The use of the «Anika» rehabilitation glove in stroke: the potentials for the improvement of functional recovery


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Violation of fine motor skills in the hand is one of the most common causes of persistent loss of voluntary motor activity, reduced quality of life, social maladaptation and the inability to self-care in patients with ischemic stroke (IS). Objective. Evaluation of the effectiveness of bilateral use of the “Anika" rehabilitation glove in IS patients. Methods. 42 patients with impaired fine motor skills of the hand after primary right (19) and left (23) middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke (mean age - 60.9 years, disease duration - 6 to 12 months) were randomized into 2 groups: the main group (n=22) and control ones (n=20). The physical rehabilitation program for the main group of patients included 10 training sessions with the “Anika" rehabilitation glove (1 hour once a day for each arm, 2 weeks). The functional status of patients in both groups was assessed before and after the course of rehabilitation treatment using the Frenchay scale, the ARAT test, the “H" subsection of the MAS scale, the Nine-Hole Peg test, the Barthel index, the FIM scale, and Visual Analogue Scale in the presence of pain. Results. According to majority methods for assessing functional status, patients of the main group showed a statistically significant improvement compared to the control group, as well as a significant improvement in independence and activity in daily living. At the same time, the presence and severity of the pain syndrome was a factor that made it difficult and slowed down the recovery of fine motor skills of the hand. Conclusion. The bilateral use of innovative technologies with a biofeedback system in IS patients, in particular the “Anika" rehabilitation glove, improves the efficiency of the recovery process and the quality of life of such patients. When determining the algorithms of rehabilitation measures for IS patients, it is important to consider the presence and severity of pain.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Evgenia V. Ekusheva

Academy of Postgraduate Education, Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies of the FMBA of Russia

Email: ekushevaev@mail.ru
MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Nervous Diseases

A. A Komazov

Academy of Postgraduate Education, Federal Scientific and Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies of the FMBA of Russia

References

  1. Andrew N.E., Thrift A.G., Cadilhac D.A. The prevalence, impact and economic implications of atrial fibrillation in stroke: what progress has been made? Neuroepidemiology. 2013;40(4):227-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000343667.
  2. Staines W.R., Bolton D.A.E., Mcllroy W.E. Sensorimotor control after stroke. In: The behavioral consequences of stroke. Schweizer T.A., Macdonald R.L. (ed.). New York: Springer Science, 2014. P. 37-49.
  3. Hatem S.M., Saussez G., Faille M.D., et al. Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: a multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2016;10:442. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442.
  4. Haas B. Motor Control. In: Human Movement. Everett T., Kell C. (ed.). Edinburgh: Churchill, Livingstone, 2010. P. 47-60.
  5. Прокопенко С.В., Можейко Е.Ю., Алексеевич Г.В. Методы оценки двигательных функций верхней конечности. Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова. 2016;116(7):101-7. Doi: 10.17116/ jnevro201611671101-107.
  6. Hooker J., Libbe D., Park S., Paul J. Fine motor friend. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2011;18(4):372- 77. doi: 10.1310/tsr1804-372.
  7. Wessel M.J., Zimerman M., Hummel F.C. Non-invasive brain stimulation: an interventional tool for enhancing behavioral training after stroke. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2015;9:265. Doi: 10.3389/ fnhum.2015.00265.
  8. Placidi G., Cinque L., Polsinelli M., Spezialetti M. Measurements by a LEAP-based virtual glove for the hand rehabilitation. Sensors (Basel). 2018;18(3):pii: E834. doi: 10.3390/s18030834.
  9. Laver K., Lange B., George S., et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Systematic Review. 2017;11:CD008349. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD008349.pub4.
  10. Shin J.-H., Kim M.-Y., Lee J.-Y, et al. Effects of virtual reality-based rehabilitation on distal upper extremity function and health-related quality of life: a single blinded, randomized controlled trial. J. NeuroEngineering Rehab. 2016;13:17. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0125-x.
  11. Bernocchi P., Mule C., Vanoglio F., et al. Homebased hand rehabilitation with a robotic glove inhemiplegic patients after stroke: a pilot feasibility study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2018;25(2):114-19. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2017.1389021.
  12. Можейко Е.Ю. Восстановление когнитивных нарушений и тонкой моторики после инсульта с использованием компьютерных программ и принципа биологической обратной связи: авторефератдиа. докт. мед. наук. Красноярск, 2014. 48 с.
  13. Екушева Е.В. Сенсомоторная интеграция при поражении центральной нервной системы клинические и патогенетические аспекты: автореферат дисс. докт. мед. наук. М., 2016. 49 c.
  14. Екушева Е.В., Комазов А.А. Нарушение тонкой моторики кисти после латерализованного инсульта: процессы нейропластичности и сен-сомоторной интеграции. Клиническая практика. 2019;10(1):16-22. Doi: 10.17816/ clinpract 10116-22.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies