A comparison of knot-free and interrupted suturing of vesicourethral anastomosis during learning curve of radical prostatectomy


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) is the most popular treatment method for localized prostate cancer worldwide. This is a technically-demanding procedure with a long learning curve. Therefore, an improvement of the surgical technique is very important in order to simplify training for LRP. Dorsal vein ligation and vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) are two major problems for surgeons with insufficient experience in LRP. Previous studies have shown that between 50 and 250 procedures are required in order to get necessary skills. Aim: to compare and study the advantages of the “free-tie” technique and interrupted suture during the formation of VUA during learning curve of LRP. Materials and methods: a single-center retrospective analysis was performed by evaluating operational reports, video recordings and histories of patients who were operated at Saint Petersburg Public Hospital of Saint Luca from 2016 to 2018. A total of 104 patients were included in the study, 56 of them were undergone to “free-tie” technique and 48 patients had interrupted suture. All procedures were performed by four surgeons with an experience ofless than 100 LRP. The evaluation criteria included the time of formation of VUA, the duration of whole procedure, the duration of bladder catheterization, frequency of anastomotic leak and stress urinary incontinence. Results: For surgeons who learned the technique of LRP, the use of a continuous suture with a self-anchoring V-loc thread allowed to reduce significantly the time of formation of VUA and ligation of dorsal venous plexus. Such a suture is more convenient for the surgeon than interrupted suture and makes LRP more proficient and efficient, allowing to reduce the time of procedure, the duration of catheterization, postoperative complications rate associated with anastomotic leak, and also to lower frequency of stress urinary incontinence and obstruction of VUA. This technique may reduce the period necessary for mastering LRP. Conclusion: “Free-tie” VUA is a safer and more effective technique compared to interrupted suture technique during learning curve of LRP. According to our work, this technique allows surgeons with insufficient suturing experience to easily overcome the steep training curve.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

S. V Popov

Saint Petersburg Public Hospital of Saint Luca; S. M. Kirov Military Medical Academy; NorthWestern State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: doc.popov@gmail.com

I. N Orlov

Saint Petersburg Public Hospital of Saint Luca; NorthWestern State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: doc.orlov@gmail.com

I. V Sushina

Saint Petersburg Public Hospital of Saint Luca

Email: irasushina@yandex.ru

P. V Vjazovcev

Saint Petersburg Public Hospital of Saint Luca

Email: vpv.doc@gmail.com

E. A Grin’

Saint Petersburg Public Hospital of Saint Luca

Email: sv.lukaendouro@gmail.com

T. M Topuzov

Saint Petersburg Public Hospital of Saint Luca

Email: ttopuzov@dmail.com

S. M Malevich

Saint Petersburg Public Hospital of Saint Luca

Email: malevichsm@gmail.com

References

  1. Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Dikshit R., et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359-E386.
  2. Ficarra V. et al. Evidence from Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review. Eur. Urol. 2007;51:45-56.
  3. Novara G. et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:431-452.
  4. Gozen A.S., Tokas T., Akin Y., et al. Impact of barbed suture in controlling the dorsal vein complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24:108-113.
  5. Good D.W., Stewart G.D., Laird A. et al. A Critical Analysis of the Learning Curve and Postlearning Curve Outcomes of Two Experience- and Volume-Matched Surgeons for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2015;29:939-947.
  6. Good D.W., Stewart G.D., Stolzenburg J.U. et al. Analysis of the pentafecta learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2014;32:1225-1233.
  7. Galfano A., Di Trapani D., Sozzi F., et al. Beyond the learning curve of the Retzius-sparing approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of the first 200 patients with > 1 year of follow-up. Eur Urol. 2013;64: 974-980.
  8. Ma L.L., Ye J.F., Tang W.H. Knotless laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a preliminary experience. Chin Med J (Engl) 2015;128:409-412.
  9. Sooriakumaran P., Srivastava A., Shariat S.F., et al. A multinational, multi-institutional study comparing positive surgical margin rates among 22393 open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy patients. Eur Urol. 2014;66:450-456.
  10. Ficarra V., Novara G., Artibani W., et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1037-1063.
  11. Massoud W., Thanigasalam R., El H.A., et al. Does the use of a barbed polyglyconate absorbable suture have an impact on urethral anastomosis time, urethral stenosis rates, and cost effectiveness during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2013;82:90-94.
  12. Bai Y., Pu C., Yuan H., et al. ssessing the Impact of Barbed Suture on Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Minimally Invasive Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urology. 2015;85:1368-1375.
  13. Zhao Z., Zhu H., Yu H., et al. Comparison of intrafascial and non-intrafascial radical prostatectomy for low risk localized prostate cancer. Sci Rep. 2017;7:17604.
  14. Кочкин А.Д., Новиков А.Б., Галлямов Э.А. и др. Лапароскопическая радикальная простатэктомия и максимальное сохранение перипростатической анатомии. Вопросы урологии и андрологии. 2017;5(1):34-38. doi: 10.20953/2307-6631-2017-1-34-38

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies