On the Issue of the Effectiveness of the Institute of Tax Benefits (in the Context of the Interaction of Legal and Economic Principles)

封面

如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅存取

详细

An assessment of the effectiveness of the current system of tax incentives is necessary from the point of view of optimizing the procedure for preferential taxation, ending the practice of stimulating unpromising areas of activity, providing benefits to certain industries, reorienting towards stimulating energy and resource conservation, greening industry through stimulating scientific, technical and innovative activities. In the context of systematic work to improve the procedure for preferential taxation, an important area of activity is assessing the effectiveness of the provided tax benefits, as well as proper justification for the feasibility of introducing new ones. An important goal that financial management bodies currently face is the study of methodological tools for assessing the effectiveness of tax incentives.

Tasks. Explore methods for assessing the effectiveness of tax incentives and identify problematic aspects of such assessment. In the process of studying the effectiveness of tax incentives, methods of logical and statistical analysis were used. Consider available methodological approaches to assessing the effectiveness of tax and budget incentive measures. Determine the methodology for calculating the effectiveness of tax benefits. Conduct a study of materials on the use of tax incentives in the Russian Federation for the period 2017-2021. Identify problems in assessing the effectiveness of tax incentives associated with the inaccessibility of many statistical data, as well as methodological and methodological problems.

Conclusions. The quality of the analysis of economic processes is determined by the totality of the effectiveness of the data and methods used. The weakness of standard databases and standard methods for assessing the effectiveness of tax incentives lies in the difficulty of identifying each specific benefit. In addition, benefits can be considered ineffective if they are in little demand by taxpayers; we believe that such benefits should be replaced with more effective ones.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Anastasia Archireeva

Kuban State Agrarian University named after I. T. Trubilin

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: Arkhireevaa@inbox.ru
SPIN 代码: 3155-3006
Scopus 作者 ID: 808873

Cand.Sci.(Law), Associate Professor of the Administrative and Financial Law Department

俄罗斯联邦, Krasnodar

参考

  1. Igonina L.L., Mamonova I.V., Suleymanov M.M. Assessing the effectiveness of incentive tax incentives in the regional finance management system // Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast. 2016. No. 6. P. 180-192. doi: 10.15838/esc/2016.6.48.10.
  2. Van Baalen, B. Tobias. Social welf are effects of tax-benefit reform under endogenous participation and unemployment // Research Papers by the Department of Economics. 2005. No. 2005.03. 40 p.
  3. Bargain O., Callan T. Analyzing the effects of tax-benefit reforms on income distribution: a decomposition approach // The Journal of Economic Inequality. 2010. Vol. 8, Issue 1. P. 1–21.
  4. Halla M., Taxes and Benefits: Two Distinct Options to Cheat on the State? / Martin Halla, Friedrich G. Schneider // IZA Discussion Papers. 2008. no. 3536. 35 p.
  5. Klemm A. Causes, Benefits, and Risks of Business Tax Incentives // IMF Working Paper.2009. 09/21. 28 p.
  6. Cardi O., Restout R. Unanticipated vs. Anticipated Tax Reforms in a Two-Sector Open Economy // Working Papers of BETA. 2012. no. 2012-01. 101 p.
  7. Kusakina N.V., Kurdyuk P.M., Ochakovsky V.A. Trends in the development of tax legislation in terms of providing tax benefits to taxpayers // Society and Law. 2019. No. 1 (67). pp. 146-149. EDN:NQMXMV.
  8. Arkhireeva A.S., Edidzhi F.A. Problems of development of financial control // Epomen. 2020. No. 36. pp. 17-24. EDN:YDPOGS.
  9. Yushko A.V., Pichugina S.E., Leviev L.A. Competence of municipalities in the field of taxation // Eurasian Legal Journal. 2022. No. 1 (164). pp. 147-148. EDN:BAAVOV.
  10. Filin M.V., Tseshkovsky A.M. Legal regulation of tax benefits and state measures to combat tax evasion // Taxes. 2009. No. 6.
  11. Sheveleva N.A., Bratko T.D. Tax benefit as a category of financial law // Vestn. economic justice of the Russian Federation. 2014. No. 10.
  12. Gorsky I.V. On tax regulation, tax benefits and functions (historical and methodological aspect) // Economics. Taxes. Right. 2014. No. 3. pp. 17–22.
  13. Kurdyuk P.M., Ochakovsky V.A. On the issue of improving the legal mechanism of tax benefits // In the book: Law and State: Problems of Methodology, Theory and History. Materials of the V All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference. 2016. pp. 36-39. EDN:WKKOFX.
  14. Galuščák, K. Taxes and Benefits: Work Incentive Effects of Policies // Czech Journal of Economics and Finance. 2012. Vol. 62, Issue 1. pp. 27–43.
  15. Dahlby B. Once on the Lips, For ever on the Hips: A Benefit-Cost Analysis of Fiscal Stimulus OECD Countries // C.D. Howe Institute Backgrounder. 2009.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
##common.cookie##