Acneiform rash - dermatological adverse event in the therapy with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Targeted anticancer agents lead not only to higher treatment efficacy, but also to various specific side effects. EGFR overexpression is often associated with the metastatic cancer phenotype and correlates with poor prognosis. Monoclonal antibodies are used to suppress the EGFR-dependent signaling cascade, and have a good therapeutic effect, but with dermatological adverse event in the form of an acneiform rash (AR) in 90% of cases. Objective. Evaluation of the dynamics of AR development in oncological patients receiving treatment with panitumumab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody in infusion form. Methods. Evaluation of the dynamics of the clinical manifestations of AR was carried out in a group of 15 patients with colorectal cancer undergoing therapy with the inclusion of panitumumab in the form of intravenous infusions once every 2 weeks. The follow-up period was 10 weeks. Assessment of the severity of manifestations was performed using the IGA (Investigator's Global Assessment) index on a 5-point scoring system (0-5) daily for 56 days. Results. Acneiform rush developed after the second panitumumab infusion on average of 17.5±3.8 days of treatment with EGFR inhibitors. The undulating dynamics of the skin reaction depending on the infusions of monoclonal antibodies was revealed. The severity of acneiform rash gradually increased, and the tendency to worsen after infusion on the 3-4th day continued. The severity continued until the 7th day after the infusion; then there was a decrease in the activity of the skin reaction and its resumption after the next session of targeted therapy with a gradual increase in severity after each infusion of monoclonal antibodies. Conclusion. The revealed features of the course of AR depending on the infusion of monoclonal antibodies allows prescribing maintenance therapy for AR in the intermittent mode during the period of the expected exacerbation and canceling it before chemotherapy to reduce the drug load.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. A Shatokhina

Central State Medical Academy of Department for Presidential Affairs of the Russian Federation; Medical Research and Education Center, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: e.a.shatokhina@gmail.com
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Department of Dermatovenerology and Cosmetology

L. S Kruglova

Central State Medical Academy of Department for Presidential Affairs of the Russian Federation

A. S Polonckaia

Central State Medical Academy of Department for Presidential Affairs of the Russian Federation

P. G Nosikova

Central State Medical Academy of Department for Presidential Affairs of the Russian Federation

References

  1. Носов ДА. Ингибиторы рецептора эпидермального фактора роста. Материалы V. Российской онкологической конференции. М., 27-29 ноября 2001 г [Nosov D.A. Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Materials of the V. Russian Oncological Conference. M., November 27-29, 2001. (In Russ.)]. URL: https://rosoncoweb.ru/library/congress/ ru/05/15.php.
  2. Salomon D.S., Brandt R., et al. Epidermal growth factor related peptides and their receptors in human malignancies. Crt Rev Oncol Hematol. 1995;19:183-232. doi: 10.1016/1040-8428(94)00144-1.
  3. Bridges AJ. The rationale and strategy used to develop a series of highly potent, irreversible, inhibitors of the epidermal growth factor receptor family of tyrosine kinases. Curr Med Chem. 1999;6:825-43.
  4. Shawver L.K., Slamon D., Ullrich A. Smart drugs: tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer therapy. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:117-23. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00039-9.
  5. Perez-Soler R., Saltz L. Cutaneous adverse effects with HER1/EGFR-targeted agents: is there a silver lining? J. Clin Oncol. 2005;23(22):5235-46. Doi: 10.1200/ JCO.2005.00.6916.
  6. Joshi S.S., Ortiz S., Witherspoon J.N., et al. Effects of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-induced dermatologic toxicities on quality of life. Cancer 2010;116(16):3916-23. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25090.
  7. Boone S.L., Rademaker A., Liu D., et al. Impact and management of skin toxicity associated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy: surveyresults. Oncology. 2007;72(3-4):152-59. doi: 10.1159/000112795.
  8. Segaert S., Van Cutsem E. Clinical signs, pathophysiology and management of skin toxicity during therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(9):1425-33. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdi279.
  9. Van Cutsem E., Peeters M., Siena S., et al. Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J. Clin Oncol. 2007;25(13):1658-64. doi: 10.1200/JW.2006.08.1620.
  10. Королева И.А., Болотина Л.В., Гладков О.А. и др. Практические рекомендации по лекарственному лечению дерматологических реакций у пациентов, получающих противоопухолевую лекарственную терапию. Злокачественные опухоли: Практические рекомендации RUSSCO #3s2. 2019;9:628-38.
  11. Шатохина Е.А., Круглова Л.С. Акнеподобная сыпь - кожная токсическая реакция на применение ингибиторов EGFR. Опухоли головы и шеи. 2018;8(4):48-55.
  12. Shatokhina E., Kruglova L. Clinical assessment of the effectiveness of treatment for acneiform rash -skin toxicity of EGFR inhibitors. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(Suppl. 1):254-55.
  13. Segaert S., Chiritescu G., Lemmens L., et al. Skin toxicities of targeted therapies. Eur J. Cancer. 2009;45(Suppl. 1):295-308. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(09)70044-9.
  14. Robert C., Soria J.C., Spatz A., et al. Cutaneous side-effects of kinase inhibitors and blocking antibodies. Lancet. Oncol. 2005;6(7):491-500. Doi: 10.1016/ S1470-2045(05)70243-6.
  15. Agero A.L., Dusza S.W., Benvenuto-Andrade C., et al. Dermatologic side effects associated with the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. J. Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55(4):657-70. Doi: 10.1016/j. jaad.2005.10.010.
  16. Burtness B., Anadkat M., Basti S., et al. NCCN Task Force Report: Management of dermatologic and other toxicities associated with EGFR inhibition in patients with cancer. J. Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7(Suppl. 1):22-4. doi: 10.6004/jnccn. 2009.0074.
  17. Флетчер Р., Флетчер С., Вагнер Э. Клиническая эпидемиология. Основы доказательной медицины. М.: Медиа Сфера, 1998. С. 45-46.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies