SOLITARY STONES OF THE LOWER RENAL CALYX: HOW TO TREAT?

Introduction The choice of treatment for the stones of the lower renal calyx is one of the challenging issues of modern urology. The aim of this retrospective and prospective study was to investigate the clinical effectiveness and safety of 3 modern minimally invasive techniques for treating renal stones: percutaneous (PNL) and transurethral (TNL) nephrolithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in patients with solitary lower calyx stones sized from 10 to 15 mm. Materials and methods The study included 136 patients with symptomatic stones of the lower calyces, who underwent ESWL, PNL and TNL from November 2010 to the present day. The criteria for inclusion in the study were: the presence of a solitary stone of the lower calyx, the stone size of 10 mm to 15 mm, the performance of the classical (standard) PNL in the prone position (puncture access 28-30 Fr) and the follow-up examination at 3 months after the operation. Forty-six patients underwent ESWL, 49 - PNL, and 41 - TNL. Postoperative follow-up was done at 3 months and included a plain radiography, ultrasound and non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The stone free rate (SFR) was used as a criterion for the effectiveness of the intervention, where the stone size of 3 mm was taken as the upper limit for the possible presence of fragments. Besides, the rate of repeat interventions, complications and subjective assessment of patients’ treatment satisfaction (0 to 10) by using visual analogue scale (VAS) were investigated. Results The effectiveness analysis of the three methods for treating the lower calyx stones sized 10-15 mm showed that PNL was no more effective than TNL (SFR 95.9% and 85.4%, respectively), but both methods were significantly more effective than ESWL (SFR 69.5%). 29.3% of patients who underwent TNL required repeat interventions (TNL or ESWL), while among those treated with ESWL, 45.6% required repeat ESWL sessions. PNL resulted in stone clearance in one stage. Postoperative inflammatory complications were most prevalent among patients who underwent TNL (26.8%). Bleeding requiring hemotransfusion was observed only after PNL (14.3%). Obstructive complications were observed in all study groups. For them, internal stenting was most often performed after ESWL (10.9%), puncture nephrostomy - after TNL (7.3%). Statistically significantly higher VAS measured quality of life was found after ESWL (7.9) and PNL (7.0) compared with THL (4.8). Conclusion All three methods (PNL, TNL and ESWL) for treating lower calyceal stones sized from 10 to 15 mm are quite effective. Using them separately or in combination allows most patients to safely achieve a stone-free state.

percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, transurethral nephrolithotripsy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, efficacy, safety