Neurophysiological parameters of segmental and suprasegmental conduction in patients with various timing of spinal cord injury


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the neurophysiological parameters of segmental (according to electroneuromyography, ENMG) and suprasegmental (according to transcranial magnetic stimulation, TCMS) motor conduction in patients with different timing of spinal cord injuries. Two groups of patients with spinal cord injuries were examined: group 1 - with the duration of the disease less than 1 year (n=50), group 2 - patients with the disease duration 1-2 years (n=48). The stimulation ENMG method was used to evaluate the parameters of conduction to the posterior tibial nerves; the TCMS method was used to the evaluation of the parameters of corticospinal conduction to the muscles of the lower extremities. Patients with positive dynamics in neurological and functional statuses showed a decrease in velocity parameters according to ENMG data, especially in terms of F-wave parameters, and in a relatively short duration of the disease (up to 1 year), and also had the best parameters of corticospinal conduction according to TKMS at baseline. Dynamic observation in patients with positive dynamics reveals signs of resorption of axons inhibiting the regeneration at the site of damage to myelin residues - an increase in the latencies of cortical evoked motor responses and the central motor conduction time. It was concluded that the data of neurophysiological examination of patients with spinal cord injuries, especially with short duration of the disease (up to 1 year), allows to predict the results of rehabilitation measures to a certain extent.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. A Kovrazhkina

SRI of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke FSBEI HE “Russian National Scientific Medical University n.a. N.I. Pirogov" of RMH

Email: elekov2@yandex.ru
Senior Scientist at the SRI of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke

References

  1. Борщенко И.А., Басков А.В., Коршунов А.Г., Сатанова Ф.С. Некоторые аспекты патофизиологии травматического повреждения и регенерации спинного мозга. Вопросы нейрохирургии. 2000;2:28-31.
  2. Broude E., McAtee M., Kelley M., Bregman B. c-Jun expression in adult rat dorsal root ganglion neurons: differential response after central or peripheral axonotomy. Exp. Neurol. 1997;148:367-77.
  3. Иванова Г.Е., Крылов В.В., Цикунов М.Б. и др. Реабилитация больных с травматической болезнью спинного мозга. М., 2010.
  4. Крылов В.В., Гринь А.А. Травма позвоночника и спинного мозга. М., 2014. 420 с.
  5. Никитин С.С., Куренков А.Л. Магнитная стимуляция в диагностике и лечении болезней нервной системы. М., 2003. 378 с.
  6. Cheliout-Heraut F., Loubert G., Masri-Zada T., Aubrun F., Pasteyer J. Evaluation of early motor and sensory evoked potentials in cervical spinal cord injury. Neurophysiol. Clin. 1998; 28(1):39-55.
  7. Davey N.J., Smith H.C., Savi G., Maskill D.W., Ellaway P.H., Frankel H.L. Comparison of input-output patterns in the corticospinal system of normal subjects and incomplete spinal cord injured patients. Exp. Brain Res. 1999;127(4):382-90.
  8. Котельников Г.П., Богданова Л.П. Изменения нервно-мышечного аппарата больных с травматической болезнью спинного мозга при использовании биологической обратной связи. Хирургия позвоночника 2005;1:21-4.
  9. Ковражкина Е.А., Стаховская Л.В., Разинская О.Д. Динамика нейрофизиологических показателей сегментарного инадсегментар ного моторного проведения у пациентов с миелопатиями и церебральным инсультом. Consilium medicum. 2016;2:118-24.
  10. Ковражкина Е.А., Стаховская Л.В., Разинская О.Д. Аксональная дегенерация и вторичная демиелинизация в центральной и периферической нервной системе. Consilium medicum. 2016;18(9):87-91.
  11. Filbin M. Myelin-associated inhibitors of axonal regeneration in the adult mammalian CNS. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2003;4:703-13.
  12. McKerracher L., Rosen K.M. MAG, myelin and overcoming growth inhibition in the CNS. Front MolNeurosci. 2015;8:51.
  13. Schwab M., Bartholdi D. Degeneration and regeneration axons in the lesioned spinal cord. Physiol. Rev. 1996;76:319-70.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2017 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies