Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: novel technique with late dividing of the ureters


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) still remains a complex and timedemanding procedure. The number of patients with baseline chronic kidney diseases has gradually increased. Aim: to compare the results of our novel technique of LRC with late dividing of the ureters with conventional procedure. Materials and methods. A total of 50 patients with bladder cancer, who underwent to LRC in a single clinic between April 2013 and January 2017, were included in the study. A conventional LRC was performed in 25 patients, while in other 25 cases, a novel technique of LRC was used. In all cases, LRC was done with fully intracorporeal urinary diversion. Statistical analysis was performed using the Shapiro-Wilk test for parametric testing. In order to compare two groups, Student t-test was used for independent samples. Results. There were no significant differences between two groups in average length of procedure, blood loss volume and length of hospital stay. Major intraoperative complications (injury of the rectum) occurred in two patients, one in each group. Both cases were successfully managed intraoperatively. In addition, there were two postoperative complications in each group that required repeat intervention. The mean serum creatinine level on the 2nd day after surgery was significantly higher after conventional LRC (171.6 and 147.7 μmol/L), while glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower (58 and 72 ml/ min/1.73 m2 ), compared to group of novel technique of LRC with late dividing of the ureters. A total of four patients in group of conventional LRC and two patients in group of novel technique had cancer progression. Two patients (one in each group) died because of cancer progression after 15 and 34 months after surgery. The mean follow-up was 25.6 (12-39) months after LRC with late dividing of the ureters and 33.2 (18-48) months in group of standard LRC. Conclusion. LRC with late dividing of the ureters allow to prevent prolonged contact of hyperosmolar and, in some cases, non-sterile urine with peritoneum and decrease inflammation and risk of postoperative adhesions. Using of novel technique may decrease rate of perioperative nephropathy, which is especially important in patients with decreased renal function (single functioning kidney, hydronephrosis, diabetes, renal failure, adjuvant chemotherapy). However, more procedures and longer follow-up period are necessary in order to evaluate ontological results of the novel technique

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

D. V. Perlin

FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ “Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology”

Email: dvperlin@mail.ru
MD, Head of Department of Urology, Nephrology and Transplantation, Chief Volgograd, Russia

I. V Alexandrov

FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ “Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology”

Ph.D., Department of Urology, Nephrology and Transplantation, urologist Volgograd, Russia

V. P Zippunnikov

FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia; GBUZ “Volgograd Regional Center of Urology and Nephrology”

assistant at the Department of Urology, Nephrology and Transplantation, urologist Volgograd, Russia

A. O Shmanev

FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia

oncologist Volgograd, Russia

References

  1. Kaprin A.D. et al. Diagnosis And Staging Of Bladder Cancer. Diagnostic Radiology And Radiotherapy, no. 4, 2018. Р. 16-24. Baltic Medical Education Center. doi: 10.22328/2079-5343-2017-4-16-24.
  2. Matveev V.B. et al. Outcome Of Salvage Cystectomy In Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. European Urology Supplements. 2016;15(13):e1710. doi: 10.1016/s1569-9056(16)30482-1.
  3. Simonato A., Ennas M. Re: Ben J. Challacombe, Bernard H. Bochner, Prokar Dasgupta, et al. The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications. Eur Urol 2011;60:767-75. Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):e29; author reply e30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.015.
  4. Hemal A.K. Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy in the management of bladder cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 2009;10(1):45-54. doi: 10.1007/s11934-009-0009-8.
  5. Chade D.C., Laudone V.P., Bochner B.H., Parra R.O. Oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: open versus minimally invasive approaches. J Urol. 2010; 183(3):862-869. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.019.
  6. Puppo P., Introini C., Naselli A. Surgery insight: advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic radical cystectomy to treat invasive bladder cancer. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2007;4(7):387-394. Doi: 10.1038/ ncpuro0840.
  7. Kim T.H., Sung H.H., Jeon H.G., et al. Oncological Outcomes in Patients Treated with Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: Comparison Between Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Approaches. J Endourol. 2016;30(7):783-791. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0652.
  8. Navai N., Dinney C.P. Oncologic Equivalence between Laparoscopic/ Robotic and Open Radical Cystectomy. J Urol. 2016;195(6):1646-1647. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.067.
  9. Snow-Lisy D.C., Campbell S.C., Gill I.S., et al. Robotic and laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: long-term oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2014;65(1):193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.08.021.
  10. Gershman B., Eisenberg M.S., Thompson R.H. et al. Comparative impact of continent and incontinent urinary diversion on long-term renal function after radical cystectomy in patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease 2 and chronic kidney disease 3a. Int J Urol. 2015;22(7):651-656. doi: 10.1111/iju.12770.
  11. Perlin D.V., Alexandrov I.V., Zipunnikov V.P., Shmanev A.O. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: key points. Cancer Urology. 2018; 14(1): 136-143. https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-1-136-143
  12. Hatakeyama S., Koie T., Narita T, et al. Renal Function Outcomes and Risk Factors for Stage 3B Chronic Kidney Disease after Urinary Diversion in Patients with Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer. PLoS ONE. 2016,11(2):e0149544. Doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0149544.
  13. Rios Gonzalez, Emilio et al. Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy. Clinical And Translational Oncology. 2009;11(12):799-804. doi: 10.1007/s12094-009-0448-1.
  14. Irwin B.H., Gill I.S., Haber G.P. et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy: current status, outcomes, and patient selection. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2009;10(3-4):243-255. doi: 10.1007/s11864-009-0095-3.
  15. Shao P., Li P., Ju X., et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder: technique and clinical outcomes. Urology. 2015;85(2):368-373. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.09.059.
  16. Castro-Cuenca A., Angel-Muller E., Gonzalez-Carrillo V.A. Chemical peritonitis after a bladder lesion during a cesarean section. A case report and literature review. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2015;83(2):120-124.
  17. Glybochko P.V., Glybochko Yu.G., Alyaev Alyaev E.V., et al. Laparoscopic Cystoprostatvesiculeectomy With Orthotopic Excentric Ileal Bladder Substitution. Urologiia. 2017:78-83. doi: 10.18565/urol.2017.3.78-83.
  18. Elsevier B.V. Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy. Arab Journal Of Urology. 2012;10(1):40-45. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2012.01.003.
  19. Haber G.P., Crouzet S., Gill I.S. et al. Laparoscopic And Robotic Assisted Radical Cystectomy For Bladder Cancer: A Critical Analysis. Eur Urol. 2008;54(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.076.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2019 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies