Effectiveness of a shortened cycle of monoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Monoimmunotherapy (mIT) in the 1st line of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is performed in patients with a high PD-L1 expression (>50%) or with severe concomitant pathology and contraindications to therapy with platinum drugs with an intermediate level of PD-L1 expression (1-49%). Therapy is carried out up to 2 years of disease progression or intolerable toxicity. An important issue is determining the optimal duration of treatment in order to find a balance between effectiveness, toxicity, cost and burden on the health care system. To date, there are no prospective studies with sufficient power devoted to this issue. Objective. Evaluation of long-term indicators of the effectiveness of the cycle of monotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) in the 1st-line therapy shortened for organizational or medical indication in patients with NSCLC. Methods. The analysis included patients with histologically verified inoperable NSCLC who received 1st-line therapy in 2019-2020. ICPI in the 1st line received 25/230 patients (16 men, 9 women; mean age - 65.4 years). PD-L1 level>/=50% was detected in 18 (72%) patients, 1-49% - in 3 (12%), 0% - in 1 (4%), not assessed - in 3 (12%); adenocarcinoma - in 13 (52%), squamous cell carcinoma - in 12 (48%) patients. All patients received therapy with pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 21 days. Results. The mean follow-up period was 13.1 (0.8-26) months. The mean number of injections of immunotherapy (IT, min-max) was 9.5 (1-28). The objective response rate (ORR) in the 1st line was 18 (72%): complete regression - 3 (12%), partial - 8 (32%), stabilization - 7 (28%), not assessed - 7 (28%), 2 (8%) patients died after the 1st injection of IT, 1 (4%) patient was lost for follow-up. Due to the registered progression of the tumor process, treatment was completed in 12 (48%) patients, the mean number of cycles performed was 4.1 (1-16). Before the progression of the disease or until the end of the planned duration, therapy was interrupted by 9 (36%) of 13 patients: six - due to the tightening of the requirements of the epidemiological situation, three - due to refusal to visit medical institutions. The mean follow-up period after the end of treatment was 8.5 (3.0-14.2) months; 6 (67%) patients whose treatment was interrupted not because of disease progression are observed without progression 9.3 (4.0-12,1) months (min-max). PD in 3 (33%) after the mean follow-up period was 9.3 (7.1-13.2) months (min-max). Conclusion. The data obtained indirectly indicate the absence of a tendency towards a decrease in mPFS and mOS in the group of patients with NSCLC who received mIT in the first line of treatment, for whom treatment was discontinued unscheduled, and not continued until 2 years or until the progression of the tumor process recorded.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

E. V Artemieva

Saint Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological)

Email: mukhina_ev@mail.ru
St. Petersburg, Russia

F. V Moiseenko

Saint Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological); N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology; North-Western State Medical University n.a. I.I. Mechnikov

St. Petersburg, Russia

N. M Volkov

Saint Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological)

St. Petersburg, Russia

V. V Egorenkov

Saint Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological)

St. Petersburg, Russia

N. Kh Abduloeva

Saint Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological)

St. Petersburg, Russia

A. A Bogdanov

Saint Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological)

St. Petersburg, Russia

A. S Zhabina

Saint Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological); N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology

St. Petersburg, Russia

N. V Levchenko

Saint Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological)

St. Petersburg, Russia

V. M Moiseenko

Saint Petersburg Clinical Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care (Oncological)

St. Petersburg, Russia

References

  1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. First published: 08 January 2020. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590.
  2. URL: https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/ RUSSCO/2020/2020-02.pdf 3. URL: http://www.oncology.ru/association/
  3. URL: http://www.oncology.ru/association/ clinicalguidelines/2018/rak_legkogo_pr2018.pdf
  4. Zappa C., Mousa S.A. Non-small cell lung cancer: Current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016;5(3):288-300. doi: 10.21037/tlcr.2016.06.07.
  5. Detterbeck F.C., Postmus P.E., Tanoue L.T. The stage classification of lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd edition: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143(5):191- 210. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-2354
  6. Mayor M., Yang N., Sterman D., Jones D.R., Adusumilli P.S. Immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: current concepts and clinical trials. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49(5):1324-33. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv371.
  7. Borghaei H., Paz-Ares L., Horn L., et al. Nivolumab versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl.J Med. 2015;373:1627-39. Doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1507643.
  8. Waterhouse D.M., Garon E.B., Chandler J., et al. Continuous Versus 1-Year Fixed-Duration Nivolumab in Previously Treated Advanced NonSmall-Cell Lung Cancer: CheckMate 153. doi: 10.1200/JC0.20.00131. Published: 2020-1120. Update policy: https://doi.org/10.1200/ CROSSMARK
  9. Borghaei H., Gettinger S., Vokes E.E., et al. Five-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Phase III Trials CheckMate 017 and 057: Nlvolumab Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated Non -Small-Cell Lung Cancer Accepted on November 5, 2020 and published at ascopubs.org/journal/ jco on January 15, 2021. Doi https://doi. org/ 10.1200/JC.
  10. Mino-Kenudson M. Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression by immunohisto-chemistry: could it be predictive and/or prognostic in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Biol. Med. 2016;13:157-70. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2016.0009.
  11. Brahmer J.R., Rodriguez-Abreu D., Robinson A.G., et al. KEYNOTE-024 5-year OS update: First-line pembrolizumab vs platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC and PD-L1 tumour proportion score (TPS)>50%. ESMO 2020;abstract LBA51.
  12. Reck M., Rjdriguez-Abreu D., Robinson A.G., et al. Pembrolizumab versus chemothera-py for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1823-33. Doi: 10.1056/ NEJMoa1606774.
  13. URL: https://recist.eortc.org/recist-1-1-2/
  14. URL: https://www.who.int/ru/director-general/ speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies