Experience with the HIV protease inhibitor fosamprenavir in first-line antiretroviral therapy regimens in the Chelyabinsk Region


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Objective. To evaluate the efficiency and economic advisability of first-line antiretroviral therapy (ARVT) regimens including fosamprenavir and ritonavir (FPV/r) in a dose of1400/100 mg once daily in previously untreated patients. Subjects and methods. The data on 43 adult HIV-infected patients were retrospectively analyzed. The proportion of patients with undetectable viral load and the levels of CD4 lymphocytes were estimated at 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks; direct costs of test ARVT regimens were calculated. Results. The vast majority of patients achieved the undetectable level of viral load (HIV RNA < 150 copies/ml) just at 24 weeks of ARVT with FPV/r regardless of the prescribed nucleoside base. The maximum increment (+ 1158%) of CD4 lymphocyte count was noted in a group of patients receiving FPV/r in combination with abacavir/lamivudine (ABC/3TC). The ABC/3TC + FPV/r regimen proved to be more unprofitable; however, due to some benefits (once daily use, minimum pills load, favorable tolerability profile) it was optimal for patients in first-line ARVT. Conclusion. Once daily FPV/r in the first-line ARVT regimens showed its high efficiency irrespective of the used nucleoside base; the best immunological efficiency was demonstrated when FPV/r was taken in combination with ABC/3TC.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

M. Moskvicheva

South-Ural State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia

Email: fpdpo@mail.ru

M. Radzikhovskaya

Chelyabinsk Regional Center for the Prevention and Control of AIDS and Infectious Diseases

Email: rita-rad@mail.ru

Bibliografia

  1. Mallolas J., Blanco J.L., Pich J., Arnaizb J., Penac J., Dalmaud D. et al. A randomized trial comparing the efficacy and toler-ability of two HAART strategies at two years in antiretroviral naive patients. Rev. Clin. Esp. 2007; 207(9): 427-432.
  2. MacArthur R.D., Novak R.M., Peng G., Chen L., Xiang Y., Hullsiek K. et al. A comparison of three highly active antiretroviral treatment strategies consisting of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, or both in the presence of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as initial therapy (CPCRA 058 FIRST Study): a long-term randomised trial. Lancet 2006; 368(9553): 2125-2135.
  3. Bartlett J.A., Fath M.J., Demasi R., Hermes A., Quinn J., Mondou E. et al. An updated systematic overview of triple combination therapy in antiretroviralnaive HIV-infected adults. AIDS 2006; 20(16): 2051-2064.
  4. Riddler S.A., Haubrich R., DiRienzo A.G., Peeples L., Powderly W., Klingman K. et al. Class-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008; 358: 2095-2106.
  5. Pulido F., Estrada V., Baril J.G., Logue K., Schewe K., Plettenberg A. et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of Fosamprenavir plus Ritonavir versus Lopinavir/Ritonavir in combination with Abacavir/Lamivudine over 144 weeks. HIV Clin. Trials 2009; 10(2): 76-87.
  6. Walmsley S., Avihingsanon A., Slim J., Ward D., Ruxrungtham K., Brunetta J. et al. Gemini: a noninferiority study of saquinavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir as initial HIV-1 therapy in adults. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2009; 50(4): 367-374.
  7. Molina J., Andrade-Villanueva J., Echevarria J., Chetchotisakd P., Corral J., David N. et al. Once-daily Atazanavir/Ritonavir compared with twice-daily Lopinavir/Ritonavir, each in combination with Tenofovir and Emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2010; 53(3): 323-332.
  8. Ortiz R., Dejesus E., Khanlou H., Voronin E., van Lunzen J., Andrade-Villanueva J. et al. Efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients at week 48. AIDS 2008; 22: 1389-1397.
  9. Calza L., Manfredi R., Pocaterra D., Chiodo F. Efficacy and tolerability of a fosamprenavir-ritonavir-based versus a lopina-virritonavir-based antiretroviral treatment in 82 therapy-nave patients with HIV-1 infection. International Journal of STD & AIDS 2008; 19: 541-544.
  10. Hicks C., DeJesus E., Sloan L., Sension M.G., Wohl D.A., Liao Q. et al. Comparison of once-daily Fosamprenavir boosted with either 100 or 200 mg of Ritonavir, in combination with Abacavir/Lamivudine: 96-week results from COL100758. AIDS Res. Hum. Retroviruses 2009; 25(4): 395-403.
  11. Cohen C., DeJesus E., LaMarca A., Young B., Yau L., Patel L. et al. Similar virologic and immunologic efficacy with fosam-prenavir boosted with 100 mg or 200 mg of ritonavir in HIV-infected patients: results of the LESS trial. HIV Clin. Trials. 2010; 11(5): 239-247.
  12. Smith K., Weinberg W., DeJesus E., Fischl M., Liao Q., Ross L. et al. Fosamprenavir or atazanavir once daily boosted with ritonavir 100mg, plus tenofovir/emtricitabine, for the initial treatment of HIV infection: 48-week results of ALERT. AIDS Res. Ther. 2008. doi: 10.1186/1742-6405-5-5
  13. EACS Guidelines. October 2013. http://www.europeanaid-sclinicalsocity.org
  14. DHHS Guidelines. February 2013. http://www.aidsinfo.nih. gov/guidelines
  15. Покровский В.В., Юрин О.Г., Кравченко А.В., Беляева В.В., Канестри В.Г., Афонина Л.Ю. и др. Протоколы диспансерного наблюдения и лечения больных ВИЧ-инфекцией. Эпидемиол. инфекц. болезни. Актуал. вопр. 2013; 6, приложение.
  16. Мазус А.И., Каминский Г.Д., Зимина В.Н., Бессараб Т.П., Пронин А.Ю., Цыганова Е.В. и др. Национальные клинические рекомендации по диагностике и лечению ВИЧ-инфекции у взрослых. М., 2013. 68 с.
  17. Лисицын Ю.П. Общественное здоровье и здравоохранение: учебник. Раздел 6. Теоретические и методологические основы статистики. 2-е изд. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2010. 512 с.
  18. DeJesus E., Herrera G., Teofilo E., Gerstoft J., Buendia C.B., Brand J.D. et al. Abacavir versus zidovudine combined with lamivudine and efavirenz, for the treatment of antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected adults. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004; 39(7): 1038-1046.
  19. Sullivan P., Hanson D., Chu S., Jones J.L., Ward J.W. Epidemiology of anemia in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons: results from the multistate adult and adolescent spectrum of HIV disease surveillance project. Blood 1998; 91: 301-308.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2014

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies