Improving the health literacy of patients with ckd. Informed choice and collaborative decision making. further patient education when choosing a peritoneal dialysis method

Capa

Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Limited health literacy affects about 25% of patients with chronic kidney disease and may lead to worse clinical outcomes. Based on this, a model of collaborative decision making has been developed, modified and implemented in nephrology, which clearly benefits patients with kidney disease. Chronic kidney disease is a disease with a complex pathophysiology and currently there is limited knowledge among the population about its course and possible complications. Health literacy plays an important role in the treatment and care of patients with kidney disease, as well as in making a collaborative decision on the choice of a method of renal replacement therapy. Limited patient literacy can lead to poor efficiency of health services, non-adherence to medications, worse quality of life and increased mortality. In this review, we will consider the importance of health literacy in patients with chronic kidney disease to improve treatment adherence and further influence collaborative decision making on the choice of peritoneal dialysis as a method of renal replacement therapy.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

Vitaly Berdinsky

Moscow City Scientific and Practical Center for Nephrology and Transplanted Kidney Pathology

Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: olkotenko@yandex.ru

Head of the Nephrology Department No. 4

Rússia, Moscow

Oleg Kotenko

Moscow City Scientific and Practical Center for Nephrology and Transplanted Kidney Pathology; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Email: olkotenko@yandex.ru

Dr.Sci. (Med.), Chief External Expert in Nephrology, Head of the Moscow City Scientific and Practical Center for Nephrology and Transplanted Kidney Pathology

Rússia, Moscow; Moscow

Nadiya Frolova

Moscow City Scientific and Practical Center for Nephrology and Transplanted Kidney Pathology

Email: nadiya.frolova@yandex.ru

Cand.Sci.(Med.), Deputy Chief Physician for Nephrology

Rússia, Moscow

Vladimir Vinogradov

Moscow City Scientific and Practical Center for Nephrology and Transplanted Kidney Pathology; Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management

Email: olkotenko@yandex.ru

Head of the Consultative and Diagnostic Department

Rússia, Moscow; Moscow

Irina Kargalskaya

Moscow City Scientific and Practical Center for Nephrology and Transplanted Kidney Pathology

Email: olkotenko@yandex.ru

Head of the "Telenephrocenter" project, City Clinical Hospital No.52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department. Head of the "Patient-Oriented Telemedicine" Committee under the All-Russian Union of Patients

Rússia, Moscow

Ekaterina Ivanova

Moscow City Scientific and Practical Center for Nephrology and Transplanted Kidney Pathology

Email: olkotenko@yandex.ru

Cand.Sci. (Med.), Nephrologist at the Nephrology Department No. 1

Rússia, Moscow

Ekaterina Dorofeeva

Moscow City Scientific and Practical Center for Nephrology and Transplanted Kidney Pathology; Research Institute for Healthcare Organization and Medical Management

Email: olkotenko@yandex.ru

Nephrologist at the Consultative and Diagnostic Department

Rússia, Moscow; Moscow

Bibliografia

  1. Шилов Е.М., Шилова М.М., Румянцева Е.И. и др. Нефрологическая служба Российской Федерации, 2023. Часть I. Заместительная почечная терапия. [Shilov E.M., Shilova M.M., Rumyantseva E.I. et al. Nephrological Service of the Russian Federation, 2023. Part I. Renal replacement therapy. (In Russ.)].
  2. Csaba P. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease: an update 2022. Kidney Internat. Suppl. 2022;12(1):7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.kisu.2021.11.003.
  3. Combes G., Sein K., Allen K. How does pre-dialysis education need to change? Findings from a qualitative study with staff and patients. BMC. Nephrol 2017;18:334. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-017-0751-y.
  4. Van den Bosch J., Warren D.S., Rutherford P.A. Review of predialysis education programs: a need for standardization. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015;9:1279–91. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S81284
  5. Figueiredo A.E., Bernardini J., Bowes E., et al. A Syllabus for Teaching Peritoneal Dialysis to Patients and Caregivers. Perit. Dial. Int. 2016;36(6):592–605. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2015.00277. [Epub 2016 Feb 25, PMID: 26917664, PMCID: PMC5174866].
  6. Jaelani T.R., Ibrahim K., Jonny J., et al. Peritoneal Dialysis Patient Training Program to Enhance independence and Prevent Complications: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Nephrol. Renovasc. Dis. 2023;16:207–22. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S414447
  7. Dubin R., Rubinsky A. A Digital Modality Decision Program for Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease. JMIR Form. Res. 2019;3(1):e12528. doi: 10.2196/12528. [PMID: 30724735, PMCID: 6381409].
  8. Wavamunno M.D., Harris D.C.H. The need for early nephrology referral. Kidney Int. Suppl. 2005;(94):S128–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.09429.x.
  9. Boyer A., Solis-Trapala I., Tabinor M., et al. Impact of the implementation of an assisted peritoneal dialysis service on peritoneal dialysis initiation. Nephrol. Dial. Transplantat. 2020;35(9):1595–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfz287
  10. Khan S.F. Updates on Infectious and Other Complications in Peritoneal Dialysis: Core Curriculum 2023. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2023;82(4):481–90. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.03.011. [Epub 2023 Jul 12].
  11. Schaepe C., Bergjan M. Educational interventions in peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review of the literature. Int. J. Nurs Stud. 2015;52(4):882–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.12.009.
  12. Kong I.L.L., Irene L.P., Mok G.W.S., et al. Setting Up A Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Training Program. Peritoneal Dialysis. J. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2003;23(Suppl. 2):178–82. doi: 10.1177/089686080302302s37.
  13. Figueiredo A.E., Bernardini J., Bowes E., et al. A Syllabus for Teaching Peritoneal Dialysis to Patients and Caregivers. Perit. Dial. Int. 2016;36(6):592–605. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2015.00277.
  14. Bernardini J., et al. Peritoneal Dialysis Patient Training, 2006. Int. Soc. Perit. Dial. 2006;15(4):243–47.
  15. Figueiredo A.E., Moraes T.P., Bernardini J., et al. Impact of patient training patterns on peritonitis rates in a large national cohort study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2015;30(1):137–42. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu286.
  16. Barone R.J., Campora M.I., Gimenez N.S., et al. The importance of the Patient’s training in chronic peritoneal dialysis and peritonitis. Adv. Perit. Dial. 2011;27:97–100.
  17. Hurst H., Figueiredo A.E. The needs of older patients for peritoneal dialysis: training and support at home. Perit. Dial. Int. 2015;35(6):625–29. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00337.
  18. Molnar A.O., Hiremath S., Brown P.A., Akbari A. Risk factors for unplanned and crash dialysis starts: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC. Nephrol. 2009;10:22.
  19. Chanouzas D., Ng K.P., Fallouh B., Baharani J. What influences patient choice of treatment modality at the pre-dialysis stage? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2012;27:1542–47.
  20. Klang B., Björvell H., Berglund J., et al. Predialysis patient education: effects on functioning and well-being in uraemic patients. J. Adv. Nurs. 1998;28:36–44.
  21. Goovaerts T., Jadoul M., Goffin E. Influence of a pre-dialysis education programme (PDEP) on the mode of renal replacement therapy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2005;20:1842–47.
  22. Agraharkar M., Patlovany M., Henry S., Bonds B. Promoting use of home dialysis. Adv. Perit. Dial. 2003;19:163–67.
  23. Heaf J.G., Lokkegaard H., Madsen M. Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to haemodialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2002;17:112–17.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML
Baixar