Health schools for patients: physicians’ perspective
- Autores: Mamedova E.B1, Batjushin M.M1, Bykovskaja T.J.1
-
Afiliações:
- Edição: Nº 5-6 (2015)
- Páginas: 28-31
- Seção: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2075-3594/article/view/262681
- ID: 262681
Citar
Texto integral
Acesso aberto
Acesso está concedido
Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes
Resumo
Aim: Determine attitude of the medical community towards educational programs for patients. Materials and methods: One hundred physicians (19 males and 81females, mean age 42,4±1,2) were interviewed; of them 50 worked in primary health care and 50 were nephrologists. Results: The findings of the study showed a slice of specialists’ knowledge in nephrology. Analysis of social portraits of nephrologists and primary health care physicians revealed what kind of experts meet with kidney disease patients. The study provided the knowledge of patients’ compliance, the initial level of patients' understanding of their disease, according to doctors. The data showed what causes prevent doctors from taking part in educational projects and arguments that would allow them to engage in this activity. Conclusion: In general, the attitude of the medical community to patients’ educational projects was positive. The majority of experts are ready to take part in health schools for the patients. At the same time, doctors have knowledge gaps in nephrology; some doctors do not follow a healthy lifestyle. One of the main criteria for participation in health schools for the patients is financial incentives, rather than a genuine desire to help the patient in learning to control the course of their disease and acquire knowledge that will enable it to fight the illness.
Palavras-chave
Texto integral
Bibliografia
- Сигитова О.Н., Архипов Е.В. Хроническая болезнь почек: новое в классификации, диагностике, нефропротекции. Вестник современной клинической медицины. 2014; 7(1): 103-106.
- World Health Organization (WHO) / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J. Hypertens. 2003; 21: 1983-1992.
- Явгильдина А.М. Роль образовательных программ для пациентов с хроническими заболеваниями. Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. 2011; 1(6): 110-112.
- Калинина А.М., Бойцов С.А. Эффективное консультирование пациентов с хроническими неинфекционными заболеваниями и факторами риска: основные принципы. Часть I. Профилактическая медицина. 2013; 4: 8-12.
- Конради А.О., Соболева А.В., Максимова Т.А., Полуничева Е.В., Бродская И.С., Шляхто Е.В. Обучение больных гипертонической болезнью - бессмысленная трата времени или реальный инструмент в повышении качества контроля заболевания? Consilium-medicum. Артериальная гипертензия. 2002; 8: 6.
- Смирнов А.В., Шилов Е.М., Добронравов В.А., Каюков И.Г., Бобкова И.Н., Швецов М.Ю., Цыгин А.Н., Шутов А.М. Национальные рекомендации. Хроническая болезнь почек: основные принципы скрининга, диагностики, профилактики и подходы к лечению. Клиническая нефрология. 2012; 4: 2-26.
- Батюшин М.М., Павлова Е.Б. Как жить с болезнью почек? Ростов н/Д.: Феникс, 2014.
- Аметов А.С., Валитов Б.И., Черникова Н.А. Терапевтическое обучение больных: прошлое, настоящее, будущее. Сахарный диабет. 2012; 1: 71-77.
- Кузнецов А.И., Кашина Е.С., Лазарева Л.А., Кичатова Е.Ю., Герасимова О.Н., Мунтян И.А. Школа здоровья для пациентов с сахарным диабетом 2 типа. Известия Самарского научного центра Российской академии наук. 2014; 16(5): 1511-1513.
- Cantillon P., Stewart В., Haeck К., Bills J., Ker J., Rethans J.J. Simulated patient programmes in Europe: collegiality or separate development? Med. Teach. 2010; 32(3): 106-110.
- Pellise F., Sell Р. Patient information and education with modern media: the Spine Society of Europe Patient Line. Eur. Spine. 2009; 18(3): 395-401.
- Van Mook W.N., Gorter S.L., De Grave W.S., van Luijk S.J., O'Sullivan H., Wass V., Zwaveling J.H., Schuwirth L.W., van der Vleuten C.P. Professionalism beyond medical school: an educational continuum? Eur. J. Intern. Med. 2009; 20(8): 148-152.
Arquivos suplementares
