SOME ASPECTS OF DETERMINING THE SUBJECTS OF AN AGREEMENT ON THE PAYMENT OF ALIMONY FOR CHILDREN IN THE LEGISLATION OF RUSSIA AND THE USA


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The family as a social institution is going through difficult times. The United Nations indicates that the United States is third in the world in the number of divorces: 4.34 cases per 1000 people, about 40 percent of first marriages and 60 percent of remarriages break up [10;860]. Statistics in Russia are no better. In 2017, according to the Federal State Statistics Service, there were 4.2 divorces per 1000 people, the first half of 2019 was 4.0. It is noted that the number of marriages in Russia is falling. According to state statistics, the number of marriages from 1,049,735 in 2017 decreased to 893,039 in 2018. [9] As the United States Child Support Council (CSEC) has indicated, the growing number of parents deliberately avoiding their responsibilities to their children has become a national problem. Today, more than $ 106 billion in child support remains unpaid. [25]. The strengthening of administrative methods of influence on dishonest payers shows its inefficiency. Contracting regulation of parents by the issue of the maintenance of their children is attracting more and more attention of jurists. The contractual regulation of maintenance obligations has positive aspects, including the speedy resolution of controversial issues, the individualization of regulated obligations, the reduction of the psycho-traumatic effect on the psyche of children, and the saving of expenses on court cases. On the other hand, given the special nature of regulated relations, the need to ensure the protection of children, the conditions and procedure for concluding such agreements should be carefully worked out. The purpose of this study is a comparative study of theoretical and practical problems of identifying the subjects of an agreement on the support of minor children in Russia and the United States to determine effective mechanisms for protecting the interests of minor children in the breakup of the family.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Yulia Artemyeva

Law Institute RUDN University

Email: artemyeva_yua@pruf.ru
PhD in Law, associate professor, associate professor of Civil Law of the Department of Civil and Civil Procedural Law and Private International Law

参考

  1. Алексеева О.Г., Заец Л.В., Звягинцева Л.М. [и др.]. Комментарий к Семейному кодексу Российской Федерации (учебно-практический) (под общ. ред. С.А. Степанова). - М.: «Проспект», Екатеринбург: «Институт частного права», 2015, стр. 229
  2. Артемьева Ю. А., Зимаков А. М., Сергеева В. В. Правовые аспекты применения соглашения об уплате алиментов на несовершеннолетних детей в России. // Социально-политические науки. №5, 2018, с. 188-197.
  3. Артемьева Ю.А. Соглашение об уплате алиментов на несовершеннолетнего ребенка.// Мир экономики и права №12 , 2014с. 70-74
  4. Обзор судебной практики по делам, связанным со взысканием алиментов на несовершеннолетних детей, а также на нетрудоспособных совершеннолетних детей (утв. Президиумом Верховного Суда РФ 13 мая 2015 г.) Бюллетень Верховного Суда Российской Федерации, июль 2015 г., № 7.
  5. Определение СК по гражданским делам Верховного Суда РФ от 25 июня 2013 г. № 4-КГ13-16.
  6. Постановление Пленума Верховного Суда РФ от 26 декабря 2017 г. № 56 «О применении судами законодательства при рассмотрении дел, связанных со взысканием алиментов».// Российская газета от 29 декабря 2017 г. № 297.
  7. Решение Кировского районного суда г. Волгограда от 17 октября 2016г (дело № 2-2962/2016) [Электронный ресурс]. -URL: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/8qprzs50Pl11/. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  8. Семейный кодекс Российской Федерации от 29.12.1995 г. №223-Ф3 в ред. от (ред. от 29.05.2019).// Собрание законодательства Российской Федерации. 1996. № 1. Ст.16.
  9. Статистические данные Федеральной службы государственной статистики.// [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://www.fedstat.ru/ indicator/31268. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  10. Artemyeva Y., Ivanovskaya N., Koncheva V., Sitkarev E. Current Problems of Concluding an Agreement on the Alimony Payment for Minors in Russia Advanced Research in Law and Economics, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 3(33), p. 859-869, june 2018. ISSN 2068-696X.
  11. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. In re Harney. No. 5476-1. 19 Wn. App. 85 (Wash. Ct. App. 1978) 574 P.2d 395 19 Wash. App. 85 Decided Jan 16, 1978 // [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://casetext.com/pdf-downloaded? download_redirect=in-reharney&utm_source=Iterable& utm_medium =email&utm_campaign= prospecting- emails& content= finalday&term= long. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  12. Dudin M.N., Frolova E.E., Protopopova O.V., Artemieva Ju.A., Abashidze A.H. (2016) Latin America And Russia On The Course Of Mutual Contingence Under Conditions Of Global Economic Crisis // International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research. 2016. Т. 14. № 15. С. 11161-11170. ISSN : 0972-7302
  13. Dudin M.N., Ivashchenko N.P., Frolova Е.Е., Abashidze A.H. (2017) Institutional Approach to Establishment of a Structural Model of the Russian Academic Environment Development// European Journal of Contemporary Education. 2017. Т. 6. № 1. С. 22-38. E-ISSN: 2305-6746.
  14. Elizabethan Poor Law of 1601. The Elizabethan Act of 1601 for the Relief of the Poor, 43 Eliz. 1, c. 2, § VI (1601)// [Электронный ресурс].-URL: http://www.victorianweb.org /history/poorlaw/elizpl.html. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  15. Family Code California - FAMС enacted by Stats. 1992, Ch. 162, Sec. 10 // [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_ displayText.xhtml?lawCode=FAM&division=9.&title=&part=1.&chapter=3.&article=1. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  16. Divorce Statistics in the United States and California. 09.10. 2018. [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://www.michaelagardner.net/blog/ 2018/10/09/divorce-statistics-in-the-united-193973. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  17. Jefferson v. Jefferson, 246 La. 1, 163 So.2d 74 (1964).// [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://cite.case.law/so2d/163/. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  18. Goldberger v. Goldberger, 624 A.2d 1328 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1993) No. 1395, September Term, 1992. May 28, 1993. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.
  19. Levy v. Levy, 536 So. 2d 742, 743. 14.12.1988. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit Dec 14, 1988 536. So. 2d 742 (La. Ct. App. 1988).// [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://casetext.com/case/levy-v-levy-79. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  20. North Carolina General Statutes. // [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://codes.findlaw.com/nc/chapter-50a-uniform-child-custody-jurisdiction-and-enforcement-act-and-uniform-deployed-parents-custody-and-visitation-act/#!tid= N1AFB68E 0B05C11E2AB9DFFB0A5D83A53. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  21. Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105. // [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://www.congress.gov /104/plaws/publ193/PLAW-104publ193.pdf. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  22. Savoie v. Savoie, 583 A.2d 762 (NJ Super. Ct. App. Div. 1990) New Jersey Superior Court // [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://www.courtlistener.com /opinion/2076462/savoie-v-savoie/. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  23. Steven Rodney Bennett b/n/f Susan Marie Bennett and Susan Marie Bennett. 194 Ga. App. 197 (1990)ь390 S.E.2d 276 Decided January 9, 1990. Court of Appeals of Georgia.// [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/ georgia/court-of-appeals/1990/a89a2275.html. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  24. Zemmelman M.L. Building a Parenting Agreement That Works: Child Custody Agreements Step by Step. 8th Edition. Nolo. 2014.
  25. GAO Report on Child Support Enforcement July , 2019// [Электронный ресурс].-URL: http://www.csecouncil.org/pdf /gaoreport_childsupport.pdf. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  26. Uniform Interstate Family Support Act Part 1. Article 5-B General Provisions.// [Электронный ресурс]. -URL: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/FCT. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  27. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Administration of Juvenile Justice («The Beijing Rules»). Adopted by General Assembly resolution 40/33 of 29 November 1985.// [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://www.ohchr.org /Documents/ ProfessionalInterest/ beijingrules.pdf. (режим доступа: 29.10.2019).
  28. William Tratner, From Poor Law to Welfare State: A History of Social Welfare in America (4th ed. 1989) (history of English poor laws in the United states). Р.25.
  29. Wilsey v. Wilsey, 253 Mont. 85, 831 P. 2d 590 (1992)// [Электронный ресурс].-URL: https://www.courtlistener.com /opinion/1933709/goldberger- v-goldberger/

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载


##common.cookie##