On the Concept and Objective Attributes of the National Interests

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The relevance of the subject matter in this article can be attributed to the growing interest in both scientific papers and legal acts. Despite the widespread use of this concept, there is no consensus in legal science regarding its precise definition or content.

The purpose of this article is to develop scientific provisions that reflect the patterns of development and functioning of the state’s national interests. Thus, while developing this article, the author set the following principles: to define the concept of national interests, describe the stages of their definition, identify the objective properties of national interests, and reveal the characteristic features of the reflection of national interests in the strategic acts of the Russian Federation.

However, while studying national interests, the dialectical method of cognition was used as a philosophical basis, as well as general scientific research methods such as ascending from the abstract to the concrete and the system-structural method. Additionally, specific scientific methods such as formal-legal were applied, and logical tools for knowledge, including analysis, synthesis, deduction, and induction.

As a result, the following conclusions were drawn:

1) national interests can be defined as the basis on which a state’s foreign and domestic policies are implemented; 2) when describing national interests, it is important to consider the interests of society; 3) to assess the national interest, it seems possible to note several objective properties such as social significance, sustainability, and reality; 4) within the strategic documents of the Russian Federation relating to national interests, there is an indication that the goal of realizing national interests, is to protect the constitutional rights and freedoms of individuals and citizens. These statements can be considered a benchmark against which specific decisions should be evaluated and assessed. This article was described within the framework of the Russian Science Foundation project No. 23-28-01457 “Vectors for the development of law-making in the implementation of certain interests of Russia: problems and prospects”.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Dina R. Alimova

Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: paygina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-6029-2610
SPIN-code: 1139-6320

senior research fellow, candidate of legal sciences

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Turanin VY. National interests: approaches to the definition of the concept. Rossiiskaya yustitsiya. 2021;(1):2–7. (In Russ.). doi: 10.18572/0131-6761-2021-1-2-7
  2. Letuta TV, Maksimenko EI. Natsional’nye interesy i ehkonomicheskaya bezopasnost’ v ramkakh EAEU. Bezopasnost’ biznesa. 2022;(4):7–10. (In Russ.).
  3. Belyaev VP, Bidova BB. Sushchnost’ natsional’nykh interesov: obshcheteoreticheskii aspect. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2020;15(7):11–21. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.116.7.011-021
  4. Malinova AG. «Interes» kak ponyatie pravovedeniya: problemy doktrinal’nogo opredeleniya. Rossiiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2021;(2):29–42. (In Russ.).
  5. Miloserdov NA. Public interests in law: concept and content. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2021;16(10):202–211. (In Russ.). doi: 10.17803/1994-1471.2021.131.10.202-211
  6. Ul’yanov AYu. Zashchita prokuraturoi publichnykh interesov v sfere lesopol’zovaniya. Zakonnost’. 2022;(2):34–35. (In Russ.).
  7. Vavilin EV. Printsip sochetaniya chastnykh i obshchestvennykh interesov v zakonodatel’stve o tsifrovoi valyute. Yurist. 2022;(9): 54–57. (In Russ.).
  8. Vinogradov VA. Nekotorye voprosy otrazheniya publichnogo interesa v resheniyakh Konstitutsionnogo suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii. In: Interes v publichnom i chastnom prave: materialy nauchnoi konferentsii. Moskva, 21 noyabrya 2002 g. Ed. by Yu.A. Tikhomirov, G.V. Mal’tsev, B.V. Rossinskii. Moscow; 2002. 165 p. (In Russ.).
  9. Tikhomirov YuA. Interes v publichnom i chastnom prave: soglasovanie i protivoborstvo. In: Interes v publichnom i chastnom prave: materialy nauchnoi konferentsii. Moskva, 21 noyabrya 2002 g. Ed. by Yu.A. Tikhomirov, G.V. Mal’tsev, B.V. Rossinskii. Moscow; 2002. 165 p. (In Russ.).
  10. Chirkin VE. Lichnye, chastnye i publichnye interesy v sovremennykh konstitutsiyakh. In: Interesy v prave. Zhidkovskie chteniya. Moscow: RUDN; 2017. 633 p. (In Russ.).
  11. Obshchaya teoriya natsional’noi bezopasnosti. Ed. by A.A. Prokhozhev. Moscow: RAGS; 2005. 338 p. (In Russ.).
  12. Il’in MV. Kriterii sovremennosti v politike. Polis. 1995;(1):80–87. (In Russ.).
  13. Baranov VM. Destruktivnoe vozdeistvie prava i natsional’nye interesy. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava. 2005.;(12):84–87. (In Russ.).
  14. Alekseeva TA. Ratsional’nyi ehgoizm natsional’nogo interesa (Materialy kruglogo stola). Polis. 1995;(1):92–93. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies