SEROLOGICAL METHODS FOR THE DIAGNOSTICS OF CHLAMIDIAL PROSTATITIS
- Authors: Molochkov V.A1, Molochkova Y.V1, Antonova E.V2, Skirda T.A3
-
Affiliations:
- MRSRCI n.a. M.F. Vladimirsky
- Shchelkovo Dermatovenerologic Dispensary
- G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology
- Issue: No 4S (2018)
- Pages: 43-47
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2073-4034/article/view/296558
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18565/pharmateca.2018.s5.43-47
- ID: 296558
Cite item
Abstract
Background. The diagnosis of chronic urogenital chlamydiosis (UGC) is complex due to its asymptomatic course, as well as the high frequency of false-negative results of molecular-biological tests, including in consequence of inaccessible localization of the pathogen in ascending infection. For this reason, after receiving negative results the doctor should not regard them as an absolute indicator of the absence of chlamydial infection and consider the potentials of indirect serological tests. Objective. Evaluation of the use of a serological test complex for the detection of antichlamydial antibodies in patients with chronic prostatitis. Methods. During the period from 2015 to 2018, 39 patients with chronic prostatitis were examined in the Shchelkovo Dermatovenerologic Dispensary (Moscow region). For the purpose of diagnosis, clinical instrumental molecular-biological and serological tests were conducted. Results. Of the 39 patients examined, chlamydial infection was not detected by PCR and ELISA in 13 (33.3%), in 26 (66.7%) patients it was detected by PCR or serologically, of which in 6 (23.1%) patients C. trachomatis was detected by the PCR method, in 20 (76.9%) - by serological method. Conclusion. The data obtained allow to conclude that it is necessary to supplement the standard diagnostic methods by determining secretory IgA to C. trachomatis of seminal plasma and serum IgG antibodies to the HSP-60, as elevated levels of the latter indicate a persistent chlamydial infection.
Full Text
About the authors
V. A Molochkov
MRSRCI n.a. M.F. Vladimirsky
Email: vlmolochkov@yandex.ru
MD, Prof., Head of the Department of Dermatovenereology and Dermatooncology
Yu. V Molochkova
MRSRCI n.a. M.F. VladimirskyDepartment of Dermatovenereology and Dermatooncology
E. V Antonova
Shchelkovo Dermatovenerologic Dispensary
T. A Skirda
G.N. Gabrichevsky Moscow Research Institute for Epidemiology and Microbiology
References
- Hamdad-Daoudi F., Petit J., Eb F. Assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic male partners of infertile couples. J. Med. Microbiol. 2004;53(Pt 10)985-90. DOI: 10.1099/ jmm.0.45641-0.
- Анохин В.А., Хасанова Г.Р. Проблемы и новые направления в диагностике инфекционных заболеваний у детей. Российский педиатрический журнал. 2000;4:32-8.
- Кудрявцева Л.В., Мисюрина О.Ю., Генерозов Э.В. и др. Клиника, диагностика и лечение хламидийной инфекции. М., 2001. 4 с.
- Кубась В.Г., С.В. Рищук, Д.Ф. Костючек и др. К вопросу о диагностике урогенитального хламидиоза. Здравоохранение Северо-Запада Российской Федерации. Проблемы и решения. 2003;1(2):79- 84.
- Weidner W., Floren E., Zimmermann О., et al. Chlamydial antibodies in semen: search for «silent» chlamydial infections in asymptomatic andrological patients. infection. 1996;24(4):309-13.
- Ochsendorf F.R., Ozdemir K., Rabenau H., et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and male infertility: chlamydia-igA antibodies in seminal plasma are C. trachomatis specific and associated with an inflammatory response. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venerol. 1999:12(2):143-52.
- Лобзин Ю.В., Ляшенко Ю.И., Позняк А.Л. Хламидийные инфекции. СПб., 2003. С. 38.
- Михайличенко В.В., Бойцов А.Г., Сельков С.А., и др. TERRA MEDiCA. 2003;1:27-8.
- Fresse A.S., Sueur J.M., Hamdad F. Diagnosis and follow-up of genital chlamydial infection by direct methods and by detection of serum igG, igA and secretory igA. indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2010;28(4):326-31. doi: 10.4103/02550857.71823.
- Молочков В.А., Ильин И.И. Хронический уретрогенный простатит. М.: Медицина-2004. 284 с.
- Eggert-Kruzse W., Neuer A., Clussman C., et al. Seminal antibodies to human 60 kD heat shock protein (HSP 60) in male partners of subfertile couples. Hum. Reprod. 2002;17:726-35.
- Homer P.J., Cain D., McClure M., et al. Association of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis heat-shock protein 60 kD with chronic nongonococcal urethritis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1997;24:653-60. Doi: 10.1093/ clind/24.4.653.
- Redgrove K.A., McLaughlin E.A. The role of the immune response in Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the male genital tract: a double-edged sword. Front. Immunol. 2014;5:534-37. Doi: 10.3389/ fimmu.2014.00534.
- Зур Н.В., Миронов А.Ю. Современные методы лабораторной диагностики урогенитальной хламидийной инфекции. Курский научно-практический вестник «Человек и его здоровье». 2010;2:33-5.
- Метельская В.А., Алешкин В.А., Зверев В.В. и др. Современные методы лабораторной диагностики хламидиозов. Журнал микробиологии. 2008;4:111-17.