрипсии, их лечение и профилактика. М., 2003
  14. Lokhandwalla M., Sturtevant B. Fracture mechanics model of stone comminution in ESWL and implications for tissue damage. Phys Med Biol. 2000;45:1923-1940.
  15. Билич Г.Л., Крыжановский В.А. Биология. Полный курс: В. 4 т. Издание 5-е, дополненное и переработанное. М.: Изд-во Оникс, 2009. Т. 1. 864 с
  16. McAteer J.A., Evan A.P. The Acute and Long-Term Adverse Effects of Shock Wave Lithotripsy. Seminars in nephrology. 2008;28(2):200- 213.
  17. Evan A.P., McAteer J.A., Connors B.A., Blomgren P.M., Lingeman J.E. Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery. BJU Int. 2007;100(3):624- 647.
  18. Lingeman J.E., Woods J., Toth P.D., Evan A.P., McAteer J.A. The role of lithotripsy and its side effects. J. Urol. 1989;141(3 Pt 2):793-797.
  19. Миронова И.И., Романова Л.А. Атлас осадков мочи. Тверь: Триада, 2015. 171 с.
  20. Автандилов Г.Г. Медицинская морфометрия. Руководство. М.: Медицина, 1990. 384 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies