Tools to stimulate open innovation for urban spaces
- Authors: Mukhametov D.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- The Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
- Issue: Vol 13, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 1327-1338
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2222-0372/article/view/608077
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.13.3.119236
- ID: 608077
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription or Fee Access
Abstract
The article aims to analyze the tools to promote open innovation for urban spaces. Open innovation is the process of creating new products and solutions through the involvement of various stakeholders. The main advantage of open innovation is the ability to adapt new solutions and products to the diversity of the social environment. For urban spaces, open innovations can reduce the asymmetry between the proposed technology and the interests of citizens and other agents of urban policy. Tools to promote open innovation for urban spaces are live labs, regulatory sandboxes, govtech accelerators, frameworks for organizational reforms. These tools include such incentives as access to capital or investments, databases, pilot projects and testing environment, expert evaluation, prospects for scaling and commercialization. The article discusses examples of how to use these tools. The article is of interest to researchers of smart cities and digital urban environment.Acknowledgments:The article was prepared based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budgetary funds under the state assignment of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation.
About the authors
Daniyar Rustyamovich Mukhametov
The Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Author for correspondence.
Email: mukhametovdaniyar@gmail.com
References
- Luan X.Y., Wang X.H. Open innovation, enterprise value and the mediating effect of ESG // Business Process Management Journal. – 2023. – № 2. – p. 489-504.
- Di Simone L., Petracci B., Piva M. Economic sustainability, innovation, and the ESG factors: An empirical investigation // Sustainability. – 2022. – № 4. – p. 2270.
- Борисюк Н.К., Смотрина О.С. Развитие потенциала промышленной экосистемы региона // Креативная экономика. – 2023. – № 9.
- Яшин С.Н., Яшина Н.И., Захарова Ю.В., Оранова М.В. Реализация концепции открытых инноваций в регионах на базе платформенного подхода // Креативная экономика. – 2020. – № 11. – c. 2803-2810.
- Удальцова Н.Л. Потенциал модели открытых инноваций и его использование // Экономические науки. – 2020. – № 187. – c. 87-93.
- Huggins R., Prokop D., Thompson P. Universities and open innovation: The determinants of network centrality // The Journal of Technology Transfer. – 2020. – № 3. – p. 718-757.
- Mukhametov D. Exploring the Influence of Government Data Performance on Knowledge Capabilities: Towards a Data-Oriented Political Economy // Social Sciences. – 2022. – № 9. – p. 384.
- Тронина И. А., Татенко Г. И., Бахтина С. С. Открытые инновации как форма реализации концепции инновационного развития территории на принципах «умной специализации» // International Journal. – 2019. – № 12. – c. 51-58.
- Mu R., Wang H. A systematic literature review of open innovation in the public sector: Comparing barriers and governance strategies of digital and non-digital open innovation // Public Management Review. – 2022. – № 4. – p. 489-511.
- Мухаметов Д.Р. Создание устойчивых умных городов: технологии вовлечения граждан и совместного экспериментирования // Вопросы инновационной экономики. – 2022. – № 2. – c. 843-858.
- Brown E., Piroska D. Governing fintech and fintech as governance: The regulatory sandbox, riskwashing, and disruptive social classification // New Political Economy. – 2022. – № 1. – p. 19-32.
- Rizzo A., Habibipour A., Ståhlbröst A. Transformative thinking and urban living labs in planning practice: a critical review and ongoing case studies in Europe // European Planning Studies. – 2021. – № 10. – p. 1739-1757.
- Bharosa N. The rise of GovTech: Trojan horse or blessing in disguise? A research agenda // Government Information Quarterly. – 2022. – № 3. – p. 101692.
- Horgan D., Dimitrijević B. Frameworks for citizens participation in planning: From conversational to smart tools // Sustainable Cities and Society. – 2019. – p. 101550.
- Smith M., Nordby P., Yu M., Jaffery J. A practical model for research with learning health systems: Building and implementing effective complex case management // Applied Ergonomics. – 2020. – p. 103023.
- Mukhametov D.R. How ICT-infrastructure Defines Economic Complexity: Information Policy to Facilitate Innovations // System of Signal Synchronization, Generating and Processing in Telecommunications. – 2022. – № 1. – p. 213-217.
Supplementary files
