The influence of pyelovenous reflux on the development of acute pyelonephritis in an experimental model


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Introduction: currently, endoscopic methods are the main option for surgical treatment of patients with urolithiasis (ICD). The widespread use of these operations has led to the development of a number of specific complications associated with the technology of their implementation. One of the frequent complications is the development of postoperative acute pyelonephritis against the background of intraoperative pyelovenous reflux. The purpose of the study: to study under experimental conditions the severity of pathomorphological changes in the ureter and kidney tissue against the background of pyelovenous reflux in the presence and absence of bacterial flora. Materials and methods: 32 mature female rabbits of the “White Giant” breed were selected as an experimental model. Experimental strain of the E. Coli microorganism 105 KOE/ml. Laboratory animals were divided into 4 groups, 1-3 experimental groups, 4 control group of observation without surgical intervention. In experimental groups, NaCl 0.9% 2.0 ml was injected into the ureteral lumen in group 1, E. Coli 1x105 CFU/ml 1.0 ml in group 2, NaCl 0.9% 1.0 ml + E. Coli 1x105 CFU/ml 1.0 ml in group 3. Results: Results: according to the results of the study, the pathomorphological evaluation of kidney and ureter preparations revealed pronounced inflammatory changes in group 3. Conclusions: pyelovenous reflux does not independently lead to the development of acute pyelonephritis. The combination of reflux and microbial flora leads to inflammatory changes in the wall of the calyx-pelvic system with the development of acute pyelonephritis, which is confirmed by the results of pathomorphological examination of kidney and ureter tissue.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

O. Akhmedov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

postgraduate at the Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

D. Magomedov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

postgraduate at the Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

S. Akhmedov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

student Moscow, Russia

Sh. Sargsyan

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia

resident at the Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

S. Pulbere

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia; N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital № 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: pulpiv@mail.ru
MD, professor, Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

S. Kotov

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University Ministry of Health of Russia; N.I. Pirogov City Clinical Hospital № 1 of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: urokotov@mail.ru
MD, professor, head of Department of Urology and Andrology Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Dogan H.S., Guliyev F., Cetinkaya Y.S., Sofikerim M., Ozden E., Sahin A. Importance of microbiological evaluation in management of infectious complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy.International Urology and Nephrology. 2007;39(3):737-742. doi: 10.1007/s11255-006-9147-9.
  2. Mariappan P., Smith G., Bariol S., Moussa S., Tolley D. Stone and pelvic urine culture and sensitivity are better than bladder urine as predictors of urosepsis following percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective clinical study. The Journal of Urology. 2005;173(5):1610-1614. doi: 10.1097/01. ju.0000154350.7882.
  3. Jung H., Osther P.J.S.Intraluminal pressure profiles during flexible ureterorenoscopy. SpringerPlus, 2015;4(1). doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1114-4.
  4. Grabe M. Controversies in antibiotic prophylaxis in urology.International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2004;23:17-23. Doi: 10.1016/j. ijantimicag.2003.09
  5. Somani B.K., Giusti G., Sun Y., Osther P.J., Frank M., De Sio M., de la Rosette J.Complications associated with ureterorenoscopy (URS) related to treatment of urolithiasis: the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society URS Global study. World Journal of Urology. 2016;35(4):675-681. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1909-0.
  6. Урология. Российские клинические рекомендации. Под редакцией Ю.Г. Аляева, П.В. Глыбочко, Д.Ю. Пушкаря. M., 2018. 477 с
  7. Котов С.В., Пульбере С.А., Алесина Н.В., Бояркин В.С., Гуспанов Р.И., Беломытцев С.В., Котова Д.П. Проблема антибиотикорезистентности микроорганизмов у пациентов с инфекциями мочевыводящих путей. Урология. 2021;1:5- 12. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2021.E5-12
  8. Flores-Mireles A.L., Walker J.N., Caparon M., Hultgren S.J. Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2015;13(5):269-284. Doi: 10.1038/ nrmicro3432.
  9. Dellis A., Kallidonis P., Adamou C., Kostakopoulos N., Kotsiris D., Ntasiotis P., et al. Urolithiasis and Endourology Working Party of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU). The efficacy and safety of string stents after retrograde intrarenal surgery for urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020;72(4):451-463. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.19.03426-X.
  10. Hooijmans C.R., Leenaars M., Ritskes-Hoitinga M. A Gold Standard Publication Checklist to Improve the Quality of Animal Studies, to Fully Integrate the Three Rs, and to Make Systematic Reviews More Feasible. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 2010;38(2): 167-182. doi: 10.1177/026119291003800208
  11. Kilkenny C., Browne W.J., Cuthill I.C., Emerson M., Altman D.G. Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biology. 2010;8(6):e1000412. Doi: 10.1371/ journal.pbio.1000412.
  12. Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and ofthe Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of Animals used for Scientific purposes. OJ L 2010;276:33-79.
  13. European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes (ETS No.123). Appendix A Guidelines for the maintenance and care of animals. Adopted: Strasbourg, 18.03.1986, entry in force: 01.01.1991. URL: https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId= 090000168007a67b
  14. Mahler M, Berard M, Feinstein R, Gallagher A, Illgen-Wilcke B, Pritchett-Corning K. et al. FELASA recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea pig and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units. Lab Anim. 2014;48(3):178-192. doi: 10.1177/0023677213516312.
  15. ГОСТ 33215-2014. Руководство по содержанию и уходу за лабораторными животными. Правила оборудования помещений и организации процедур. Введ. 2017-01-06. М: Стандартинформ, 2016. 20 с
  16. Кролики: породы, разведение, содержание, уход. Ю. Житникова. Феникс 2004. 8 с
  17. Ssimos D., Krambeck A., Miller N.L., Monga M., Murad M.H., Nelson C.P., Matlaga, B.R. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1153-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090.
  18. Ibrahim A., Wollin D., Preminger G., Andonian S. Technique of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2018;32(S1):S-17-S-27. Doi: 10.1089/ end.2018.0047A.
  19. Wollin D., Preminger G., Andonian S. Technique of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2018;32(S1):S-17-S-27. Doi: 10.1089/ end.2018.0047

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2022

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies