Evaluation of the effectiveness of surgical treatment of recurrent urethral stricture


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. The recurrent course of the disease stricture is a complex problem for both the patient and the operating surgeon and requires an integrated approach to treatment only in expert centers. Purpose of the study. To assess the effectiveness of methods of surgical treatment of recurrent urethral strictures. Materials and methods. At the University Clinic of Urology, Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov, an analysis of the results of surgical treatment of patients with recurrent urethral stricture from 2012 to 2020 was carried out. This work included patients who underwent surgical treatment for recurrent urethral stricture. A total of 120 men were involved in the work. The median length of the stricture was (min-max) - 2 (0.5-16 cm). In 95 (79.1%) patients, stricture of the bulbous urethra, in 15 (12.5%) - in the penile urethra, in 2 (1.7%) patients had panurethral stricture, in 6 (5.0%) - membranous urethra and in 2 (1.7%) - meatus. All patients were divided into two groups: with recurrent urethral stricture after primary DVIU (group I, n=77) and recurrent urethral stricture after primary urethroplasty (group II, n= 43). Depending on the method of surgical treatment of recurrent urethral stricture, patients in group I were divided into 4 subgroups. Repeated DVIU + 3 months Autocatheterization - 16 (20.8%) patients; End-to-end urethroplasty - 37 (48.1%) patients; one-stage urethroplasty with a buccal graft or skin graft - 22 (28.6%) patients; multistage urethroplasty or perineostomy - 2 (2.5%) patients. Group II was also divided into 4 subgroups. DVIU - 17 (39.5%) patients; end-to-end urethroplasty - 6 (13.9%) patients; one-stage urethroplasty with a buccal graft or skin graft - 9 (20.9%) patients; multistage urethroplasty - 11 (16.7%) patients. Median Q max - 4.68 ml/sec. Preoperative cystostomy was observed in 31 (25.8%) patients. Results. The median follow-up was 24 months (range 12 to 76 months). Depending on the method of surgical treatment of recurrent urethral stricture, the effectiveness of DVIU according to strict indications was 75.7%. End-to-end urethroplasty showed an efficiency of -88,4%. One-stage augmentation urethroplasty had an efficiency of -77,4%, and multistage urethroplasty showed an efficiency of 84.6%. The IPSS value for the observation period 2 years was 2.6±0.9 points. The average value of Qmax at the time of observation was 19.4±7.1 ml/sec. The effectiveness of the treatment was 82%. During the follow-up period, a relapse was noted in 22 (18%) patients. The overall effectiveness of the treatment of recurrent urethral stricture, taking into account the treatment of recurrent cases of disease recurrence, was 97.5%. Conclusions. Urethroplasty is the treatment of choice for recurrent urethral strictures, which has been shown to be more effective than DVIU. However, the results of urethroplasty for recurrent strictures are worse than for primary strictures.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

S. V Kotov

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital №1

Email: urokotov@mail.ru
MD, Chairman Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

M. M Iritsyan

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital №1

Email: misha-res@yandex.ru
PhD, assistant of the Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

A. G Yusufov

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital №1

Email: anvar.yusufov@mail.ru
PhD, Associate Professor of the Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

E. Kh Abdulkhalygov

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University; N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital №1

Email: eldarovich.uro@mail.ru
assistant of the Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

A. A Klimenko

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: dr.klimenkoaa@yandex.ru.131
resident, Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

N. D Korochkin

N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: nikoro4kin@yandex.ru
Resident, Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Котов С.В., Беломытцев С.В., Суренков Д.Н., и др. Внутренняя оптическая уретротомия: эффективность и место в современной урологии. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2017;2:112-116
  2. Пушкарь Д.Ю., Живов А.В., Лоран О.Б., и др. Сравнительная частота и факторы риска рецидива стриктуры уретры при различных методах оперативного лечения. Андрология и генитальная хирургия. 2012;13(4):37-44. https://doi.org/10.17650/2070-9781-2012-4-37-44)
  3. Meeks J.J., Erickson B.A., Granieri M.A., et al. Stricture recurrence after urethroplasty: a systematic review. J Urol 2009;182:1266-1270.
  4. Tolkach Y., Herrmann T., Merseburger A., et al. Development of a clinical algorithm for treating urethral strictures based on a large retrospective single-center cohort. F1000Res. 2016; 5:2378. Published 2016 Sep 26. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.9427.2.
  5. Котов С.В. Анастомотическая уретропластика без пересечения спонгиозного тела - новый метод уретропластики для лечения коротких стриктур бульбозного отдела уретры. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2015;3:68-71
  6. Barbagli G., Montorsi F., Bald S., et al. Treatments of 1242 bulbar urethral strictures: multivariable statistical analysis of results. World J Urol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2481-6
  7. Sukumar S., Elliott S.P., Myers J.B., et al. Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Endoscopic Management of Stricture Recurrence after Bulbar Urethroplasty. J Urol. 2018t;200(4):837-842. Doi: 10.1016/j. juro.2018.04.081.
  8. Rosenbaum C.M., Schmid M., Ludwig T.A. et al. Internal urethrotomy in patients with recurrent urethral stricture after buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty. World J Urol. 2015;33(9): 1337-1344. Doi: 10.1007/ s00345-014-1450-y.
  9. Brown E.T., Mock S., Dmochowski R., et al. Direct visual internal urethrotomy for isolated, post-urethroplasty strictures: a retrospective analysis. Ther Adv Urol. 2016;9(2):39-44.
  10. Goulao B., Carnell S., Shen J. et al. Surgical Treatment for Recurrent Bulbar Urethral Stricture: A Randomised Open-label Superiority Trial of Open Urethroplasty Versus Endoscopic Urethrotomy (the OPEN Trial). European Urology. 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.003.
  11. Shau Y., Wu S., Kao C., et аі Management of complex urethral stricture disease: algorithm and experience from a single institute. Urol Sci 2015;26(3):210-213.
  12. Ekerhult T., Lindqvist K., Peeker R., et. al. Outcomes of reintervention after failed urethroplasty. Scand J Urol. 2016;51(1):68-72.
  13. Коган М.И., Красулин В.В., Митусов В.В. и др. Оперативное лечение стриктур и облитераций уретры. Урология. 2015;2:17-23
  14. Imbeault A., Bugeja S., Frost A., et. al. The outcome of redo bulbar and membranous urethroplasty. Eur Urol Suppl. 2014;13(1):e82.
  15. Javali T., Katti A., Nagaraj H. Management of recurrent anterior urethral strictures following buccal mucosal graft-urethroplasty: a single center experience. Urol Ann. 2016; 8(1):31.
  16. Grant A., Ahmadi N., Wong J. Outcomes of redo-urethroplasty in patients with prior failed urethral reconstruction surgery. BJU Int Suppl. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13751
  17. Sevinc C., Balaban M., Ozkaptan O. et al. Salvage urethroplasty using skin grafts for previously failed long-segment urethral strictures. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2016;32(9):464-468.
  18. Pandey A., Borisenkov M., Barta-Kelemen A. et. al. Re-do urethroplasty after unsuccessful urethral reconstruction with buccal mucosa graft. Eur Urol Suppl. 2017;16(3):e485.
  19. Котов С.В. Результаты многоэтапной (заместительной) уретропластики. Экспериментальная и клиническая урология. 2015;4:60-66
  20. Morrison C., Cina D., Gonzalez C. et al Surgical approaches and long-term outcomes in adults with complex reoperative hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1296-1301

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies