Revisiting the issue of increasing patient satisfaction with the results of cosmetic procedures


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background. To date, there are many patients who remain dissatisfied with the cosmetic results obtained, and therefore the evaluation of the causes of patient dissatisfaction with the results obtained, as well as ways to increase patient satisfaction with cosmetic care, is of particular relevance. Objective. Evaluation of the patient satisfaction with cosmetology care in terms of the dynamics of patients’ self-attitude indicators in the process of providing a comprehensive cosmetology program in comparison with a traditional cosmetology program. Methods. Clinical examination, clinical conversation, V.V. Stolin and S.R. Pantilev self-attitude questionnaire were used. Self-attitude indicators (self-sympathy, self-acceptance) were regarded as markers of patient satisfaction. The change in patient satisfaction with the result of cosmetic care was assessed by the dynamics of self-attitude indicators using mathematical statistics methods (Wilcoxon test, Student’s t-test). Results. The study revealed a problematic self-attitude in 77.1% of patients who were not satisfied with the results of previous cosmetic interventions. The provision of complex (including psychological correction) cosmetological care to these patients contributed to an increase in patient satisfaction with the results of cosmetological interventions, as evidenced by statistically significant differences in self-attitude indicators (as markers of satisfaction) in the main group before and after complex correction, as well as in comparison with the control group, where psychological help was not provided. Conclusion. The use of a comprehensive cosmetology program by a cosmetologist, including cosmetology procedures and psychological correction, allowed to optimize self-attitude and increase patient satisfaction with the results of cosmetology care.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Natalya N. Nikolaeva

Center for Psychological Counseling and Cosmetology “BEAUTY-MEDEXPERT"

Email: 999534@bk.ru
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Master of Psychology, Cosmetologist, Psychologist, Director Irkutsk, Russia

I. O Malova

Irkutsk State Medical University

Department of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology Irkutsk, Russia

References

  1. Бреслав Г.Э. Психокосметология: задачи и проблемы. Экспериментальная и клиническая дерматокосметология. 2010;4:23-25.
  2. Пантилеев С.Р. Самоотношение как эмоционально-оценочная система. М., 1991. 100 с.
  3. Лабунская В.А. Самооценка внешнего облика на различных этапах жизненного пути. Развитие психологии в системе комплексного человекознания. М., 2012. Ч. 1. С. 331-38.
  4. Сац Е.А., Слободчиков И.М. Особенности самосо знания у женщин-клиентов косметологических услуг. Современные проблемы науки и образования. 2015;1:15-63
  5. Сац Е.А. Анализ самооценки клиентов косметологической медицины. Дискуссия. Сборники конференций НИЦ Социосфера. 2012;11:142-45.
  6. Столин В.В., Пантилеев С.Р. Опросник самоотношения. В кн.: Практикум по психодиагностике. Психодиагностические материалы. Под ред. Бодалева А.А., Карлинской И.М., Столина В.В., Пантилеева С.Р М., 1988. С. 123-30.
  7. Dalgard F., Gieler U., Lucia T-A., et al. The psychological burden of skin diseases: a crosssectional multicenter study among dermatological out-patients in 13 European countries. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:984-991. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.530.
  8. Ryu E.J., Jeon H.H. The effects of beauty-related college students' self-efficacy on the academic adjustment and the career maturity Journal of the Korean Society of Design Culture. 2015; 21:307-20.
  9. Николаева Н.Н. Психологические аспекты в практике косметолога. Иркутск, 2018. 220 с.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2022 Bionika Media

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies