Rehabilitation of patients after surgery of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. The effectiveness of different irrigation methods


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. Surgery of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses (PNS) have become part of the routine practice of otorhinolaryngo-logical departments. One of the main points in postoperative management is nasal irrigation (NI), or irrigation-elimination therapY., with different elimination activity. Most often, NI is understood as the use of saline solutions with different osmolarity. Objective. Evaluation of the effectiveness of various modes of irrigation therapy (IT) in patients after elective surgical interventions in the nasal cavity and PNS. Methods. The study included 211 patients who underwent elective surgery at the Otorhinolaryngology Department of the Clinical Medical Center, A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry. All patients underwent IT., the duration of which ranged from 1 to 3 months. Results. The study demonstrated the effectiveness of IT in the postoperative period in patients who underwent surgical interventions in the nasal cavity and PNS. The hypertonic saline had a pronounced anti-congestive effecT., and therefore during the first 7 days after the onset of IT with this solution the indicators of the clinical picture were significantly better. Conclusion. The “ideal" IT regimen involves the use of a gentle irrigation of hypertonic saline for the first 7 days after removing the tampons, and then - intensive irrigation with isotonic saline for 1 month. This treatment regimen is characterized by the absence of side effects in the form of periodic nosebleeds, contributes to the maintenance of optimal subjective hydration of the nasal cavitY., softening and elimination of crusts and allows to achieve rehabilitation after surgical treatment in a shorter time.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. Yu Ovchinnikov

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Moscow, Russia

M. A Edzhe

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: ayam75@mail.ru
Moscow, Russia

E. M Khon

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Moscow, Russia

E. V Marasanova

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Moscow, Russia

References

  1. King D. What role for saline nasal irrigation? Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin. 2019;57:56-9. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2018.000023.
  2. Lee Y.C., Head K., Hopkins С., et al. Schilder. Saline irrigation for chronic rhinosinusitis. Version published: 26 April 2016. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011995.pub2.
  3. Лопатин А.С., Варвянская А.В., Осипова Е.А., Пелишенко Т.Г Ирригационная терапия в ринологии: в поисках оптимального метода. Российская ринология. 2018;26(1):46-53.
  4. Tugrul S., Dogan R., Senturk E., at al. A prospective randomized blinded clinical trial: large-volume nasal irrigation with fluticasone propionate in the early postoperative period following septoplasty. Int. Forum. Allergy Rhinol. 2015;5(7):610-15. doi: 10.1002/alr.21527.
  5. Ситников В. П., Бизунков А. Б., Воронович В. П. Терапевтические возможности назальной ирригации. Проблемы здоровья и экологии. 2010;1(23).
  6. Rudmik L., Soler Z.M., Orlandi R.R., at al. Early postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery: an evidence-based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2011;1(6):417-30. doi: 10.1002/alr.20072.
  7. Fokkens W.J., Lund V.J., Mullol J., at all EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinol. 2012;50( 1):1-12,1-299. doi: 10.4193/Rhino50E2.
  8. Hanifi K., Ugur S., Yilmaz C.S., at ail. The effect of different nasal irrigation solutions following septoplasty and concha radiofrequency: a prospective randomized study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84(2): 185-90. Associacäo Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial. Doi: 10.1016/]. bjorl.2017.01.005.
  9. Kanjanawasee D., Seresirikachorn K., Chitsuthipakorn W., Snidvongs K. Hypertonic Saline Versus Isotonic Saline Nasal Irrigation: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018;32(4):269-79. doi: 10.1177/1945892418773566.
  10. Абдулкеримов Х.Т., Гаращенко Т.И., Кошель В.И. и др. Под ред. С.В. Рязанцева. Национальная медицинская ассоциация оториноларингологов. Принципы этиопатогенетической терапии острых синуситов: методические рекомендации СПб., 2014. 40 с.
  11. Abdullah B., Periasamy C., Ismail R. Nasal Irrigation as Treatment in Sinonasal Symptoms Relief: A Review of lts Efficacy and Clinical Applications. lndian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2019;71(Suppl. 3):1718-26. Doi: 10.1007/ s12070-017-1070-0.
  12. Wang J., Shen L., Huang Z.Q., at al. Efficacy of buffered hypertonic seawater in different phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps after endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized double-blind study. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41(5):102554. Doi: 10.1016/j. amjoto.2020.102554.
  13. Orlandi R.R., Kingdom T.T., Hwang P.H., at al. lnternational Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6(Suppl. 1):22-209. Doi: 10.1002/ alr. 21695.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies