En bloc resection of the large bladder tumors

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) is not only the main method for staging of bladder cancer, but also the standard of surgical treatment for patients with non-muscle-invasive tumosr. Previously, the generally accepted technique for performing TURBT was electroresection using loop, but the active introduction of laser technologies has made the resection of the entire tumor in a single block (en bloc) widely available. According to some authors, en bloc resection of the bladder tumor allows to overcome some limitations of standard TURBT, including insufficient quality of the specimen containing the muscle layer and implantation of floating tumor cells in the bladder. However, the en bloc resection also has limitations. When using the en bloc resection for tumors larger than 3 cm, successful evacuation of the entire lesion becomes unlikely, therefore, it is usually recommended to use it for smaller tumors.

Publications devoted to the successful en bloc resection for large bladder tumors are included in the literature review. According to most authors, all the advantages of en bloc resection are preserved regardless of the tumor size, such as potentially better local control, lower recurrence rates outside the resection area, and higher quality of specimens for pathological study. A significant limitation of the technique is the inability to evacuate the tumor through the endoscope channel, which requires additional interventions (morcellation, dissection, ablation) or equipment (endoscopic baskets, forceps, etc.). Taking into account the conclusions of the Delphi consensus held in 2020, tumor size should not limit the use of the en bloc resection of the bladder tumor in the routine practice. However, an effective method for evacuating large bladder tumors that suits all specialists has not yet been proposed.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Kamilla Azilgareeva

Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health, FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: Camilla.azilgareeva@yandex.ru

Ph.D. student

俄罗斯联邦, 119991, Moscow, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya st., 2, building 1

Andrey Morozov

Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health, FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: morozov_a_o_1@staff.sechenov.ru

Ph.D., urologist, senior researcher

俄罗斯联邦, 119991, Moscow, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya st., 2, building 1

Mark Taratkin

Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health, FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: taratkin_m_s@staff.sechenov.ru

urologist, researcher

俄罗斯联邦, 119991, Moscow, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya st., 2, building 1

Magomed Gazimiev

Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health, FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Email: gazimiev_m_a@staff.sechenov.ru

Ph.D., MD, Professor

俄罗斯联邦, 119991, Moscow, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya st., 2, building 1

German Krupinov

Institute for Urology and Human Reproductive Health, FGAOU I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: gekrupinov@mail.ru

Ph.D., MD, Professor

俄罗斯联邦, 119991, Moscow, Bolshaya Pirogovskaya st., 2, building 1

参考

  1. Babjuk M., Burger M., Capoun O., Cohen D., Compérat E.M., Dominguez Escrig J.L. et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non–muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (Ta, T1, and Carcinoma in Situ). Eur Urol. 2022;81:75–94.
  2. Clinical guidelines for «Bladder cancer». Russian Society of Clinical Oncology, Russian Society of Urologists, Russian Society of Oncourologists, Association of Oncologists of Russia. 2022. Russian (Клинические рекомендации «Рак мочевого пузыря». Российское общество клинической онкологии, Российское общество урологов, Российское общество онкоурологов, Ассоциация онкологов России. 2022).
  3. Soria F., Marra G., D’Andrea D., Gontero P., Shariat S.F. The rational and benefits of the second look transurethral resection of the bladder for T1 high grade bladder cancer. Vol. 8, Translational Andrology and Urology. AME Publishing Company; 2019. p. 46.
  4. Teoh J.Y.C., MacLennan S., Chan V.W.S., Miki J., Lee H.Y., Chiong E. et al. An International Collaborative Consensus Statement on En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Incorporating Two Systematic Reviews, a Two-round Delphi Survey, and a Consensus Meeting. In: European Urology. 2020.
  5. Kitamura K., Kataoka K., Fujioka H., Kashiwai K. Transurethral resection of a bladder tumor by the use of a polypectomy snare. J Urol. 1980;124(6): 806–07.
  6. Kawada T., Ebihara K., Suzuki T., Imai K., Yamanaka H. A new technique for transurethral resection of bladder tumors: rotational tumor resection using a new arched electrode. J Urol [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2021 Apr 7];157(6):2225–6. Available from: http://www.jurology.com/doi/10.1016/S0022-5347%2801%2964724-4
  7. Das A., Gilling P., Fraundorfer M. Holmium laser resection of bladder tumors (HoLRBT). Tech Urol [Internet]. 1998 Mar 1 [cited 2021 Apr 6];4(1):12–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9568769
  8. Hurle R., Casale P., Lazzeri M., Paciotti M., Saita A., Colombo P. et al. En bloc re-resection of high-risk NMIBC after en bloc resection: results of a multicenter observational study. World J Urol [Internet]. 2020 Mar 21 [cited 2021 Apr 7];38(3):703–8. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00345-019-02805-8
  9. Yuen-Chun Teoh J., Cheng C.H., Tsang C.F., Kai-Man Li J., Kwun-Chung Cheng B., Hoi-Chak Chan W. et al. Transurethral En Bloc Resection Versus Standard Resection of Bladder Tumour: A Randomised, Multicentre, Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol. 2024;
  10. Guven S., Colecchia M., Oltulu P., Bonfante G., Enikeev D., Esen H. et al. How do endoscopic bladder tumor resection techniques affect pathology practice? EAU Section of Uro-Technology (ESUT) and Uropathology (ESUP) survey. World J Urol. 2023;41(10):2617–25.
  11. Yanagisawa T., Mori K., Motlagh R.S., Kawada T., Mostafaei H., Quhal F. et al. En Bloc Resection for Bladder Tumors: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Its Differential Effect on Safety, Recurrence and Histopathology. Journal of Urology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2022;207:754–68.
  12. D’Andrea D., Soria F., Hurle R., Enikeev D., Kotov S., Régnier S. et al. En Bloc Versus Conventional Resection of Primary Bladder Tumor (eBLOC): A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023;6(5):508–15.
  13. Bonfante G., Puliatti S., Sighinolfi M.C., Eissa A., Ciarlariello S., Ferrari R. et al. A survey-based study on the spread of en-bloc resection of bladder tumors among IEA and ESUT members. Vol. 73, Minerva Urology and Nephrology. Edizioni Minerva Medica. 2021. p. 413–16.
  14. Teoh J.Y.C., Mayor N., Li K.M., Lo K.L., Ng C.F., Mostafid H. En-bloc resection of bladder tumour as primary treatment for patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: routine implementation in a multi-centre setting. World J Urol. 2021;39(9):3353–58.
  15. Zhu Y., Jiang X., Zhang J., Chen W., Shi B., Xu Z. Safety and Efficacy of Holmium Laser Resection for Primary Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Versus Transurethral Electroresection: Single-Center Experience. Urology. 2008;72(3):608–12.
  16. Petov V., Timofeeva E., Sukhanov R., Baniel J., Mustafin M., Fajkovic H. et al. Prospective non-randomized comparison of transurethral laser en bloc resection vs. conventional resection of bladder tumors larger than 3 cm. Minerva urology and nephrology [Internet]. 2024 Aug 1 [cited 2024 Dec 16];76(4):436–41.
  17. Teoh J.Y.C., MacLennan S., Chan V.W.S., Miki J., Lee H.Y., Chiong E. et al. An International Collaborative Consensus Statement on En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumour Incorporating Two Systematic Reviews, a Two-round Delphi Survey, and a Consensus Meeting. Eur Urol. 2020;78(4):546–69.
