Minimally invasive enucleation of the prostate (MILEP) with thulium fiber laser: preliminary results
- Authors: Petov V.S.1, Dymov A.M.1, Azilgareeva С.R.1, Mustafin M.A.1, Enikeev M.E.1, Sukhanov R.B.1, Li Y.A.1, Chuvalov L.L.1, Tsarichenko D.G.1, Gazimiev M.A.1, Rapoport L.M.1, De Figueiredo F.C.2
-
Affiliations:
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
- Pompéia Hospital
- Issue: No 3 (2025)
- Pages: 28-33
- Section: Original Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1728-2985/article/view/687827
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/urology.2025.3.28-33
- ID: 687827
Cite item
Abstract
Introduction. Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate is the standard surgical treatment for patients with BPH >80 cc. Despite its efficiency, the incidence of stress urinary incontinence (<6 months) and urethral stricture remains significant at 16.6–29.4% and 1.7–6.5%, respectively. The use of smaller instruments can potentially reduce the rates of these complications.
Aim. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency and safety of minimally invasive laser enucleation of the prostate (MiLEP) using a thulium fiber laser (TFL).
Materials and methods. A prospective study was initiated in March 2024. The inclusion criteria were severe lower urinary tract symptoms (IPSS >20) and/or Qmax <15 ml/s or the necessity for bladder drainage. MiLEP was performed using 22 Ch resectoscope and TFL FIBERLASE U1 and FIBERLASE U-MAX (NTO IRE-Polus, Russia) with the following settings: 1.5 J and 50–55 Hz and 1.7–2 J and 40–45 Hz (DissectPulse). MiLEP technique was en bloc no-touch enucleation with early apical release. Peri- and early postoperative outcomes and complication rates were assessed.
Results. MiLEP was performed in 15 patients with a median age of 67 years (IQR 62.5; 69.5), prostate volume of 61 cc (IQR 46.5; 65.5), and IPSS score was 25.5 (IQR 23.3; 27), Qmax was 5.3 ml/s (IQR 4.5; 9.3). The median duration of the procedure was 42 min (IQR 37; 55), enucleation was 25 min (IQR 21; 28), and morcellation was 7.5 min (IQR 4; 8). Enucleation efficiency was 1.2 g/min (IQR 1; 1.5) and morcellation efficiency was 5.3 g/min (IQR 4.6; 7.7). The median hemoglobin drop was 6.5 g/l (IQR 1.5; 12.8) and the mass of removed tissue was 34 g (IQR 25; 42). The median catheterization and hospitalization time were 2 days (IQR 2; 2.8) and 3 days (IQR 3; 6), respectively. After 1 month, the median IPSS score was 5 (IQR 4; 6; р < 0.001), Qmax was 18.7 ml/s (IQR 18; 21; р < 0.001). Complications were observed in 5 (33.3%) patients (grade I according to Clavien-Dindo). Stress urinary incontinence occurred in 2 (13.3%) patients on the first day after catheter removal, but in none at 1 month after MiLEP.
Conclusion. Minimally invasive enucleation of the prostate with a thulium fiber laser can be considered an effective and safe surgical treatment option for patients with BPH.
Full Text

About the authors
Vladislav S. Petov
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Author for correspondence.
Email: pettow@mail.ru
Ph.D., assistant, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health
Russian Federation, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya str., 2, building 1. Moscow, 119991Alim M. Dymov
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Email: dymov_a_m@staff.sechenov.ru
Ph.D., MD, Professor, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health
Russian Federation, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya str., 2, building 1. Moscow, 119991Сamilla R. Azilgareeva
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Email: camilla.azilgareeva@yandex.ru
Ph.D. student, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health
Russian Federation, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya str., 2, building 1. Moscow, 119991Mansur A. Mustafin
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Email: mustafout@gmail.com
Student, Institute for Clinical Medicine named after N.V. Sklifosovsky
Russian Federation, 119021, Moscow, Rossolimo st., 11, building 2Mikhail E. Enikeev
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Email: enikeev_m_e@staff.sechenov.ru
Ph.D., MD, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health
Russian Federation, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya str., 2, building 1. Moscow, 119991Roman B. Sukhanov
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Email: sukhanov_r_b@staff.sechenov.ru
Ph.D., MD, Associate Professor, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health
Russian Federation, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya str., 2, building 1. Moscow, 119991Yulia A. Li
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Email: li_yu_a@staff.sechenov.ru
Ph.D. student, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health
Russian Federation, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya str., 2, building 1. Moscow, 119991Leonid L. Chuvalov
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Email: chuvalov_l_l@staff.sechenov.ru
urologist, assistant, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health
Russian Federation, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya str., 2, building 1. Moscow, 119991Dmitry G. Tsarichenko
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Email: tsarichenko_d_g@staff.sechenov.ru
Ph.D., MD, professor, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health
Russian Federation, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya str., 2, building 1. Moscow, 119991Magomed A. Gazimiev
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Email: gazimiev_m_a@staff.sechenov.ru
Ph.D., MD, professor, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health
Russian Federation, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya str., 2, building 1. Moscow, 119991Leonid M. Rapoport
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
Email: rapoport_l_m@staff.sechenov.ru
Ph.D., MD, professor, Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health
Russian Federation, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya str., 2, building 1. Moscow, 119991Felipe Carvalho De Figueiredo
Pompéia Hospital
Email: HoLEPBrasil@hotmail.com
urologist, Department of Urology
Brazil, Caxias do SulReferences
- EAU Guidelines. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Paris April 2024. ISBN 978-94-92671-23-3. Accessed: May 14, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/management-of-non-neurogenic-male-luts/chapter/citation-information
- Sandhu JS, Bixler BR, Dahm P, Goueli R, Kirkby E, Stoffel JT, Wilt TJ. Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Attributed to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH): AUA Guideline Amendment 2023. J Urol. 2024 Jan;211(1):11-19. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003698. Epub 2023 Sep 14. PMID: 37706750.
