A therapist-gynecologist alliance: a complex biologically active supplement with probiotic action for correcting intestinal biocenosis disorders

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

Background: The era of widespread use of antibacterial drugs in clinical practice has led to an increase in the incidence of intestinal microbiome disturbances. However, this problem extends beyond the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) remains a common condition in outpatient obstetrician-gynecologist practice and is associated with a microbial imbalance in the intestinal biocenosis, necessitating interdisciplinary management of this group of patients. It has been established that the incidence of CPPS directly correlates with the incidence of intestinal microbiome disturbances due to an exponential decline in the proportion of butyrate-producing bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract.

Objective: Evaluation of the effectiveness of incorporating a complex probiotic biologically active supplement into the treatment regimen for intestinal microbiome disturbances in patients with CPPS as part of an interdisciplinary approach to outpatient management of patients with CPPS. Materials and methods: An observational case-control study was conducted at the Voronezh State Clinical Polyclinic No. 1, a clinical base of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 2 of the Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko, from 2024 to 2025. The study involved 80 women with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of CPPS. All study participants underwent a study of the composition of the intestinal microbiome using the Colonoflor-16 polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Two study groups were formed: Group 1 (n = 40) – control – patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of CPPS, who underwent complex treatment, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, therapeutic exercises, physiotherapy, biofeedback therapy; Group 2 (n = 40) included patients with a clinically confirmed diagnosis of CPPS. They received an extended treatment regimen, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physiotherapy, exercise therapy and gymnastics, biofeedback therapy, and a combination probiotic. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed on days 14 and 30 from the start of therapy. A sample of women (n = 10) taking probiotic underwent a repeat analysis of their intestinal microbiome. All participants underwent a full range of laboratory and instrumental studies in accordance with the criteria of the European Urological Association (EUA). The list of interventions performed on patients is regulated by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1130n «On approval of the Procedure for the provision of medical care in the profile of «Obstetrics and Gynecology». Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 10.0 (StatSoft); differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results: In the group of patients with CPPS receiving the probiotic, a significant reduction in pain severity, improvement in the emotional component of pain (VAS scale), and an improvement in overall well-being were observed. Furthermore, a repeat assessment of the intestinal microbiome revealed a significant increase in the absolute and relative numbers of butyrate-producing bacteria, resulting in a decrease in the rate of proinflammatory reactions and improved synaptic transmission and muscle contraction due to the catalysis of the butyrate-mediated prostaglandin synthesis pathway.

Conclusion: Expanding the CPPS treatment regimen by correcting the composition of the intestinal microbiome through the administration of a complex probiotic improves clinical (psychological and diagnostic) indicators due to the relatively high rate of growth of butyrate-producing bacteria and a decrease in systemic prostaglandin levels.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Ekaterina S. Dukhanina

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Author for correspondence.
Email: kat-des@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-2995-9563

Obstetrician-Gynecologist, Postgraduate Student, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 2

Russian Federation, Voronezh

Elena V. Enkova

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Email: enkova@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8885-1587

Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Dr. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 2

Russian Federation, Voronezh

Kirill I. Obernikhin

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Email: kirill.obernixin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7385-6211

Obstetrician-Gynecologist

Russian Federation, Voronezh

Valeria V. Enkova

Voronezh State Medical University named after N.N. Burdenko

Email: enkova@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3383-5755

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 2

Russian Federation, Voronezh

Nadezhda N. Patlataya

Russian State University of Education

Email: NNPatlataty@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-2634-419X

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Fundamental Medical Disciplines

Russian Federation, Moscow

Aleksandr A. Sozykin

Russian State Social University

Email: sozykin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9282-2156

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of Department of Histology, Cytology, and Embryology

Russian Federation, Moscow

Vasily G. Bedarev

Rostov State Medical University

Email: bedarevVG@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9232-1869

Junior Researcher

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

Vadim S. Zharov

Rostov State Medical University

Email: V.S.Zharov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0007-8070-5404

Student, Faculty of Pediatrics

Russian Federation, Rostov-on-Don

References

  1. Garcia-Velasco J.A, Budding D., Campe H., et al. The reproductive microbiome – Clinical practice recommendations for fertility specialists. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;41:443–453. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.014
  2. Aragon I.M., Herrera-Imbroda B., Queipo-Ortuno M.I., et al. The Urinary Tract Microbiome in Health and Disease. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;4:128–138. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.11.001
  3. The Integrative HMP (iHMP) Research Network Consortium. The Integrative Human Microbiome Project. Nature. 2020;569:641–648. https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1238-8
  4. Moreno I., Simon C. Deciphering the effect of reproductive tract microbiota on human reproduction. Reprod Med Biol. 2019;18:40–50. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12249
  5. Vitale S.G., Loen L.K., Tjiat N.T. The Role of Genital Tract Microbiome in Fertility: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;23:180. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23010180
  6. Wolf E.A., Rettig H.C., Lupatsii M., et al. Culturomics Approaches Expand the Diagnostic Accuracy for Sexually Transmitted Infections. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:10815. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms221910815
  7. Kumar J., Kumar M., Gupta S., et al. An Improved Methodology to Overcome Key Issues in Human Fecal Metagenomic DNA Extraction. Genom Proteom Bioinform. 2020;14:371–378. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2016.06.002
  8. Dominguez-Bello M.G., Costello E.K., Contreras M., et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2019;107:11971–11975. https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002601107
  9. O’Hanlon D.E., Come R.A., Moench T.R. Vaginal pH measured in vivo: Lactobacilli determine pH and lactic acid concentration. BMC Microbiology. 2020;19:13. https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12866-019-1388-8
  10. Brotman R.M., Bai G., Sakamoto J., et al. Temporal dynamics of the vaginal microbiota. Sci Trans Med. 2021;4:132ra52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3003605
  11. Zheng J., Wittouck S., Salvetti E., et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int J System Evolut Microbiol. 2020;70:2782–2858. https://dx.doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107
  12. Lehtoranta L., Ala-Jaakkola R., Laitila A., et al. Healthy Vaginal Microbiota and Influence of Probiotics Across the Female Life Span. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:819958. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.819958
  13. Stennett C.A., Dyer T.V., He X., et al. A cross-sectional pilot study of birth mode and vaginal microbiota in reproductive-age women. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0228574. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228574
  14. Keag O.E., Norman J.E., Stock S.J. Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Medicine. 2019;15:e1002494. https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002498
  15. Brusselaers N., Shrestha S., van de Wijgert J., et al. Vaginal dysbiosis and the risk of human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;221:9–18.e8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.011

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Bionika Media