What can affect the effectiveness of basal insulin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: analysis of the results of real clinical practice according to the diabetes register


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

Background. For more than 20 years, the Federal Diabetes Register (FDR) has been functioning in Russia. It contains data unique in the number of patients and the time of observation. Currently, the FDR allows for a retrospective assessment of the quality of treatment of patients with different types of hypoglycemic therapy. In our observational program, the following question was studied: in which patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), when and how is insulin therapy with basal insulin analogues initiated in real clinical practice, and what is the effectiveness of this therapy. Objective. Evaluation of the practice of initiating insulin therapy with glargine 100 U/ml followed by transfer to glargine 300 U/ml in DM2 patients, as well as the follow-up results of these patients. Methods. Based on the FDR, a sample of DM2 patients (n=200) with initiated insulin therapy with glargine 100 U/ml after 7 years from the start of treatment was formed. We assessed the parameters of carbohydrate metabolism (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] level and the proportion of patients with HbA1c level <7.0%), body mass index, blood pressure at the moment of the start of therapy, during 7 years of follow-up before the start of insulin therapy and 3 years after start of insulin therapy. Results. Quite low indicators of achieving glycemic control goals were demonstrated, begining from the start of hypoglicemic therapy at the time of diabetes mellitus detection (achievement of HbAc1 level <7.0% in less than 50% of patients), gradual loss of glycemic control after >3 years of follow-up after the start of hypoglicemic therapy (achievement HbAic level <7.0% in less than 35% of patients), and a low proportion of patients with HbAic level <7.0% after initiation of insulin therapy (less than 30.0%). Conclusion. 1) At all stages of treatment for DM2, including start of therapy, addition of the 2nd and 3rd oral antidiabetic drug to the treatment, initiation of insulin therapy, titration of the insulin dose, and clinical inertia impede the achievement of glycemic control goals. 2) Clinical inertia has a significant impact on the effectiveness of drugs (including insulin) in achieving glycemic control goals in real clinical practice.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Nikolay Demidov

Hospital in Moskovsky town of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Email: nicolay13@mail.ru
PhD, Endocrinologist

Maria Balberova

Hospital “Kuznechiki" of the Moscow Healthcare Department

Mikhail Antsiferov

Endocrinological Dispensary of the Moscow Healthcare Department

参考

  1. http://diaregistry.ru/. Данные актуальны на 24.11.2019
  2. Анциферов М.Б., Демидов Н.А., Калашникова М.Ф. Динамика основных эпидемиологических показателей сахарного диабета в Москве (2002-2017). Сахарный диабет - пандемия XXi. Сборник тезисов Viii (XXV) Всероссийского диабетологический конгресс с международным участием. М., 2018
  3. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Викулова О.К. и др. Сахарный диабет в Российской Федерации: распространенность, заболеваемость, смертность, параметры углеводного обмена и структура сахароснижающей терапии по данным Федерального регистра сахарного диабета, статус 2017 г Сахарный диабет. 2018;21(3):144 59. doi: 10.14341/DM9686
  4. Анциферов М.Б. Гликемический контроль у пациентов с сахарным диабетом типа 2 во время инициации инсулинотерапии в реальной клинической практике Российской Федерации: результаты исследования CREDIT. Фарматека. 2009;17:70-2.
  5. Демидов Н.А., Мишра О.А., Сафронова Т.И., Анциферов М.Б. Инициация инсулинотерапии у больных сахарным диабетом 2 типа, по данным Федерального регистра больных сахарным диабетом в Москве. Фарматека. 2018;11(364):60-4. Doi: 10.18565/ pharmateca.2018.11.60-64
  6. Rosskamp R.H., Park G. Long-acting insulin analogs. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(suppl 2):109 13. PMID: 10097910
  7. Heinemann L., Linkeschova R., Rave K., et al. Time-action profile of the long-acting insulin analog insulin glargine (H0E901) in comparison with those of NPH insulin and placebo. Diabetes Care. 2000;235:644-49. Doi: 10.2337/ diacare.23.5.644.
  8. Bolli G.B., Songini M., Trovati M., et al. Lower fasting blood glucose, glucose variability and nocturnal hypoglycaemia with glargine vs NPH basal insulin in subjects with Type 1 diabetes. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases. 2009;19(8):571-79. Doi: 10.1016/j. numecd.2008.05.00.
  9. Pan C.Y., Sinnassamy P., Chung K.D., Kim K.W. Insulin glargine versus NPH insulin therapy in Asian Type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;76(1):111-18. Doi: 10.1016/j. diabres.2006.08.012.
  10. Skyler J.S. Effects of glycemic control on diabetes complications and on the prevention of diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2004;22:162-66. Doi: https://doi. org/10.2337/diaclin.22.4.162.
  11. Milicevic Z., Raz I., Strojek K., et al. HEART2D Study. Hyperglycemia and its effect after acute myocardial infarction on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (HEART2D) study design. J. Diabetes Complications. 2005;19:80-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2004.06.003.
  12. Home PD. & Lagarenne P. Combined randomised controlled trial experience of malignancies in studies using insulin glargine». Diabetologia. 2009;52(12):2499-506. Doi: 10.1007/ s00125-009-1530-5.
  13. Шестакова М.В., Глинкина И.В. Инсулин гларгин не увеличивает риск развития злокачественных новообразований. Реферат по материалам статьи: «Home PD. & Lagarenne P. Combined randomised controlled trial experience of malignancies in studies using insulin glargine. Diabetologia. 2009;52(12):2499-506. Сахарный диабет. 2011;1:88-90.
  14. Глинкина И.В. Инсулин гларгин в лечении сахарного диабета 2 типа: доказательная оценка его клинической и экономической эффективности. Сахарный диабет. 2008;4:60-5.
  15. Becker R.H., Dahmen R., Bergmann K., et al. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 units/mL. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:637-43. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc14-0006.
  16. Riddle M.C., Bolli G.B., Ziemen M., et al., EDITION 1 Study Investigators. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/mL in people with type 2 diabetes using basal and mealtime insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 1). Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2755-62. Doi: 10.2337/ dc14-0991
  17. Yki-Jarvinen H., Bergenstal R., Ziemen M., et al., EDITION 2 Study Investigators. New insulin glargine 300 units/mL versus glargine 100 units/ mL in people with type 2 diabetes using oral agents andbasal insulin: glucose control and hypoglycemia in a 6-month randomized controlled trial (EDITION 2). Diabetes Care. 2014;37:3235-43. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0990
  18. Демидов Н.А., Анциферов М.Б., Московский опыт применения нового аналога инсулина длительного действия. Фарматека 2018;4(357): 28-31
  19. Дедов И.И., Шестакова М.В., Майоров А.Ю. Алгоритмы специализированной медицинской помощи больным сахарным диабетом. 9-й выпуск, 2019. Сахарный диабет. 2019;22(S1). doi: 10.14341/DM221S1

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML

版权所有 © Bionika Media, 2019
##common.cookie##