Left-sided renal cell cacrinoma with vena cava inferior thrombus: totally laparoscopic removal


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

A surgical treatment of patients with tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava (IVC) of levels II-III, originating from the left renal vein involves performing thrombectomy, radical nephrectomy and lymph nodes dissection. In most cases it requires major open surgery which leads to complications in 38% of patients and perioperative mortality of 4-10%. In recent years, the laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy have been gradually introduced. However, there are anecdotal reports about performing of such interventions in case of left-sided renal tumor with thrombus in the IVC. A description of technique and own experience of performing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy from the IVC in 3 patients with tumor thrombus of levels II-III, originating from left kidney are presented. In one case distant metastases were detected preoperatively and in another patient an involvement of tail of the pancreas by the tumor was diagnosed. There was no conversion to open surgery. The maximum tumor size ranged from 5 to 16 cm. The length of tumor thrombus in the IVC was 2.4-7 cm and estimated blood loss was 300-2500 ml. In one case a blood transfusion was required postoperatively. The follow-up period was 4-26 months. One patient died from progression of the disease after 5 months, two other patients are alive without any signs of relapse. The initial experience of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy from IVC in patients with left-sided renal cell cancer suggests that this technique is reproducible and relatively safe with respecting of basic principles of oncology and vascular surgery. The surgery is not associated with major perioperative complications, significant blood loss and is accompanied by a rather favorable postoperative period. An accumulation of a larger number of cases is needed to assess the oncological results of this technique.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

D. V Perlin

FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ “Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology”

Email: dvperlin@mail.ru
Dr.Med.Sci., Head ofDepartment ofUrology, Nephrology and Transplantation

A. A Vorobiev

FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

Dr.Med.Sci., professor, Head of Department of Regional Anatomy and Operative Surgery

V. P Zippunnikov

FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ “Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology”

assistant at the Department ofUrology, Nephrology and Transplantation

I. N Dymkov

FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ “Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology”

assistant at the Department of Urology, Nephrology and Transplantation

References

  1. Алексеев Б.Я., Калпинский А.С., Мухомедьярова А.А., Нюшко К.М., Каприн А.Д. Таргетная терапия больных метастатическим раком почки неблагоприятного прогноза. Онкоурология. 2017; 13(2) :49-55). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2017-13-2-49-55.
  2. Волкова М.И., Черняев В.А., Климов А.В., Бегалиев А.Д., Мхитарян С.М., Огородникова Е.В., Матвеев В.Б. Нефрэктомия, тромбэктомия у больных раком почки с метастазами в легкие. Онкоурология. 2018;14(1):28-35). doi: 10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-1-28-35.
  3. Gill I., Metcalfe C., Abreu A., Duddalwar V., Chopra S., Cunningham M., Thangathurai D., Ukimura O., Satkunasivam R., Hung A., Papalia R., Aron M., Desai M., Gallucci M. Robotic Level III Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy: Initial Series. J. Urol. 2015;194(4):929-938. Doi:10.1016/j. juro.2015.03.119.
  4. Blute M., Leibovich B., Lohse C., Cheville J., Zincke H. The Mayo Clinic experience with surgical management, complications and outcome for patients with renal cell carcinoma and venous tumour thrombus. BJU International. 2004;94(1):33-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2004.04897.x.
  5. Chopra S., Simone G., Metcalfe C., de Castro Abreu A., Nabhani J., Ferriero M., Bove A., Sotelo R., Aron M., Desai M., Gallucci M., Gill I. Robot-assisted Level II-III Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombectomy: Step-by-Step Technique and 1-Year Outcomes. Eur Urol. 2017;72(2):267-274. Doi: 0.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.066.
  6. Desai, M., Gill, I., Ramani, A., Matin, S., Kaouk, J., Campero J. Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy For Cancer With Level I. Renal Vein Involvement. J. Urol. 2003;487-491. doi: 10.1097/00005392-200302000-00012.
  7. Abaza R. Initial Series of Robotic Radical Nephrectomy with Vena Caval Tumor Thrombectomy. Eur. Urol. 2011 ;59(4) :652-656. Doi: 10.1016/j. eururo.2010.08.038.
  8. Bratslavsky G., Cheng J. WITHDRAWN: Robotic-assisted Radical Nephrectomy With Retrohepatic Vena Caval Tumor Thrombectomy (Level III) Combined With Extended Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection. Urology. 2015. pii: S0090-4295(15)00799-2. Doi:10.1016/j. urology.2015.08.009.
  9. Shao P., Li J., Qin C. et al. Laparoscopic Radical Nephrectomy and Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy in the Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2015;68(1):115-122. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.011.
  10. Wang B., Li H., Ma X. et al. Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Inferior Vena Cava Thrombectomy: Different Sides Require Different Techniques. Eur Urol. 2016;69(6):1112-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.001.
  11. Ramirez D., Maurice M., Cohen B., Krishnamurthi V., Haber G. Robotic Level III IVC Tumor Thrombectomy: Duplicating the Open Approach. Urology. 2016;90:204-207. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.01.011.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies