On Verification, Calibration of Instruments, Certification of Methods and Reliability of the Results of Chemical Analytical Measurements

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The main ways to achieve the reliability (unity) of measurement results, according to existing regulations, are mainly related to the verification of instruments, their calibration or reproduction of metrologically certified measurement methods. When it comes to measuring the amount of a substance, traditional approaches are not always optimal. So, for specific analyzers, a number of electrochemical devices, etc. verification is a completely justified and necessary element of obtaining reliable measurement results. When reproducing (or developing) methods implemented on universal devices, first of all, we should talk about constructing calibration characteristics (specific for each specific substance), observing sample preparation regimes, etc. In this case, the feasibility of verifying the device becomes at least questionable. Obtaining adequate results is largely influenced by the availability and use of appropriate calibration means: reference materials (pure substances or solutions), means of monitoring the obtained data –  matrix type RM, as well as certified measurement techniques. Thus, in the field of chemical- analytical measurements, there is a need to revise the list of instruments subject to mandatory verification, and at the same time, it is advisable to more actively develop the direction of work to significantly expand the list of reference materials, including matrix-type reference materials.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

A. I. Krylov

ФГУП «Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт метрологии им. Д. И. Менделеева»

Author for correspondence.
Email: a.i.krylov@vniim.ru

доктор химических наук

 

Russian Federation, Санкт-Петербург

E. R. Lazarenko

ФГУП «Всероссийский научно-исследовательский институт метрологии им. Д. И. Менделеева»

Email: a.i.krylov@vniim.ru
Russian Federation, Санкт-Петербург

References

  1. Federal Law № 103–FZ of 26.06.2008 On Ensuring the Uniformity of measurements (as amended on June 11, 2021).
  2. Order of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation № 4091 dated 15.12.2015 On approval of the Procedure for certification of primary reference Measurement Techniques (methods), reference measurement techniques (methods) and measurement techniques (methods) and their application.
  3. Order of the Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Russian Federation № 2905 of 28.08.2020 “On Approval of the Procedure for Testing Standard Samples for Measuring Instruments for the Purpose of Type Approval, the Procedure for approving the Type of Standard Samples or the type of Measuring Instruments, Making Changes to the Information about them, the Procedure for Issuing certificates of approval of the type of standard samples or the type of measuring Instruments, the form of certificates of approval type of standard samples or type of measuring instruments, requirements for the approval marks of the type of standard samples or the type of measuring instruments and the order of their application.
  4. Boldyrev I. V. Draft of the new Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation. Who is to blame and what to do? Analytics. 2020; 10 (3): 244–250.
  5. Boldyrev I. V. Accreditation is an objective way to reliable and reliable test results. Analytics. 2022; 12 (2): 96–101.
  6. Novikov E. A. How to ensure the unity of measurements. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2012; 67 (12): 1091–1096.
  7. Novikov E. A. So what is a “measuring instrument”? Analytics. 2021; 11 (5): 396–400.
  8. Konopelko L. A., Kadis R. L. Chemical analytical measurement – new challenges. In Proceeding Modern metrology of physical-chemical measurement (Ed. A. N. Pronin). SPb, 2022. PP. 29–56.
  9. General Conference for Weights and Measures (CGPM), Resolution 1 of 26 meeting of CGPM (13–16 November 2018), available at: https://www.bipm.org/en/committees/cg/cgpm/26-2018/resolution-1 (accessed: 23.06.21).
  10. Marquardt R., Meija J., Mester Z., et. al. Definition of the mole (IU-PAC Recommendation 2017), Pure Appl. Chem., 2018; 90 (1): 175–180.
  11. Bernd Guttler, Horst Bettin, Richard J. C. Brown, et.al. Amount of substance and the mole in the SI, Metrologia. 2019; 56 (044002). 14p. doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/ab1fae
  12. Description of the type of measuring instruments. Mercury analyzers laboratory RA-915M. FGIS Arshin. https://fgis.gost.ru/fundmetrology/registry/4/items/372534. Аccessed: 24.04.2023.
  13. Description of the type of measuring instruments. Mercury analyzers laboratory RA-915 Lab. FGIS Arshin. https://fgis.gost.ru/fundmetrology/registry/4/items/1388370. Аccessed: 24.04.2023.
  14. RMI VNIIM-243-01-2019. Reference method for measuring the mass fraction of six priority phthalates (dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate, di(n-butyl)phthalate, benzylbutyl phthalate, di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and di(n-octyl)phthalate) in polyvinyl chloride-based objects by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with isotopic dilution https://fgis.gost.ru/fundmetrology/registry/8/items/834820. Аccessed:12.07.2023.
  15. Method of measuring the mass concentration of ammonium ions in drinking, natural (including marine) and wastewater by photometric method with Nessler reagent. PND F 14.1:2:4.262–10 (FR.1.31.2010.07603) FGIS Arshin. https://fgis.gost.ru/fundmetrology/registry/4/items/288047. Аccessed:24.04.2023.
  16. Krylov A. I., Budko A. G., Mikheeva A. Y., Tkachenko I. Y., Nezhikhovsky G. R. Reference method for content measurement of phthalates in polymeric matrixes: analytical and metrological approaches. Measurement technique 2022; (10): 64–72. doi.org/10.32446/0368-1025it.2022-10-64-72.
  17. Westwood S., Lippa K., Shimuzu Yo., et.al. Methods for the SI-traceable value assignment of the purity of organic compounds (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem. 2023; 95 (1): 1–77. doi.org/10.1515/pac-2020–0804.
  18. Mikheeva A. Y., Krylov A. I. Tracebility in organic analysis. Report 1: Equivalence of national and international measurement standards, Measurement standards, reference materials. 2020; 16 (3): 5–21. doi: 10.20915/2687-0886-2020-16-3-5-21.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig.1.

Download (295KB)

Copyright (c) 2023 Krylov A.I., Lazarenko E.R.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies