Experience in clinical application of semirigid miniureterorenoscopes in diagnosis and treatment of urolithiasis


Citar

Texto integral

Resumo

We compared efficacy and safety of clinical application of modern semirigid miniureterorenoscopes (MURS) and standard hard-lens ureterorenoscopes (URS). The results of 335 transurethral endoscopic operations on the ureter have been analysed. Positive results of ureteroliths elimination by lithotripsy and lithoextraction were observed in 100 (77.5%) patients of group 1 (hard-lens URS) and in 175 (94.6%) patients of group 2 (semirigid MURS). Ureteral perforation occurred 3 times more often in group 1 patients than in group 2 (3.1 and 1.08%, respectively). A total number of complications observed in group 1 and 2 in the course of transurethral ureterolithotropsy and lithoextraction reached 6.3 and 1.08%, respectively. Ureterolithotomy was performed in group 2 eight times less frequently than in group 1 patients (2.1 and 17.9%, respectively). Ureteropyeloscopy made by semirigid MURS is a valuable therapeutic and diagnostic aid which raises efficacy of transurethral endoscopic manipulations, significantly lowers traumaticity of the upper urinary tracts and reduces to minimum the number of intra- and postoperative complications.

Bibliografia

  1. Лопаткин Н. А., Мартов А. Г. Перспективы современной рентгенэндоскопической хирургии. В кн.: Международный медицинский конгресс Медицина высоких технологий в XXI веке": Тезисы докладов. Челябинск; 1999. 111- 130.
  2. Мартов А. Г., Гущин Б. Л. Опыт клинического применения минископов в лечении заболеваний мочеточника. В кн.: Пленум правления Российского о-ва урологов. Саратов; 1998. 206-207.
  3. Мартов А. Г., Гущин Б. Л. Снижение риска интра- и послеоперационных осложнений при использовании уретерореноскопов нового поколения. В кн.: Международный медицинский конгресс "Медицина высоких технологий в ХХТ веке": Тезисы докладов. Челябинск; 1999. 84-85.
  4. Abbel-Razak О. М., Bagley D. H. The 6,9 F semirigid ureterosсору in clinical use. Urology 1993; 41: 45.
  5. Conlin M. J., Marberger M., Bagley D. Rigid urethroscopes. In: Smith A. D. et al., eds. Textbook of endourology. St. Louis; 1996. 370-376.
  6. Conlin M. J., Marberger M., Bagley D. Ureteroscopy. Development and instrumentation. Urol. Clin. N. Am. 1997; 24 (1): 25-42.
  7. Drettler S. P., Cho G. Semirigid ureteroscopy: A new genre. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 1989; 141: 1314.
  8. Ferraro R. F., Abraham V. E., Cohen T. D., Preminger G. M. A new generation of semirigid ureteroscopes. J. Endourol. 1999; 13 (1): 35-40.
  9. Hamano S., Nomura K., Kinsui H. et al. Experience with ureteral stone management in 1,082 patients using semirigid ureteroscopes. Urol. Int. 2000; 65 (2): 106-111.
  10. Knispel H. H., Klan R., Heicappell R., Miller K. Pneumatic lithotripsy applied through deflected working channel of miniureteroscope: results in 143 patients. J. Endourol. 1998; 12 (6): 513-525.
  11. Lyon E. S., Banno J. J., Schoenberg H. W. Transurethral ureteroscopy in men using juvenile cystoscopy equipment. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 1979; 122: 152.
  12. Marshall V. F. Fiberoptics in urology. Ibid. 1964; 91: 110.
  13. Perez-Castro E., Martinez-Pineiro J. A. Transurethral ureteroscopy - a current urological procedure. Arch. Esp. Urol. 1980; 33: 445.
  14. Schuster T. G., Hollenbeck B. K., Faerber G., Wolf J. S. Complications of ureteroscopy: analysis of predictive factors. J. Urol. (Baltimore) 2001; 166 (2): 538-540.
  15. Young H. H., McKay R. W. Congenital valval obstruction of the prostatic urethra. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1929; 48: 509.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2003

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies