Features of encrustation of ureteral stents in patients with calcium oxalate and urinary acid stones


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Introduction. Stent encrustation is one of the most difficult problems that can lead to difficulties in stent removal, while ureteral obstruction can lead to renal failure. Despite the search for various preventive measures, it still remains unresolved.

Aim. To study the effect of Blemaren on stent encrustation in patients with calcium-containing and uric acid stones after ureteroscopy with lithotripsy.

Materials and methods. A total of 60 patients with ureteral stones who underwent ureteroscopy with lithotripsy in A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery from January to August 2022, were included in the study. In all cases ureteral stents 6 Ch were placed at the end of the procedure. Patients with uric acid and calcium oxalate stones (n=48) were randomized into two groups: in the main group (n=20), they were prescribed Blemaren up to the stent removal. In the control group (n=28), patients did not receive additional therapy. To determine the severity of incrustation, we used our own classification, where the percentage of lithogenic deposits relative to the lumen of the stent was calculated. Visual assessment and microscopic examination of the removed stents were performed on days 30±4.1 and 60±7.3.

Results. In patients of both groups, the severity of encrustation on the 30th day after stent placement was low (up to 30%). There were no significant differences between the groups (p=0.421). The main changes were detected 60 days after stent placement. Microscopic study revealed significant differences between two groups. In patients who did not receive Blemaren, microscopic signs of encrustation of the proximal curl of the stent occurred 2.5 times more often than in the main group (p=0.001).

Conclusions.

  1. The number of encrusted stents in patients with calcium oxalate and uric acid stones who did not receive Blemaren significantly increases after two months.
  2. Upper urinary tract drainage with a stent for a period of more than 2 months is possible if clinically necessary, however, preventive measures to reduce the risk of encrustation should be applied.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

A. Pranovich

A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: alex.pr76@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6034-9269

Ph.D. in Biology, Senior Researcher, Department of Short-term Medical Care

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

D. Kalinin

A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery

Email: kalinin@ixv.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6247-9481

Ph.D., Head of Pathological Department

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

N. Sultanova

A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery

Email: naida.sultanova@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2016-8789

Ph.D., Head of Department of Short-term Medical Care

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

Y. Stepanova

A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery

Email: stepanovua@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2348-4963

Ph.D., MD, Prof., Scientific Secretary

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

A. Borukaev

A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery

Email: antik.bor98@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-6626-761X

resident

俄罗斯联邦, Moscow

参考

  1. Zimskind P.D., Fetter T.R., Wilkerson J.L. Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. J Urol. 1967;97(5):840–844. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)63130-6.
  2. LeRoy A.J., Williams H.J. Jr, Segura J.W., Patterson D.E., Benson R.C. Jr. Indwelling ureteral stents: percutaneous management of complications. Radiology. 1986;158(1):219–22. doi: 10.1148/radiology.
  3. Ahallal Y., Khallouk A., El Fassi M.J., Farih M.H. Risk factor analysis and management of ureteral double-j stent complications. Rev Urol. 2010 Spring; 12(2-3):e147–151.
  4. Polat H., Yücel M.Ö., Utangaç M.M., Benlioğlu C., Gök A., Çift A., Kalyenci B., Lök U., Gülaçtı U. Management of Forgotten Ureteral Stents: Relationship Between Indwelling Time and Required Treatment Approaches. Balkan Med J. 2017;34(4):301–307. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2015.1562.
  5. Kartal I.G., Baylan B., Gok A., Sagnak A.L., Karakoyunlu N., Cakici M.C., Kaymak S., Karabacak O.R., Topaloglu H., Ersoy H. The Association of Encrustation and Ureteral Stent Indwelling Time in Urolithiasis and KUB Grading System. Urol J. 2018;15(6):323–328. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4592.
  6. Legrand F., Saussez T., Ruffion A., Celia A., Djouhri F., Musi G., Kalakech S., Desriac I., Roumeguère T. Double Loop Ureteral Stent Encrustation According to Indwelling Time: Results of a European Multicentric Study. J Endourol. 2021;35(1):84–90. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0254.
  7. Kawahara T., Ito H., Terao H., Yoshida M., Matsuzaki J. Ureteral stent encrustation, incrustation, and coloring: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Endourol. 2012 Feb; 26(2): 178–182. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0385.
  8. Gleeson M.J., Glueck J.A., Feldman L., Griffith D.P., Noon G.P. Comparative in vitro encrustation studies of biomaterials in human urine. ASAIO Trans. 1989;35(3):495–498. doi: 10.1097/00002480-198907000-00104.
  9. Mosayyebi A., Manes C., Carugo D., Somani B.K. Advances in Ureteral Stent Design and Materials. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19(5):35. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0779-y.
  10. Tsukanov A.Y., Akhmetov D.S., Blesman A.I., Rogachev E.A. The impact of ureteral stent surface on encrustation and biofilm formation. Urologiia. 2018;2:40–45.
  11. Tunney M.M., Keane P.F., Jones D.S., Gorman S.P. Comparative assessment of ureteral stent biomaterial encrustation. Biomaterials. 1996;17(15):1541–1546. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(96)89780-8.
  12. Shabeena K.S., Bhargava R., Manzoor M.A.P., Mujeeburahiman M. Characteristics of bacterial colonization after indwelling double-J ureteral stents for different time duration. Urol Ann. 2018;10(1):71–75. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_158_17.
  13. Sighinolfi M.C., Sighinolfi G.P., Galli E., Micali S., Ferrari N., Mofferdin A., Bianchi G. Chemical and Mineralogical Analysis of Ureteral Stent Encrustation and Associated Risk Factors. Urology. 2015;86(4):703–706. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.015.
  14. Tomer N., Garden E., Small A., Palese M. Ureteral Stent Encrustation: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Management and Current Technology. J Urol. 2021;205(1):68–77. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001343.
  15. Frolova E.A., Tsarichenko D.G., Saenko V.S., Rapoport L.M., Glybochko P.V. Dissolution of uric acid stones in the ureter. Urologiia. 2022;6:56–60. doi: 10.18565/urology.2022.6.00-00.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
2. Fig.1. Study design (red box: 12 patients with non-urate and calcium oxalate stones were excluded from the study)

下载 (215KB)
3. Fig.2. Microscopic examination of the stent from the control group, removed on the 34th day. Inlay of less than 30% of the lumen of the stent corresponds to a low severity

下载 (51KB)
4. Fig.3. Microscopic examination of the stent from the main group, removed on the 60th day. No inlay

下载 (48KB)
5. Fig.4. Microscopic examination of the stent from the control group, removed on the 62nd day. Inlay more than 60% of the lumen of the stent corresponds to a high degree of severity

下载 (57KB)
##common.cookie##