Surgical rehabilitation of hearing in children with chronic suppurative otitis media.

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

BACKGROUND: Tympanoplasty is mainly indicated for the surgical debridement of the middle ear and the creation of a closed tympanic cavity and a mobile and functional sound transmission system.

AIM: This study aimed to analyze the state of hearing according to pure tone threshold audiometry before and after hearing-improving operations in children.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study analyzed the hearing state according to pure tone threshold audiometry data before and after tympanoplasty in 65 children aged 5–17 years. Hearing status was assessed before surgery and on 18–21 days and 6–12 months after surgery. The patients underwent tympanoplasty types I, II, and III according to H. Wullstein. To close the tympanic membrane defect, restore the lateral wall of the attic, and replenish the elements of the chain of auditory ossicles, the following materials were used: perichondrium of the tragus and auricle, cartilage of the tragus and auricle, perichondrial–cartilaginous flaps, and periosteum.

RESULTS: In this study, patients’ satisfaction rates of the anatomical and functional results of tympanoplasty were 86% and 78%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: Cartilaginous ossiculoplasty was performed on the head of stapes and oval window, and a perichondrial–cartilaginous flap was used to form the tympanic membrane. This method was effective in creating a sound-conducting system of the middle ear in children.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Galina Vlasova

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: galinav71@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4070-2835

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor

俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg

Pavel Pavlov

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: pvpavlov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4626-201X

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)

俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg

Alina Gaiduenko

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

Email: linagaid06@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-3780-5827

clinical resident

俄罗斯联邦, Saint Petersburg

参考

  1. Vlasova GV, Karimov ASh. Features of surgical findings in tympanoplasty in children. Folia Otorhinolaryngologiae et Pathologiae Respiratoriae. 2022;28(4):32–37. EDN: GFPQNQ doi: 10.33848/foliorl23103825-2022-28-4-32-37
  2. Lyulko VK, Marchenko VM. Atlas of ear operations. Kiev: Zdorov’ya; 1989. 216 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Neudert M, Zahnert T. Tympanoplasty – news and new perspectives. Laryngorhinootologie. 2017;96(S01):S66–S83. (In German) doi: 10.1055/s-0042-120048
  4. Preciado DA, Levine SC. A review of type 3 tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1999;32(3):401–411. doi: 10.1016/s0030-6665(05)70142-0
  5. Velepic M, Starcevic R, Ticac R, et al. Cartilage palisade tympanoplasty in children and adults: long term results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76(5):663–666. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.01.036
  6. Sarkar S, Roychoudhury A, Roychaudhuri BK. Tympanoplasty in children. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;266(5):627–633. doi: 10.1007/s00405-008-0908-1
  7. Verma N, Goyal A, Gupta N. Hearing outcomes in pediatric tympanoplasty and factors affecting surgical outcomes in the current era. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;171:111634. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111634
  8. Simon F, Thierry B, Rabeony T, et al. Long-term outcomes of cartilage tympanoplasty in 139 ears in children. Clin Otolaryngol. 2021;46(6):1395–1399. doi: 10.1111/coa.13801
  9. Ribeiro JC, Rui C, Natercia S, et al. Tympanoplasty in children: a review of 91 cases. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2011;38(1):21–25. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2010.05.004
  10. Shamshudinov T, Kassym L, Taukeleva S, et al. Tympanoplasty and adenoidectomy in children: Comparison of simultaneous and sequential approaches. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0265133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265133
  11. Zwierz A, Haber K, Sinkiewicz A, et al. The significance of selected prognostic factors in pediatric tympanoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(2):323–333. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5193-z
  12. Riss JC, Roman S, Morredu E, et al. Butterfly-cartilage tympanoplasty in children: a 28-case series and literature review. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016;133(3):179–182. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2016.02.004
  13. Gün T, Boztepe OF, Atan D, et al. A comparison of cartilage palisades and temporal fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty for bilateral tympanic membrane perforations in children. J Int Adv Otol. 2017;13(1):36–39. doi: 10.5152/iao.2016.1855
  14. Albirmawy OA. Comparison between cartilage-perichondrium composite ‘ring’ graft and temporalis fascia in type one tympanoplasty in children. J Laryngol Otol. 2010;124(9):967–974. doi: 10.1017/S0022215110000885
  15. Ozbek C, Ciftçi O, Tuna EE, et al. A comparison of cartilage palisades and fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty in children: anatomic and functional results. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(5):679–683. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31817dad57
  16. Nevoux J, Roger G, Chauvin P, et al. Cartilage shield tympanoplasty in children: review of 268 consecutive cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011;137(1):24–29. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.229
  17. Attallah MS. Tympanoplasty in children – our experience in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Otolaryngol Pol. 1994;48(5):441–444.
  18. Hardman J, Muzaffar J, Nankivell P, Coulson C. Tympanoplasty for chronic tympanic membrane perforation in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36(5):796–804. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000767
  19. Baklaci D, Guler I, Kuzucu I, et al. Type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: a review of 102 cases. BMC Pediatr. 2018;18(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1326-1

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载