DENOSUMAB IN TREATMENT OF BONE METASTASES FROM SOLID TUMORS


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Denosumab is the first osteomodifier of the new class - RANK ligand blocker; the mechanism of action of this class differs from bisphosphonates, and according to the results of clinical studies their effectiveness in bone metastases exceeds bisphosphonates. Objective: clinical evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of the use of denosumab. Цель исследования: клиническая оценка эффективности и безопасности применения деносумаба. Methods. The data of 28 patients with bone metastases from solid tumors treated with denosumab were analyzed. The drug was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 120 mg once every 28 days. As the 1st line therapy, 6 (21.5%) patients received denosumab (21.5%); 22 (78.5%) patients were pretreated with bisphosphonates and had bisphosphonate resistance; 7 (24.9%) patients received radiation therapy and/or treatment with radioactive isotopes before the initiation of therapy with denosumab. Time to the first bone event (pathological fracture, radiation therapy for bone for any reasons, surgical intervention for bone metastases, spinal cord compression, hypercalcemia), the incidence of bone events, the dynamics of pain syndrome (according to the MS scale) were assessed. Results. The duration of therapy with denosumab was 3 to 24 months, the median was 16.8±2.3 months, the time to the first bone event against the background of therapy with denosumab was 8 to 18 months, the median was not achieved. Bone events were observed in 7 (25%) patients: pathological fracture in 2 (7.1%), surgical intervention in 1 (3.6%), spinal cord compression in 2 (7.1%), hypercalcemia - in 2 (7.1%) patients. The pain syndrome decreased by 50% at 6th month of therapy, and by by 77% at 12th month of therapy. Conclusion. Thus, denosumab showed high efficacy without clinically significant manifestations of toxicity in long-term use in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

L. Yu Vladimirova

Russian Scientific Research Oncological Institute

Email: vlu@aaanet.ru
MD, Prof., Head of the Department of Drug Treatment of Tumors Rostov-on-Don, Russia

N. A Abramova

Russian Scientific Research Oncological Institute

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

A. A Lyanova

Russian Scientific Research Oncological Institute

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

A. E Storozhakova

Russian Scientific Research Oncological Institute

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

I. L Popova

Russian Scientific Research Oncological Institute

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

N. M Tikhanovskaya

Russian Scientific Research Oncological Institute

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

K. A Novoselova

Russian Scientific Research Oncological Institute

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

L. A Ryadinskaya

Russian Scientific Research Oncological Institute

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

M. O Ezhova

Russian Scientific Research Oncological Institute

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

E. A Dzhenkova

Russian Scientific Research Oncological Institute

Rostov-on-Don, Russia

References

  1. Coleman R.E. Skeletal complications of malignancy Cancer. 1997;80(Suppl. 8):1588-94.
  2. Lipton A., Theriault R.L., Hortobagyi G.N., et al. Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast cancer and osteolytic bone metastases: long-term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer. 2000;88:1082-90.
  3. Saad F., Gleason D.M., Murray R., et al. Zoledronic acid is well tolerated for up to 24 months and significantly reduces skeletal complications in patients with advanced prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Am. Urol. Assoc. 2003;Abstract 1472.
  4. Tchekmedyian S., Rosen L.S., Gordon D., et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in reducing skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. Proc. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. 2003;Abstract 2532.
  5. Berenson J.R., Lichtenstein A., Porter L., et al. Long-term pamidronate treatment of advanced multiple myeloma patients reduces skeletal events. Myeloma Aredia Study Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999; 16:593-602.
  6. Владимирова Л.Ю., Абрамова H.A., Сторожакова А.ЭM, Палий А.Л. Резорба в лечении костных метастазов рака молочной железы. Фарматека. 2010; 17:97-100.
  7. Roodman D. Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350:1655-64.
  8. Coleman R.E. Potential use of bisphosphonates in the prevention of metastasis in early-stage breast cancer. Clin. Breast Cancer. 2007;7(1):29-35.
  9. Boissier S., Ferrers M., Peyruchaud O., et al. Bisphosphonates inhibit breast and prostate carcinoma cell invasion an early event in the formation of bone metastase. Cancer Res. 2000;60: 2949-54.
  10. Harvey M.A., von Reyn Cream L. Biology of bone Metastases: Causes and Consequences. J. Clin. Breast Cancer. 2007;7(l):7-13.
  11. Senartne S.G., Pirianov G., Mansi J.L., et al. Bisphosphonates induce apoptosis in human breast cancer cell lines. Br. J. Cancer. 2000;82:1459-68.
  12. Bekker J., Holloway D.L., Rasmussen A.S., et al. A Single-Dose Placebo-Controlled Study of AMG 162, a Fully Human Monoclonal Antibody to RANKL, in Postmenopausal Women. J. Bone Min. Res. 2004;19:1059-66.
  13. Elliott R., Kostenuik P., Chen C., et al. Denosumab is a selective inhibitor of human receptor activator of NF-Kb ligand (RANKL) that blocks osteoclast formation and function. Osteoporos. Int. 2007;18:S54. Abstract P149.
  14. Coleman R., Body J.J., Aapro M., et al., Group E.G.W. Bone health in cancer patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann. Oncol. 2014;25(Suppl. 3):iii124-37.
  15. Seeman E., Delmas PD. Bone quality the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354(21):2250-61.
  16. Baron R., Ferrari S., Russell R.G. Denosumab and bisphosphonates: different mechanisms of action and effects.Bone. 2011;48(4):677-92.
  17. Lipton A., Fizazi K., Stopeck A.T., et al. Effect of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in preventing skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases by baseline characteristics. Eur. J. Cancer. 2016;53:75-83.
  18. Henry D., Vadhan-Raj S., Hirsh V., et al. Delaying skeletal-related events in a randomized phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancer: an analysis of data from patients with solid tumors. Support. Care Cancer. 2014;22:679- 87.
  19. Martin M., Bell R., Bourgeois H., et al. Bone-related complications and quality of life in advanced breast cancer: results from a randomized phase III trial of denosumab versus zoledronic acid. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;8:4841-49.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies