Bezopasnost' i effektivnost' skhem terapii gepatita S na osnove simeprevira i ispol'zovanie vo vremya lecheniya soputstvuyushchikh lekarstvennykh preparatov


Дәйексөз келтіру

Толық мәтін

Ашық рұқсат Ашық рұқсат
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат берілді
Рұқсат жабық Рұқсат ақылы немесе тек жазылушылар үшін

Аннотация

Background. The use of pegylated interferon (P) containing regimens for chronic hepatitis C (HCV) virus infection has significantly diminished in recent years, although it still remains an important treatment option in some regions. Simeprevir (SMV) is a direct acting antiviral (DAA) approved for HCV treatment in multiple countries. This study aimed to compare both the efficacy of interferon-containing and interferon-free SMV-containing regimens and to analyse changes in the use of concomitant medication during therapy with SMV. Methods. This post-hoc analysis pooled data from 11 SMV Phase 2/3 prospective interventional studies and one US observational study. Patients evaluated were between 18 and 70 years old and had received 150 mg SMV once-daily for a planned duration of at least eight weeks. The primary outcome was a sustained virologic response at week 12 post-treatment (SVR12) comparing SMV+PR versus SMV+DAA±R. Results. Of 2439 patients, almost one third were female, the majority were white, HCV treatment naive and >20% had cirrhosis. In the Intent-To-Treat analysis, SVR12 was higher for patients receiving SMV+DAA±R (706/811 [87%]) vs. SMV+PR (1096/1544 [71%]). In the subgroup of former people who inject drugs (PWID) on opioid substitution therapy (OST), response rates were similar (SMV+DAA±R: 84%; SMV+PR: 70%). Low rates of discontinuation were observed, with only few patients discontinuing their therapy prematurely (0-15% across subgroups).Adverse events were reported in >90% of patients in the SMV+PR group and approximately 60% of the patients receiving SMV+DAA±R. Use of concomitant medication was generally high at baseline, with a rate of 87% in patients receiving SMV+DAA±R. Among patients receiving SMV+PR, the number of patients with concomitant medications increased from 71% to 87% during SMV treatment (OSTsubgroup: increased from 67% to 89%). Conclusion. Simeprevir-based therapy was well tolerated and effective in patients with chronic HCV infection, with or without PR, and feasible in patients with a high level of polypharmacy. Efficacy and tolerability in former PWID patients were similar to the general HCV population.

Толық мәтін

Рұқсат жабық

Авторлар туралы

J. Dillon

School of Medicine, University of Dundee

Email: j.f.dillon@dundee.ac.uk

S. Mauss

Center for HIV and Hepatogastroenterology

C. Nalpas

Janssen Pharmaceuticals

C. Bicer

BICER Consulting & Research

R. Kalmeijer

Janssen Research & Development

I. Lonjon-Domanec

Janssen Pharmaceuticals

W. Jessner

Janssen Pharmaceutica NV

M. Beumont

Janssen Research & Development

M. Schlag

Janssen-Cilag Pharma GmbH

Әдебиет тізімі

  1. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2016 [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Mar 10]. Available from: http:// www.easl.eu/research/our-contributions/ clinical-practice-guidelines/detail/easl-recommendations-on-treatment-of-hepatitis-c-2016.
  2. Talal A.H., LaFleur J., Hoop R., et al. Absolute and relative contraindications to pegylated-interferon or ribavirin in the US general patient population with chronic hepatitis C: results from a US database of over 45 000 HCV-infected, evaluated patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;37(4):473-81.
  3. Manns M., Marcellin P., Poordad F., et al. Simeprevir with pegylated interferon alfa 2a or 2b plus ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection (QUEST-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2014;384(9941):414-26.
  4. Forns X., Lawitz E., Zeuzem S., et al. Simeprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin leads to high rates of SVR in patients with HCV genotype 1 who relapsed after previous therapy: a phase 3 trial. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(7):1669-79.eS.
  5. Moreno C., Hezode C., Marcellin P., et al. Efficacy and safety of simeprevir with PegIFN/ribavirin in naïve or experienced patients infected with chronic HCV genotype 4. J Hepatol. 2015;62(5):1047-55.
  6. Janssen-Cilag International NV. Olysio -Summary of Product Characteristics. Eur Med Agency [Internet]. 2017 Mar [cited 2016 Oct 27]; Available from: http://www.ema.europa. eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_ Product_In formation/human/002777/ WC500167867.pdf
  7. Yoo E.R., Perumpail R.B., Cholankeril G., et al. Expanding Treatment Access for Chronic Hepatitis C with Task-shifting in the Era of Direct-acting Antivirals. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2017;5(2):1S0-SS.
  8. European Medicines Agency - Pegasys Product Information [Internet]. [cited 2018 Feb 6]. Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/medicines/human/ medicines/000S95/human_med_000974. jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124
  9. Jacobson I.M., Dore G.J., Foster G.R., et al. Simeprevir with pegylated interferon alfa 2a plus ribavirin in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection (QUEST-1): a phase S, randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled trial. Lancet. 2014;S84(9941): 40S-1S.
  10. Dieterich D., Rockstroh J.K., Orkin C., et al. Simeprevir (TMC4S5) with pegylated interferon/ ribavirin in patients coinfected with HCV genotype 1 and HIV-1: a phase S study. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2014;59(11): 1579-87.
  11. Asselah T., Moreno C., Sarrazin C., et al. Efficacy of a 12-Week Simeprevir Plus Peginterferon/ Ribavirin (PR) Regimen in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Genotype 4 (GT4) Infection and Mild-To-Moderate Fibrosis Displaying Early On-Treatment Virologic Response. PloS One. 2017;12(1):e016871S.
  12. Reddy K.R., Zeuzem S., Zoulim F., et al. Simeprevir versus telaprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin in previous null or partial responders with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection (ATTAIN): a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority phase S trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(1): 27-S5.
  13. Kwo P., Gitlin N., Nahass R., et al. Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir (12 and 8 weeks) in hepatitis C virus genotype 1-infected patients without cirrhosis: OPTIMIST-1, a phase S, randomized study. Hepatology. 2016;64(2): S70-80.
  14. Lawitz E., Matusow G., DeJesus E., et al. Simeprevir plus sofosbuvir in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection and cirrhosis: A phase S study (OPTIMIST-2). Hepatology. 2016;64(2): S60-69.
  15. Alam I., Brown K., Donovan C., et al. Real-World Effectiveness of Simeprevir-containing Regimens Among Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus: The SONET Study. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017;4(1):ofw258.
  16. Lawitz E., Poordad F., Gutierrez J.A., et al. Simeprevir, daclatasvir and sofosbuvir for hepatitis C virus-infected patients with decompensated liver disease. J Viral Hepat. 2017;24(4):287-94.
  17. Hezode C., Almasio P., Bourgeois S., et al. Efficacy and tolerability of simeprevir and daclatasvir for 12 or 24 weeks in HCV genotype 1b-infected treatment-naive patients with advanced fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis. In: European Association of the Liver (EASL) [Internet]. Barcelona, Spain; 2016 [cited 2016 Nov S0]. p. SAT-1S0. Available from: http:// livertree.easl.eu/easl/2016/international.liver. congress/125986/christophe.hezode.efficacy. and.tolerability.of.simeprevir.and.daclatasvir.for. html?f=mS

Қосымша файлдар

Қосымша файлдар
Әрекет
1. JATS XML

© Bionika Media, 2018