Penile glans amputation during circumcision: causes, treatments and preventive measures


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Penile glans amputation during circumcision is a rare but potentially devastating complication. The mechanism and causes are poorly understood and incomprehensible. It is important to identify the causes of these complications, to suggest a mechanism and to propose prevention measures. Materials. Between 2005 and 2019, six patients with penile glans amputationafter circumcision were analyzed. All were operated without medical evidence, for religious reasons. The results. The operations were performed by local anesthesia, at home - in 5 patients, in 1 child - at polyclinic. All children were circumcised by scalpel with guillotine method, without visualization of glans. Partial amputation of penile glans was observed in 2 children (33.3%). Complete cut-off of the glans at the level of the coronal sulcus was revealed in 4 boys (66.6%). Meatoplasty with urethral mobilizations was performed 2 patients (33.3%) with partial amputation. The tops of corpus cavernous was covered of with the remnants of the skin of penile shaft in two boys (33.3%). Glansplasty was performed in 2 other patients (33/3%), using a labial mucosa graft to reconstruct the shape of glans and glanular groove. The follow up have showed meatostenosis in two boys (33.3%) in the first 2 months after surgery. One child required repeated meatoplasty (16.6%), another had a recovery of normal urine flow rates after urethral dilatation and stenting (4 weeks). Conclusion. Visual control of the glans position during circumcision will prevent the amputation. «Guillotine» techniques including, Mogen clamp-type devices, are considered potentially dangerous. Circumcision in newborns, without general anesthesia, in the presence of swelling of the foreskin have an increased risk of glans damage. Preliminary examination of the glans and adequate release of preputial adhesions help to prevent complication of circumcision and to identify combined malformations (hypospadia, epispadia, concealed penis.)

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Y. E Rudin

N.A. Lopatkin’s Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - a branch of the FSBU «NMSC of Radiology» MH of the Russian Federation

Email: rudin761@yandex.ru
chief of pediatric urology group of the reconstructive urology department Moscow, Russia

V. I Runenko

St. Vladimir Children Hospital DSM

Email: dexon@mail.ru
Moscow, Russia

D. V Marukhinenko

N.A. Lopatkin’s Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - a branch of the FSBU «NMSC of Radiology» MH of the Russian Federation

Email: dimamarukhnenko@yandex.ru
head of Department of pediatric urology Moscow, Russia

D. K Aliev

N.A. Lopatkin’s Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology - a branch of the FSBU «NMSC of Radiology» MH of the Russian Federation

Email: j.k.aliev@gmail.com
junior researcher ofDepartment of pediatric urology Moscow, Russia

A. Y Rudin

St. Vladimir Children Hospital DSM

Email: andrey-rudin@mail.ru
Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Pippi Salle J., Jesus L., Lorenzo A., et al. Glans amputation during routine neonatal circumcision: Mechanism of injury and strategy for prevention. J PediatrUrol. 2013;9(6):763-768.
  2. Ceylan K., Burhan K., Yilmaz Y., et ll. Severe complications of circumcision: an analysis of 48 cases. J PediatrUrol. 2007;3(1):32-35.
  3. Okeke L.I., Asinobi A.A., Ikuerowo O.S. Epidemiology of complications of male circumcision in Ibadan, Nigeria. BMC Urol. 2006;6:21.
  4. Bahnasawy M.S., Sherbiny M.T. Paediatric penile trauma. BJU Int. 2002;90(1):92-96.
  5. Harrison N.W., Eshleman J.L., Ngugi P.M. Ethical issues in the developing world. Br J Urol. 1995;76(2):93-96.
  6. Муртузаалиев З.Н., Махачев Б.М., Муртузаалиев Н.П. Проблемы и пути решения медицинских аспектов обряда обрезания. Российский вестник детской хирургии, анестезиологии и реаниматологии, 2018;8(2):48-55) doi: 10.30946/2219-4061-2018-8-2-48-55
  7. Strimling B.S. Partial amputation of glans penis during Mogen clamp circumcision. Pediatrics. 1996;97(6 Pt1):906-907.
  8. Kaweblum Y.A., Press S., Kogan L., et. all. Circumcision using the Mogen clamp. ClinPediatr (Phila). 1984;23(12):679-682.
  9. Sasmaz I., Antmen B., Leblebisatan G., et. all. Circumcisio n and complications in patients with haemophilia in southern part of Turkey: Qukurova experience. Haemophilia. 2012;18(3):426-430. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2011.02706.x
  10. Peleg D., Steiner A. The Gomco circumcision: common problems and solutions. Am Fam Physician. 1998;58(4):891-898.
  11. Хинман Ф.Х. Оперативная урология: Пер. с англ. М.: ГЭОТАР-МЕД, 2001. 1192. С. 181-186 с.: ил. ISBN 5-9231-0055-Х. Иллюстрированное руководство
  12. Gluckman G.R., Stoller M.L., Jacobs M.M., et. all. Newborn penile glans amputation during circumcision and successful reattachment. J Urol. 1995;153(3 Pt 1):778с79.
  13. Sherman J., Borer J.G., Horowitz M. Glassberg Circumcision: successful glanular reconstruction and survival following traumatic amputation. J Urol. 1996;156(2 Pt 2):842-844.
  14. Dieth A.G., Moh-Ello N., Fiogbe M., et. all. Accidents of circumcision in children in Abidjan, Cöte d’Ivoire. Bull SocPatholExot. 2008;101(4):314-315.
  15. Sylla C., Diao B., Diallo A.B., et al. Complications of circumcision. Report of 63 cases. ProgUrol. 2003;13(2):266-272.
  16. Magoha G.A. Circumcision in various Nigerian and Kenyan hospitals. East Afr Med J. 1996;76(10):583-586.
  17. Weiss H.A., Larke N., Halperin D., Schenker I. Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review. BMC Urol. 2010;10:2.
  18. Coskunfirat O.K., Sayilkan S., Velidedeoglu H. Glans and penile skin amputation as a complication of circumcision. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;43(4):457.
  19. Ozkan S., Gürpinar T. A serious circumcision complication: penile shaft amputation and a new reattachment technique with a successful outcome. J Urol. 1997;158(5):1946-1947.
  20. Baskin L.S., Canning D.A., Snyder H.M., et al. Surgical repair of urethral circumcision injuries. J Urol. 1997;158(6):2269с71.
  21. Palminter E.I., Berdondini E., Lazzeri M., et al. Resurfacing and reconstruction of the glans penis. EurUrol. 2007;52(3):893-898.
  22. Cook A., Khoury A.E., Bägli D.J., et al. Use of buccal mucosa to simulate the coronal sulcus after traumatic penile amputation. Urology. 2005;66(5):1109.
  23. Hanash K.A. Plastic reconstruction of partially amputated penis at circumcision. Urology. 1981;18(3):291-93.
  24. Рудин Ю.Э., Конома С.М., Аникиев А.В. Методы лечения патологии крайней плоти в детском возрасте. Урология. 2007;4:85-91). Поступила 02.07.20 Принята в печать 26.04.21 Received 02.07.20 Accepted 26

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies