COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE PROLIFERATIVE ACTIVITY OF CELLS OF KERATOACANTHOMA AND SQUAMOUS CELL SKIN CANCER


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Background. The histological differentiation of keratoacanthoma (KA) and squamous cell skin cancer (SCSC) is complex, and the mechanisms of their various biological potential are not well understood. Objective: выявить различия пролиферативной активности клеток кератоакантомы и плоскоклеточного рака кожи на основе сравнительного анализа экспрессии пролиферативноклеточного маркера Ki-67 в кератоакантоме и плоскоклеточном раке кожи. Methods. 44 patients with atypical KA, as well as 20 patients with infiltrative-ulcerative SCSC T1N0M0 were examined. Morphological analysis included histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) examination. Results. A comparative semi-quantitative analysis of a number of histological and cytological signs in 44 cases of atypical KA and 20 cases of SCSC showed that they were poorly informative for carrying out a differential diagnosis. However, these two types of tumors significantly differed in the distribution of the Ki67-labeled nuclei of tumor cells: in the case of KA, it was basal, in the case of SCSC - diffuse and irregular. Conclusion. The features of the distribution of nuclei expressing Ki-67 in KA and SCSC are of great diagnostic value for carrying out a differential diagnosis between these two types of skin tumors.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Zh. Kuntsevich

Moscow Regional Scientific Research Clinical Institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirsky

Email: j_s_k@mail.ru

L. Gurevich

Moscow Regional Scientific Research Clinical Institute n.a. M.F. Vladimirsky

参考

  1. Bruno S., Gorczyca W., Darzynkiewicz Z. Effect of ionic strength in immunocytochemical detection of the proliferation associated nuclear antigens p120, PCNA, and the protein reacting with Ki-67 antibody. Cytometry. 1992;13(5):496-501.
  2. Levers histopathology of the skin. 8th-ed. Ed. D. Elater. Lippincott-Raven. Philadelphia-New-York. 1999.
  3. Leblebici C., Pasaoglu E., Kelten C., et al. Cytokeratin 17 and Ki-67: immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of keratoacanthoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2017;13(4): 2539-2548.
  4. Молочков В.А., Казанцева И.А., Кунцевич Ж.С., Бочкарева Е.В. Керагоакангома. Клиника, диагностика, лечение, трансформация в рак. М., 2006. 176 с.
  5. Петров С.В., Райхлин Н.Т. Общие принципы иммуногистохимической диагностики и классификации опухолей. В. кн.: Руководство по иммуногистохимической диагностике опухолей человека. Под ред. С.В. Петрова, Н.Т. Райхлина. Казань, 2000. С. 39-57.
  6. Scola N., Segert H.M., Stücker M., et al. Ki-67 may be useful in differentiating between keratoacanthoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 201;39(2):216-18. doi: 10.1111/ced.12219.
  7. Watanabe I.C., Magalhäes R.F., de Moraes A.M., et al. Keratoacanthoma and Keratoacanthoma-Like Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Similar Morphology but Different Pathogenesis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94(23):e934. Doi: 10.1097/ MD.0000000000000934.
  8. Basta-Juzbasiæ A., Klenkar S., Jakiæ-Razumoviæ J., et al. Cytokeratin 10 and Ki-67 Nuclear Marker Expression in Keratoacanthoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Acta Dermatovenerol. Croat. 2004;12(4):251-56.
  9. Connolly M., Narayan S., Oxley J., de Berker D. A. Immunohistochemical staining for the differentiation of subungual keratoacanthoma from subungual squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2008;33(5):625-628. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2008.02785.x. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
  10. Кунцевич Ж.В., Гуревич Л.Е. Особенности пролиферативной активности клеток кератоакантомы и плоскоклеточного рака кожи. Сборник статей Межрегиональной научно-практической конференции «Актуальные вопросы дерматовенерологии, дерматоонкологии и косметологии», 23-24мая2018г. М., С. 32-5.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2018
##common.cookie##