LARC - metody pervogo vybora v profilaktike nezhelatel'noy beremennosti i povtornogo aborta
- Authors: Dikke G.B1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 12 (2013)
- Pages: 8-13
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2073-4034/article/view/282242
- ID: 282242
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
The review presents the results of studies on the most preferred methods of contraception for women after termination of unwanted pregnancies published in the last 5 years, and justification of recommendations based on their evidence. According to most researchers, post-abortion methods of «first choice» are long-acting reversible methods of contraception (LARC), such as implants and intrauterine devices. Their application is recommended immediately after abortion, including medical abortion, that promotes adherence to the method and reduction of number of unwanted pregnancies without increased risk of complications compared with delayed application.
Full Text
References
- Медицинские критерии приемлемости методов контрацепции РФ. Адаптированный документ «Медицинские критерии приемлемости использования методов контрацепции ВОЗ», 4-е изд., 2009. М., 2012. 241 с.
- Основные показатели здоровья матери и ребенка, деятельность службы охраны детства и родовспоможения в Российской Федерации. М., 2011.
- Прилепская В.Н. Руководство по контрацепции. М., 2006.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Guideline Summary. 2011; NGC:008627.
- Blumenthal PD, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: Increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception. Human Reproduction Update 2010;17(1):121 -37.
- Boesen HC, Rorbye C, Norgaard M, Nilas L. Sexual behavior during the first eight weeks after legal termination of pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:1189-92.
- El-Tagy A, Sakr E, Sokal DC, Issa AH. Safety and acceptability of post-abortal IUD insertion and the importance of counseling. Contraception 2003;67(3):229-34.
- Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare -Professional Association. Contraceptive choices for young people. Guideline Summary. 2010;NGC:008192.
- Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare -Professional Association. Postnatal sexual and reproductive health. Guideline Summary. 2009;NGC:007644.
- Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare -Professional Association. Progestogen-only implants. Guideline Summary. 2008;NGC:006465.
- Gallo MF, Lopez LM, Grimes DA, et al. Combination contraceptives: effects on weight. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(1):CD003987 doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD 003987pub2.
- Goodman S, Hendlish SK, Reeves MF, Foster-Rosales A. Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion. Contraception. 2008;78:143-48.
- Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Schulz KF, Stanwood NL. Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16;(6):CD001777.
- Heikinheimo O, Gissler M, Suhonen S. Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion. Contraception 2008;78:149-54.
- Lahteenmaki P, Luukkainen T. Return of ovarian function after abortion. Clin Endocrinol 1978;8:123-32.
- Long-acting reversible contraception the effective and appropriate use of long-acting reversible contraception. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. RCOG, 2013. http://www.nice.org.uk/CG030
- Mestad R, Kenerson J, Peipert J. Reversible Contraception Update: The Importance of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Postgraduate Medicine 2009;121 (4): 18-25.
- Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, Petrosky E, Madden T, et al. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117(5): 1105-13.
- Rose SB, Lawton BA, Brown SA. Uptake and adherence to long-acting reversible contraception post-abortion. Contraception 2010; 82(4):345-53
- Rowan SP, Someshwar J, Murray P. Contraception for primary care providers. Adolescent medicine: state of the art reviews. 2012;23( 1 ):95-110.
- Saav I, Stephansson O, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Early versus Delayed Insertion of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Abortion - A Randomized Controlled Trial. 2012. ClinicalTrials. gov NCT01537562.
- Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. Second edition. World Health Organization, Department of Reproductive Health and Research. 2012.
- Schreiber CA, Sober S, Ratcliffe S, Creinin M. Ovulation resumption after medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. Contraception 2011;84:230-33.
- Sonnenberg FA, Burkman RT, Hagerty CG, Speroff L, Speroff T. Costs and net health effects of contraceptive methods. Contraception 2004;69:447-59.
- Sonfield А. Abortion Clinics and Contraceptive Services: Opportunities and Challenges. Guttmacher Policy Review. 2011;14(2).
- Stanwood NL, Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device after induced or spontaneous abortion: a review of the evidence. BJOG 2001; 108(11): 1168-73.
- Steenland MW, Tepper NK, Curtis KM, Kapp N. Intrauterine contraceptive insertion postabortion: a systematic review. Contraception 2011;84(5):447-64.
- Stoddard, A, McNicholas, C, Peipert JF. Efficacy and Safety of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Drugs 2011;71(8):969-80.
- Thompson KM, Speidel JJ, Saporta V, Waxman NJ, Harper CC. Contraceptive policies affect postabortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception. Contraception. 2011 ;83(1):41-7.
- Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;84:397-404.
- Varney SJ, Guest JF. Relative cost effectiveness of Depo-Provera, Implanon, and Mirena in reversible long-term hormonal contraception in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22:1141-51.
- World Health Organization. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (4th ed.). Geneva: Reproductive Health and Research, WHO; 2010.
Supplementary files