  18. Kirk P.S., Lotan Y., Zargar H., Fairey A.S., Dinney C.P., Mir M.C. et al. Impact of Maximal Transurethral Resection on Pathological Outcomes at Cystectomy in a Large, Multi-institutional Cohort. J Urol. 2023;209(5):882–89.
  19. Enikeev D., Taratkin M., Margulis V., Sorokin N., Severgina L., Paramonova N. et al. Safety and Short-Term Oncological Outcomes of Thulium Fiber Laser en Bloc Resection of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Non-Randomized Phase II Trial. Bl Cancer. 2020;6(2):201–10.
  20. Iscaife A., Ribeiro Filho L.A., Aparecido Pereira M.W., Gallucci F.P., Chade D., Murta C.B. et al. Holmium Laser Resection of Large Bladder Tumors: Technique Description, Feasibility, and Histopathological Quality Analysis. Urology. 2022;165(4):373.
  21. Iscaife A., Socarras M.R., González L.L., Rivas J.G., Pereira M.W.A.P., Leite K.R.M. et al. En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumors (ERBT) using different lasers - Hybrid and Holmium Laser. Int Braz J Urol. 2023;49(6):783–84.
  22. Teoh J.Y.C. Transurethral Modified En Bloc Resection For Large Bladder Tumours. – Full Text View – ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. [cited 2024 May 19]. Available from: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04081246
  23. Geavlete B., Multescu R., Georgescu D., Stanescu F., Jecu M., Geavlete P. Narrow band imaging cystoscopy and bipolar plasma vaporization for large nonmuscle-invasive bladder tumors-results of a prospective, randomized comparison to the standard approach. Urology [Internet]. 2012 Apr [cited 2021 Apr 14];79(4):846–52. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090429511027944
  24. Zhang X.R., Feng C., Zhu W.D., Si J.M., Gu B.J., Guo H. et al. Two micrometer continuous-wave thulium laser treating primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: Is it feasible? A randomized prospective study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33(10):517–23.
  25. Yang D., Xue B., Zang Y., Liu X., Zhu J., Zhou Y. et al. Efficacy and safety of potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization for clinically non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol J. 2014;11(1):1258–63.
  26. Maurice M.J., Vricella G.J., MacLennan G., Buehner P., Ponsky L.E. Endoscopic snare resection of bladder tumors: Evaluation of an alternative technique for bladder tumor resection. J Endourol. 2012;26(6):614–7.
  27. Adam A., Sookram J., Bhattu A.S., Wadee R., Perera M., Lawrentschuk N. Trans-Urethral Snare of Bladder Tumor (TUSnBT) with stone basket retrieval: A novel time-saving technique in the endoscopic management of papillary bladder lesions. Curr Urol. 2018;11(4):189–95.
  28. Hayashida Y., Miyata Y., Matsuo T., Ohba K., Sakai H., Taba M. et al. A pilot study to assess the safety and usefulness of combined transurethral endoscopic mucosal resection and en-bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. BMC Urol [Internet]. 2019 Jun 24 [cited 2021 Apr 14];19(1):56. Available from: https://bmcurol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12894-019-0486-0
  29. Fritsche H.-M., Otto W., Eder F., Hofstädter F., Denzinger S., Chaussy C.G. et al. Water-jet-aided transurethral dissection of urothelial carcinoma: a prospective clinical study. J Endourol [Internet]. 2011 Oct 1 [cited 2021 Apr 7];25(10):1599–603. Available from: http://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/end.2011.0042
  30. Nagele U., Kugler M., Nicklas A., Merseburger A.S., Walcher U., Mikuz G. et al. Waterjet hydrodissection: First experiences and short-term outcomes of a novel approach to bladder tumor resection. World J Urol [Internet]. 2011 Aug 9 [cited 2021 Apr 13];29(4):423–7. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00345-011-0653-8.
  31. Naselli A., Introini C., Germinale F., Spina B., Puppo P. Surgery illustrated - Focus on details en bloc transurethral resection of bladder lesions: A trick to retrieve specimens up to 4.5 cm. BJU Int. 2012;109(6):960–63.
  32. Sureka S.K., Agarwal V., Agnihotri S., Kapoor R., Srivastava A., Mandhani A. Is en-bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor for non-muscle invasive bladder carcinoma better than conventional technique in terms of recurrence and progression?: A prospective study. Indian J Urol. 2014;30(2):144–49.
  33. Hurle R., Lazzeri M., Colombo P., Buffi N., Morenghi E, Peschechera R. et al. «En Bloc» Resection of Nonmuscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Prospective Single-center Study. Urology [Internet]. 2016 Apr 1 [cited 2021 Apr 14];90:126–30. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090429516000182.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2025