SUPINE PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTRIPSY
- Autores: Komyakov B.K1, Guliyev B.G1
-
Afiliações:
- Edição: Nº 4 (2012)
- Páginas: 60-64
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/1728-2985/article/view/279540
- ID: 279540
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
Materials and Methods. The report included the results of PNL in 64 patients. In 34 of patients (Group I), the surgery was performed in the prone position, and in 30 patients (Group II) - in semilateral (supine) position. The study included patients with one or more pelvic stones larger than 2.5 cm and requiring only a single percutaneous approach, with a body mass index less than 30 kg/m 2 and the absence of contraindications to the PNL in the prone position. Average size of stones was 3.2 cm in Group I, and 3.0 cm in Group II. For the comparative analysis between the two groups, timing of surgery, intra- and postoperative complication rates, extent of blood loss and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Results. Analysis of the results of PNL performed in prone and supine position of patient showed the absence of statistically significant difference in the effectiveness of the surgery, extent of blood loss, and length of hospital stay between the two groups. Significant difference was observed only in the timing of surgery (Group I, 68 min; Group II, 43 min). Conclusion. When performing PNL in patients with uncomplicated nephrolithiasis in prone and supine position of patients on the operating table, significant difference was observed only in the timing of surgery.
Palavras-chave
Texto integral
Bibliografia
- Fernstrom I., Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 1976; 10:257-259.
- Pump B., Talleruphuus U., Christensen N.J. et al. Effects of supine, prone, and lateral positions on cardiovascular and renal variables in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2002; 283: 174-180.
- Gofrit O.N., Shapiro A., Donchin Y. et al. Lateral decubitus position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese or kyphotic patient. J. Endourol. 2002; 16:383-386.
- Manohar T., Jain P., Desai M. Supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: effective approach to high-risk and morbidly obese patients. J. Endourol. 2007; 21:44-49.
- Peces-Barba G., Rodriguez-Nieto M.J., Verbank S. et al. Lower pulmonary diffusing capacity in prone vs supine posture. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004; 96:1937-1942.
- Valdivia G.J., Valle J., Lopez J.A. et al. Technique and complications of percutaneous nephroscopy: experience with 557 patients in supine position. J. Urol. 1998; 160:1975-1978.
- Shoma A.M., Eraky I., El-Kappany H.A. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy in the supine position: Technical aspects and functional outcome compared with the prone technique. Urology 2002; 60: 388-392.
- De Sio M., Autorino R., Quarto G. et al. Modified supine versus proneposition in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trial. Eur. Urol. 2008; 54 (1):196—203.
- Falahatkar S., Moghaddam A.A., Salehi M. et al. Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard technique. J. Endourol. 2008; 22:2513-2517.
- Amon Sesmero J.H., Valle Gonzales N., Conde Redondo C. et al. Comparison between Valdivia position and prone position in percutaneous pyelolithotomy. Actas Urol. Esp. 2008; 32: 424-429.
- Комяков Б.К., Гулиев Б.Г., Алексеев М.Ю. Перкутанная нефролитотрипсия в положении больных на спине. II Эндоурологический съезд. М., 2010. С. 219-220.
- Гулиев Б.Г., Алексеев М.Ю., Лубсанов Б.В. Перкутанная нефролитотрипсия в положении больных на спине. Эндоскопическая хирургия. 2010; 6:36-40.
- Мартов А.Г., Андронов А.С., Ергаков Д.В. и др. Чрескожная нефролитотрипсия на спине. Саратовский научно-практический журнал 2011; 7(2):52-56.
- De la Rosette J., Assimos D., Desai M. et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications and outcomes in 5803 patients. J. Endourol. 2011; 25 (1): 11-17.
- LeRoy A.J., Williams H.J., Bender C.E. et al. Colon perforation following percutaneous nephrostomy and renal calculus removal. Radiology. 1985; 155:83-85.
- Korkes F., Neto A., Lucio J. et al. Management of colon injury after percutaneous renal surgery. J. Endourol. 2009; 23(4): 569-573.
- El-Hahas A.R., Shokeir A.A., El-Assmy A.M. et al. Colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: study of risk factors. Urology. 2006; 67:937-941.
- Lehman T., Bagley D.H. Reverse lithotomy: modified prone position for simultaneous nephroscopic and ureteroscopic procedures in women. Urology. 1988; 32:529-531.
- Scarpa R.M., Cossu F.M., De Lisa A. et al. Severe recurrent ureteral stricture: the combined antegrade and tetrograde approach in the prone split-leg position without X rays. Eur. Urol. 1997; 31:254-256.
- Ibarlusea G., Scoffone C.M., Cracco C.M. et al. Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous antegrade and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int. 2007; 100: 133-136.
- Liu L., Zheng S., Xu Y., Wei Q. Systematic review and metaanalysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in the supine versus prone position. J. Endourol. 2010; 24(12): 1941-1946.
Arquivos suplementares