- Chen CH, Chung CH, Chu HC, Chen KC, Ho CH. Surgical outcome of anatomical endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Andrologia. 2020 Sep;52(8):e13612. doi: 10.1111/and.13612. Epub 2020 May 12. PMID: 32400026.
- Iqbal J, Mashkoor Y, Nadeem A, Tah S, Sharifa M, Ghani S, Thugu TR, Patel H, Bonner-Reid FT, Shrestha J, Hassen BA. Shifting Trends in Prostate Treatment: A Systematic Review Comparing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate. Cureus. 2023 Sep 29;15(9):e46173. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46173. PMID: 37905244; PMCID: PMC10613322.
- Abdelaziz A, Bhandari M, Elshabrawy A, Trecarten S, Dalla EE, Samara KA, Alsayegh F, Liss M, Mansour AM. Contemporary Trends of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Utilization in the United States: A Comprehensive Analysis Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database (2011-2020). J Endourol. 2024 May;38(5):521-528. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0612. PMID: 38299559.
- Weinstein IC, Wu X, Arenas-Gallo C, Zhu A, Brant A, Al Awamlh BAH, Gaffney C, Lee R, Zell M, Jaeger I, Ponsky L, Shoag J. Adoption and Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the United States. Urology. 2023 Sep;179:106-111. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.028. Epub 2023 Jun 14. PMID: 37328009.
- Fraundorfer MR, Gilling PJ. Holmium:YAG laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: preliminary results. Eur Urol. 1998;33(1):69-72. doi: 10.1159/000019535. PMID: 9471043.
- Miernik A, Schoeb DS. «Three horse shoe-like incision» holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: first experience with a novel en bloc technique for anatomic transurethral prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2019 Mar;37(3):523-528. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2418-0. Epub 2018 Jul 23. PMID: 30039386.
- Tunc L, Yalcin S, Kaya E, Gazel E, Yılmaz S, Aybal HC, Yılmaz M, Tokas T. The «Omega Sign»: a novel HoLEP technique that improves continence outcomes after enucleation. World J Urol. 2021 Jan;39(1):135-141. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03152-9. Epub 2020 Mar 19. PMID: 32193652.
- Herrmann TRW, Wolters M. Transurethral anatomical enucleation of the prostate with Tm:YAG support (ThuLEP): Evolution and variations of the technique. The inventors’ perspective. Andrologia. 2020 Sep;52(8):e13587. doi: 10.1111/and.13587. Epub 2020 Apr 14. PMID: 32286719.
- Scoffone CM, Cracco CM. The en-bloc no-touch holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) technique. World J Urol. 2016 Aug;34(8):1175-81. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1741-y. Epub 2015 Dec 11. PMID: 26658753.
- Saitta G, Becerra JEA, Del Álamo JF, González LL, Elbers JR, Suardi N, Gómez-Sancha F. ‘En Bloc’ HoLEP with early apical release in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. World J Urol. 2019 Nov;37(11):2451-2458. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02671-4. Epub 2019 Feb 8. PMID: 30734073.
- Herrmann T.R.W. Enucleation is enucleation is enucleation is enucleation. World Journal of Urology. 2016;34(10):1353–1355. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1922-3.
- Enikeev DV, Glybochko PV, Alyaev YG, Rapoport LM, Vinarov AZ, Enikeev ME, Sorokin NI, Spivak LG, Sukhanov RB, Dymov AM, Khamraev OK, Taratkin MS, Davydov DS, Vinnichenko VA. [Current laser technologies for the surgical treatment of prostatic hyperplasia]. Urologiia. 2017 Apr;(1):108-113. Russian. doi: 10.18565/urol.2017.1.108-113. PMID: 28394533.
- Petov V, Babaevskaya D, Taratkin M, Chuvalov L, Lusuardi L, Misrai V, Sukhanov R, Scoffone CM, Enikeev D. Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Prospective Study of Mid- and Long-Term Outcomes in 1328 Patients. J Endourol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1231-1236. doi: 10.1089/end.2022.0029. Epub 2022 Aug 2. PMID: 35414204.
- Enikeev D, Taratkin M, Morozov A, Singla N, Gabdulina S, Tarasov A, Sukhanov R, Rivas JG, Laukhtina E, Arshiev M, Mikhailov V, Glybochko P. Long-Term Outcomes of Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A 5-Year Single-Center Experience. J Endourol. 2020 Oct;34(10):1055-1063. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0347. Epub 2020 Aug 4. PMID: 32597216.
