Complex therapy for acute rhinosinusitis. How to avoid polypharmacy?


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Background. The problem of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABR) remains relevant in otorhinolaryngology, despite the existing pharmacological possibilities. One of the reasons for the widespread prevalence and increasing incidence is associated with irrational approaches to treatment. In addition to antibiotics, there is an excessive use of drugs of various types or polypharmacy in many cases. In this regard, it remains relevant to study various treatment regimens with the justified inclusion of certain drugs. Objective. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Sinuforte in the treatment of patients with moderate acute rhinosinusitis. Methods. The study included 114 patients (59 women, 55 men) aged 20 to 63 years old (mean age - 41.5±6.2 years) with a diagnosis of moderate ABR, confirmed by clinical and anamnestic data and the results of laboratory and instrumental research methods. Depending on the tactics of treatment, the patients were randomized into two groups. In the main group (MG), the treatment regimen included the use of Sinuforte, 1 dose (1.3 mg) 1 time per day as an intranasal spray for 7 days. In the comparison group (CG), patients used only irrigation of the nasal cavity in combination with decongestants for 7 days. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed on the 3rd and 7th days and was determined by the degree of decrease in subjective and objective symptoms of ABR according to a 10-point system using a visual analogue scale (VAS), mucociliary clearance (saccharin test) and dynamics of the X-ray patterns. Results. According to the results obtained, the severity of subjective sensations of ABR, as well as objective symptoms, presented in points, on the 7th day were significantly lower in the MG. The dynamics of a decrease in the radiological signs of rhinosinusitis and an improvement in mucociliary clearance in the MG were similar, which by the end of the study was expressed in the achievement of statistical significance between the groups according to these indicators (p<0.05). Conclusion. The results of this study confirm the high efficacy and safety of treatment regimen antibiotic+Sinuforte in patients with moderate ABR. This treatment regimen is characterized by the absence of side effects and allows to achieve recovery in a shorter time.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

A. Ovchinnikov

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Moscow, Russia

Maya Edzhe

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Email: ayam75@mail.ru
Cand. Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Moscow, Russia

D. Semiletova

A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry

Department of Otorhinolaryngology Moscow, Russia

Bibliografia

  1. Fokkens W.J., Lund V.J., Hopkins C., et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps. Rhinol. 2020;50;23:1-299. Doi: 10.4193/ Rhin20.600
  2. Овчинников А.Ю., Эдже М.А., Хон Е.М. и др. Острый риносинусит: основные заблуждения и возможности стандартизированной фитотерапии. Медицинский совет. 2016;(6):28-31
  3. Libman H., Brockmeyer D.M., Gold H.S. Should we prescribe antibiotics to this patient with persistent upper respiratory symptoms?: Grand rounds discussion from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. Ann Internal Med. 2017;166(3):201-8. doi: 10.7326/M16-2766.
  4. Passali D., Spinosi M.C., Crisanti A., Bellussi L.M. Momethasone furoate nasal spray: a systematic review. Multidiscip Respir Med. 2016;11:18. doi: 10.1186/s40248-016-0054-3.
  5. Назарочкин Ю.В., Назарочкина О.В. Способы оценки состояния полости носа и околоносовых пазух в консервативном лечении больных риносинуситами препаратами растительного происхождения Лечащий врач. 2019;11:43-7.
  6. Baars E.W., van Zoen E.B., Th.Breitkreuz, et al. The Contribution of Complementary and Alternative Medicine to Reduce Antibiotic Use: A Narrative Review of Health Concepts, Prevention, and Treatment Strategies. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019:5365608. [Published on-line 2019 Feb 3]. doi: 10.1155/2019/5365608.
  7. Казначеева О.Д., Герасименко А.С. Методология поиска новых биологически активных фармакологических веществ с рецепторной активностью. Международный журнал прикладных и фундаментальных исследований. 2016;8-4:522-25.
  8. Jurkiewicz D., Hassmann-Poznanska E., Kazmierczak H. Lyophilized Cyclamen europaeum tuber extract in the treatment of rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Pol. 2016;70(1):1-9. doi: 10.5604/00306657.1195609.
  9. Pietruszewska W., Baranska М., Wielgat J. Place of phytotherapy in the treatment of acute infections of upper respiratory tract and upper gastrointestinal tract. Otolaryngol Pol. 2018;72(4):42-50. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.2833.
  10. Fernández-Campos F., Clares B., Rodríguez-Lagunas M.J., et al. Ex-Vivo and In-Vivo Assessment of Cyclamen europaeum Extract After Nasal Administration. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(9). doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics 11090426.
  11. Evseenko V.A., Kolosova N.P., Gudymo A.S., et al. Intranasal immunization of guinea pig with trivalent influenza antigen adjuvanted by Cyclamen europaeum tubers extract. Arch Virol. 2019;164(1):243-47. doi: 10.1007/s00705- 018-4023-3.
  12. Shafiei M., Abdi-Ali A., Shahcheraghi F., et al. Analysis of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 Biofilm Protein Profile After Exposure to n-Butanolic Cyclamen coum Extract Alone and in Combination with Ciprofloxacin. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2017;182(4):1444-57. doi: 10.1007/s12010- 017-2409-4.
  13. Fokkens W.J., Lund VJ., Hopkins C., et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology 2020;58(Suppl. 29):1-464. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.600.
  14. Fokkens W., et al. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2012. Rhinology 2012;Suppl. 23:1-298
  15. Острый риносинусит: клинические рекомендации. Под ред. А.С. Лопатина Российское общество ринологов. М., 2017. 36 с

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2021

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies