A comparative analysis of the results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and laparoscopic pyelolithotomy


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Introduction. Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PNL) is considered as the main treatment method of patients with large and staghorn kidney stones. In some cases, laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) may be an alternative option to PNL. The aim of our work was to compare the results of these surgical methods for treatment of large pelvis stones. Materials and methods. The results of surgical treatment of 60 patients with large pelvis stones were reviewed. In 40 patients (66.7%) PNL were performed, while in 20 cases (33.3%) LP were done. In the PNL group, the average stone size was 2.7 (2.5-3.8) cm and in the LP group it was 3.0 (2.6-4.2) cm. Four patients in the LP group had kidney malrotation, one patient had pelvic dystopia, and in another case a horseshoe kidney was diagnosed. The operative time and stone-free rate, intra- and postoperative complications, the amount of blood loss and the length of hospitalization were compared. Results. There was no conversion in both groups. There were no significant differences in the mean length of hospitalization (4.5+1.5 vs 4.4+1.4 days) and analgesic use (2.2+0.9 vs 2.4+1.0 days) and stone-free rate (100 vs 90%) between groups. The mean operative time was significantly higher at the PL (110.0+25.0 vs 65.4+24.5 min; p<0.05), but the amount of blood loss was significantly lower (70+28 versus 160.0+55 ml; p<0.05) compared to the PNL group. Conclusions. PNL remains the main treatment method for patients with large kidney stones. However, abnormal kidneys, concomitant ureteropelvic junction obstruction or endoscopic treatment failure can be indications to LP.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

B. Guliev

FGBOU VO North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; Center of Urology with robot-assisted surgery of City Mariinsky hospital

Email: gulievbg@mail.ru
MD, professor at the department of urology; Head

B. Komyakov

FGBOU VO North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Email: komyakovbk@mail.ru
MD, professor, Head of the department of urology

A. Zaikin

FGBOU VO North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov

Ph.D. student at the department of urology

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. Honeck P., Wendt-Nordahl G., Krombach P. et al. Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center. J. Endourol. 2009;23:1209-1212.
  2. Lange L., Terlecki R. Persistence of open stone surgery in the United States in the 21st century. J. Endourol. 2017;31(11):1211-1214.
  3. Turk C., Petrik A., Sarica K., Seitz C., Skolarikos A., Straub M., Knoll T. EAU Guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur. Urol 2016;69(3):475-482.
  4. Гулиев Б.Г. Осложнения перкутанной нефролитотрипсии. Эндоскопическая хирургия. 2008; 1:33-35
  5. El-Nahas A.R., Shokeir A.A., El-Assmy A.M. et al. Post-percutaneous nephrolithotomy extensive hemorrhage: a study of risk factors. J. Urol. 2007;177(2):576-579.
  6. Mariappan P., Smith G., Bariol S.V. et al. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective clinical study. J. Urol. 2005;173:1610-1614.
  7. Seitz C., Desai M., Hacker A., Hakenberg O.W. et al. Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol. 2012;61(1):146-158.
  8. Koras O., Bozkurt I.H., Yonguc T. et al. Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A prospective clinical study. Urolithiasis. 2015;4:55-60.
  9. Rivera M., Viers B., Cockerill P., Agarwal D., Mehta R.,Krambeck A. Pre-and postoperative predictors of infection-related complications in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2016;30(9):982-986.
  10. Turna B., Umul M., Demiryoguran S. et al. How do increasing stone surface area and stone configuration affect overall outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J. Endourol. 2007;21:34-43.
  11. Goel A., Hemal A.K. Evaluation of role of retroperitoneoscopic pyelolithotomy and its comparison with percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2003;35:73-76.
  12. Nadu A., Schatloff O., Morag R. et al. Laparoscopic surgery for renal stones: is it indicated in the modern endourology era? Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2009;35:9-17.
  13. Elbahnasy A.M., Elbendary M.A., Radwan M.A. Elashry O.M., Taha M.R. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in selected patients with ectopic pelvic kidney: a feasible minimally invasive treatment option. J. Endourol. 2011;25(6):985-989.
  14. Olcucuoglu E., Camtosun A., Bicer S., Bayraktar A.M. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in a horseshoe kidney. Turk. J. Urol. 2014;40 (4):240-244.
  15. Soylemez H., Penbegul N., Utangac M.M. et al. Laparoscopy assisted stone surgery can be performed in multiple ways for pelvic ectopic kidneys. Urolithiasis 2016;44(4):345-352.
  16. Глыбочко П.В., Аляев Ю.Г., Рапопорт Л.М., Еникеев М.Е. и соавт. Лапароскопическая пиелолитотомия и ее роль в современной хирургии нефролитиаза. Урология. 2017;4:12-17
  17. Meria P., Milcent S., Desgrandchamps F. et al. Management of pelvic stones larger than 20 mm: laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Urol Int. 2005;75:322-326.
  18. Li S., Liu T.Z., Wang X.H. et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study. J. Endourol. 2014;28(8):946-950.
  19. Lee J.W., Cho S.Y., Jeong C.W. et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with multiple renal stones in various parts of the pelvicaliceal system. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech A. 2014;24(9):634-639.
  20. Tefekli A., Tepeler A., Akman T. et al. The comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of solitary large renal pelvic stones. Urol Res. 2012; 40:549-555.
  21. Bai Y., Tang Y., Deng L., Wang X. et al. Management oflarge renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol. 2017;17(1):75.
  22. Al-Azaby H. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: initial experience. Benha M.J. 2008;25:177-178.
  23. Nouralizadeh A., Simforoosh N., Soltani M.H. et al. Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy for management of staghorn renal calculi. J. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012; 22:61-65.
  24. Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г., Алиев Р.В. Лапароскопическая пластика пиелоуретерального сегмента с симультанной пиелолитотомией. Вестник урологии. 2015;2:3-13
  25. Liu J., Maddox M.M., Thomas R. The role of robotic surgery in the treatment of uroloithiasis. Minerva Urol. Nephrol. 2015;67(4):293-301.
  26. Sinha R., Sharma N. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic management of urolithiasis. J. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1997. p. 95-98.

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML
Жүктеу

© Bionika Media, 2019

Осы сайт cookie-файлдарды пайдаланады

Біздің сайтты пайдалануды жалғастыра отырып, сіз сайттың дұрыс жұмыс істеуін қамтамасыз ететін cookie файлдарын өңдеуге келісім бересіз.< / br>< / br>cookie файлдары туралы< / a>