- Cornwell LB, Smith GE, Paonessa JE. Predictors of Postoperative Urinary Incontinence After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: 12 Months Follow-Up. Urology. 2019 Feb;124:213-217. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.032. Epub 2018 Dec 4. PMID: 30528716.
- Taha T, Savin Z, Lifshitz K, Veredgorn Y, Mendelson T, Bar-Yosef Y, Yossepowitch O, Sofer M. Mini-HoLEP (MILEP) vs HoLEP: a propensity score-matched analysis. World J Urol. 2023 Oct;41(10):2801-2807. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04562-1. Epub 2023 Aug 25. PMID: 37626182.
- Pirola GM, Castellani D, Lim EJ, Wroclawski ML, Le Quy Nguyen D, Gubbiotti M, Rubilotta E, Chan VW, Corrales M, García Rojo E, Herrmann TRW, Teoh JY, Gauhar V. Urethral stricture following endoscopic prostate surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective, randomized trials. World J Urol. 2022 Jun;40(6):1391-1411. doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-03946-z. Epub 2022 Feb 13. PMID: 35152322.
- Park JK, Kim JY, You JH, Choi BR, Kam SC, Kim MK, Jeong YB, Shin YS. Effect of preoperative urethral dilatation on preventing urethral stricture after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: A randomized controlled study. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Nov;13(11):E357-E360. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5781. PMID: 30817290; PMCID: PMC6877364.
- Castellani D, Antonucci M, Signoretti M, Cipriani C, Vittori M, Bertolo R, Gasparri L, Dellabella M, Bove P. Urethral and bladder neck stenosis after thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: Analysis of risk factors in a series of 1003 patients. Andrologia. 2022 Oct;54(9):e14523. doi: 10.1111/and.14523. Epub 2022 Jul 4. PMID: 35789109.
- Günes M, Keles MO, Kaya C, Koca O, Sertkaya Z, Akyüz M, Altok M, Umul M, Karaman MI. Does resectoscope size play a role in formation of urethral stricture following transurethral prostate resection? Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):744-9. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0093. PMID: 26401868; PMCID: PMC4757004.
- Chen J, Wang M, Wang S, Sun P, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Jin X. 160-Watt lithium triboride laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of prostate: a prospective nonrandomized two-center trial. Urology. 2012 Mar;79(3):650-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.039. PMID: 22386419.
- de Figueiredo F.C.A., Teloken P.E. Minimally invasive Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (MiLEP): Slim (22Ch) and Ultra Slim (18.5Ch) HoLEP. Urol Video J. 2022;14:100146. doi: 10.1016/j.urolvj.2022.100146.
- Gross AJ, Netsch C, Knipper S, Hölzel J, Bach T. Complications and early postoperative outcome in 1080 patients after thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate: results at a single institution. Eur Urol. 2013 May;63(5):859-67. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.048. Epub 2012 Dec 1. PMID: 23245687.
- Mamoulakis C, Efthimiou I, Kazoulis S, Christoulakis I, Sofras F. The modified Clavien classification system: a standardized platform for reporting complications in transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol. 2011 Apr;29(2):205-10. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0566-y. Epub 2010 May 12. PMID: 20461386; PMCID: PMC3062770.
- Ibis MA, Tokatlı Z. Does the use of a small-size resectoscope during enucleation prevent transient urinary leakage and urethral stricture following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate? Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2022 Mar;14(2):86-91. doi: 10.1111/luts.12414. Epub 2021 Nov 8. PMID: 34751494.
- Yildiz A., Akdemir S., Anil H., Guzel A., Arslan M. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Urethral Complications Between Using 24-French and 26-French Resectoscope Sheaths in Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate. Haseki Tip Bulteni. 2022;60(2):127–132. doi: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2022.8104.
- Dean NS, Lee MS, Assmus MA, Guo J, Xu P, McDonald A, Fadl-Alla A, Helin J, Krambeck AE. Does Resectoscope Sheath Size Influence Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate Outcomes? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Endourol. 2023 Dec;37(12):1261-1269. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0383. PMID: 37786336.
- Ruszat R, Seitz M, Wyler SF, Abe C, Rieken M, Reich O, Gasser TC, Bachmann A. GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate: single-center experience and long-term results after 500 procedures. Eur Urol. 2008 Oct;54(4):893-901. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.04.053. Epub 2008 Apr 30. PMID: 18486311.
- Gu X, Strom K, Spaliviero M, Wong C. Intermediate outcomes of GreenLight HPS™ laser photoselective vaporization prostatectomy for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol. 2011 Jun;25(6):1037-41. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0512. Epub 2011 May 16. PMID: 21574860.
- Shalaby EA. Assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel approach during transurethral pneumatic cystolithotripsy in large urinary bladder stone: quasi-clinical trial. Urolithiasis. 2022 Apr;50(2):189-197. doi: 10.1007/s00240-021-01294-y. Epub 2021 Dec 1. PMID: 34853892.
Supplementary files
