COMBINATION THERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF URINARY DISORDERS AFTER TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Introduction. Surgery in patients with large prostates due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) results in severe dysuria manifesting as frequent or urgent need to urinate and urinary incontinence. Traditionally, these conditions are treated with alpha blockers. Recently, alphablockers and the anticholinergic combination have been used showing additional advantages. This study aimed to investigate the comparative effectiveness of monotherapy versus combination therapy in the treatment of postoperative dysuria in BPH patients with large prostates undergoing transurethral surgery. Materials and methods. From September 2016 to March 2017, 94 BPH patients with prostates greater than 100 cc underwent transurethral surgery at the Department of Urology of D.D. Pletnev Clinical Hospital; 22 patients had exclusion criteria. In the postoperative period, 36 patients received 0.4 mg of modified release tamsulosin (Omnik®) for a month, and 36 patients were administered controlled release tablets tamsulosin 0.4 mg + solifenacin 6 mg (Vezomni®) as fixed-dose combination therapy. At one month postoperatively, patients were asked to rate their symptoms on a visual analogue scale and fill out I-PSS and QoL questionnaires. Preoperative parameters of the groups were: visual analogue scale scores were 5.1 and 5.2, I-PSS scores were 24 and 24.2, QoL scores were 4.5 in both groups. Prostate volumes were 114 and 118 cc; maximum urinary flow rates were 7.7 vs. 7.5 ml/sec, residual urine volumes were 110 vs. 105 ml, respectively. Results. Visual analogue scale scores were 6.5 versus 9.2 points, I-PSS scores were 16.3 versus 12.1. The patients of the second group had greater mean micturition volume (150 versus 240 ml); other variables did not differ statistically significantly between the groups. Adverse reactions were mild, and drugs were not discontinued in any case. Conclusion. In BPH patients with dysuria after transurethral resection of large prostates, Vezomni® administration results in a better quality of life due to an improvement in urgency and nocturia.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

D. V Ergakov

D.D. Pletnev City Clinical Hospital

Email: dergakov@mail.ru
Ph.D., Urologist at the Department of Minimally Invasive Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment of Urologic Diseases «MMDiL»

A. G Martov

IPPE of A.I. Burnazyan SSC FMBC, FMBA of Russia; D.D. Pletnev City Clinical Hospital

Email: martovalex@mail.ru
Head of Department of Urology and Andrology; Dr.Med.Sci., Prof., Head of Department of Minimally Invasive Methods of Diagnosis and Treatment of Urologic Diseases "MMDiL"

References

  1. Roberts R.O., Jacobsen S.J., Jacobson D.J., Reilly W.T., Talley N.J., Lieber M.M. Natural history of prostatism: high American urological association symptom scores among community-dwelling men and women with urinary incontinence. Urology. 1998;51(2): 213-219.
  2. Wasson J.H., Reda D.J., Bruskewitz R.C., Elinson J., Keller A.M., Henderson W.G. A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on transurethral resection of the prostate. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(2):75-79.
  3. Han H.H., Ko W.J., Yoo T.K. et al. Factors associated with continuing medical therapy after transurethral resection of prostate. Urology. 2014;84(3):675-680.
  4. Мартов А.Г., Гущин Б.Л., Ергаков Д.В., Ощепков В.Н. Улучшение результатов оперативного лечения больных с доброкачественной гиперплазией предстательной железы посредством применения альфа^адреноблокаторов в послеоперационном периоде. Урология. 2002;5:23-37.
  5. Rassweiler J., Teber D., Kuntz R., Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) - incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006;50(5):969-980.
  6. Athanasopoulos A., Chapple C., Fowler C. et al. The role of antimuscarinics in the management of men with symptoms of overactive bladder associated with concomitant bladder outlet obstruction: an update. Eur Urol. 2011;60(1):94-105.
  7. Gadzhieva Z.K. Urodynamic studies in the diagnosis and treatment of urinary disorders. Dr.Med.Sci. Thesis. M., 2009.
  8. Gravas S., Bach T., Drake M. et al. Treatment of Non-neurogenic Male LUTS http://www.uroweb.org/guideline/treatment-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/
  9. Min D.S., Cho H.J., Kang J.Y., Yoo T.K., Cho J.M. Effect of transurethral resection of the prostate based on the degree of obstruction seen in urodynamic study. Korean J Urol. 2013;54(12):840-845.
  10. Kang Y.J., Kim K.H., Seo Y., Lee K.S. Effect of transurethral resection of the prostate on storage symptoms in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia of less than 30 ml. World J Mens Health. 2013;31(1):64-69.
  11. Chapple C.R., Smith D. The pathophysiological changes in the bladder obstructed by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Br J Urol. 1994;73(2):117-123.
  12. Li M.C., Wang Z.Y., Yang J. et al. Efficacy and safety of solifenacin plus tamsulosin oral controlled absorption system in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2015;17(1): 124-134.
  13. Hao N., Tian Y., Liu W. et al. Antimuscarinics and alpha-blockers or alpha-blockers monotherapy on lower urinary tract symptoms - a metaanalysis. Urology. 2014;83:556-562.
  14. Johnson T.M. 2nd, Markland A.D., Goode P.S. et al. Efficacy of adding behavioural treatment or antimuscarinic drug therapy to alphablocker therapy in men with nocturia. BJU Int. 2013;112:100-108.
  15. Kaplan S.A., Roehrborn C.G., Abrams P., Chapple C.R., Bavendam T., Guan Z. Antimuscarinics for treatment of storage lower urinary tract symptoms in men: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65(4):487-507.
  16. Xin Z., Huang Y., Lu J., Zhang Q., Chen C. Addition of antimuscarinics to alpha-blockers for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men: a meta-analysis. Urology. 2013;82(2):270-277.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies