The efficacy and safety of a new Russian HIV non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (VM-1500, Elpivirine) as a component in an antiretroviral therapy regimen


Citar

Texto integral

Acesso aberto Acesso aberto
Acesso é fechado Acesso está concedido
Acesso é fechado Acesso é pago ou somente para assinantes

Resumo

Objective. To evaluate the impact of different dosage regimens of VM-1500 in combination with drugs used for standard antiretroviral therapy (ART) versus a combination containing efavirenz (EFV) and standard ART (2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs/HtRTs)) on the efficiency of treatment in view of a reduction in viral load to an undetectable level (< 50 copies/ml) at 24 weeks in previously untreated HIV-1-infectedpatients. Subjects and methods. Study Stage 1 included 90 HIV-1-infected patients who had not previously received ART and were randomized into 3 groups at a 1:1:1 ratio: 1) VM-150 20 mg daily; 2) VM-150 40 mg daily; 3) EFV 600 mg daily (a comparison group). All the patients also took TDF/FTC. At this study stage, an interim analysis of the efficiency and safety of therapy was performed after 12-week therapy. Results. The 12-week ART regimen including VM-1500 at doses of 20 and 40 mg in combination with TDF/FTC was as effective as the EFV + TDF/FTC regimen regardless of the baseline level of HIV RNA. The proportion of patients with a HIV RNA level of < 400 copies/ml was highest in Group 1 and amounted to 93.3%, which was 11.8% below that in Group 3 (MIIT analysis). In Group 1, the incidence of all moderate (26.7%) and severe (6.7%) adverse events (AEs) was lowest as compared to that in Group 3 (60.7 and 14.3%, respectively). AEs of special interest (impairments of the central nervous system and mental activity) were substantially rarer in Groups 1 and 2 than in Group 3 (57.1%). Conclusion. There is evidence for the comparable (equivalent) efficiency of both VM-1500 doses and EFV as a component of ART. The safety of 12-week ART regimens incorporating VM-1500 was higher than that of the regimen containing EFV. VM-1500 20 mg daily was chosen to be further investigated.

Texto integral

Acesso é fechado

Sobre autores

A. Kravchenko

Central Research Institute of Epidemiology, Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare

Email: kravtchenko@hivmssia.net
Moscow

E. Orlova-Morozova

Moscow Regional Center for Prevention and Control of AIDS and Infectious Diseases

Email: orlovamorozova@gmail.com

T. Shimonova

infectious Diseases Hospital Two, Moscow Healthcare Department

O. Kozyrev

Volgograd Regional Center for Prevention and Control of AIDS and Infectious Diseases

Email: volghiv@mail.ru

F. Nagimova

Republican Center for Prevention and Control of AIDS and Infectious Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Tatarstan

Email: nagimova@list.ru
Kazan

V. Bychko

OOO «Viriom»

Email: vbichko@viriom.com
Khimki, Moscow Region

N. Vostokova

OOO «INFARMA»

Email: nv@ipharma.ru
Khimki, Moscow Region

O. Zozulya

OOO «INFARMA»

Email: ovz@ipharma.ru
Khimki, Moscow Region

Bibliografia

  1. Guidelinesfor the Clinical Management and Treatment of HIV-infected Adults in Europe (Version 7.1; November, 2014). European AIDS Clinical Society. http://www.eacsociety.net
  2. Guidelinesfor the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents. Developed by the Panel on Clinical Practices for Treatment of HIV Infection convened by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). April 8, 2015. http:// www. AIDSinfo.nih.gov
  3. Cohen C., Andrade-Villanueva J., Clotet B., Fourie J., Johnson M.A., Ruxrungtham K., Wu H., Zorrilla C., Crauwels H., Rimsky L.T., Vanveggel S., Boven K. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2011; 378(9787): 229- 237. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60983-5
  4. Molina J-M., Cahn P., Grinsztejn B., Lazzarin A., Mills A., Saag M., Supparatpinyo K., Walmsley S., Crauwels H., Rimsky L.T., Vanveggel S., Boven K., on behalf of the ECHO study group. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with tenofovir and emtricitabine in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (ECHO): a phase 3 randomised double-blind active-controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 378(9787): 238-246. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60936-7.
  5. Канестри В.Г., Кравченко А.В., Ганкина Н.Ю. Гепатотоксичность антиреровирусной терапии больных ВИЧ-инфекцией. Эпидемиол. инфекц. болезни. Актуал. вопр. 2015; 1: 31-36.
  6. Ratanasuwan W., Werarak P., Murphy R.L., Bichko V. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study ofVM-1500 in HIV-naïve patients. The Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infectious (CROI), Boston, MA, USA, 2014: Abstr. 544LB.

Arquivos suplementares

Arquivos suplementares
Ação
1. JATS XML

Declaração de direitos autorais © Bionika Media, 2015

Este site utiliza cookies

Ao continuar usando nosso site, você concorda com o procedimento de cookies que mantêm o site funcionando normalmente.

Informação sobre cookies