Email this article 
Criminal Procedural Issues of Proving in Pre-trial Proceedings in Criminal Cases on Crimes Committed by Falsification of Debt Obligations
- Authors: Popov A.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
- Issue: Vol 10, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 107-114
- Section: Criminal law
- URL: https://journals.eco-vector.com/2410-7522/article/view/569032
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RJLS569032
- ID: 569032
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Abstract
In this article, the author addresses a rather specific issue – the peculiarities of compliance with the criminal procedural requirements for evidence in cases involving crimes committed through the use of debt obligations. This primarily concerns combattiting criminal behavior such as fraud, property-related offenses, and various illicit actions in bankruptcy cases. The public danger of such crimes is associated with a significant impact of their consequences on normal economic activity. Currently, civil and arbitration procedural laws do not grant judge, prosecutor, or other state representatives sufficient authority to uncover illegal actions or identify falsified evidence. The purpose of this article was to highlight the peculiarities of how criminal procedural legislation deals with cased involving falsification of obligations. Based on this study, the author formulated proposals for reforming criminal procedure law.
Full Text
About the authors
Alexey V. Popov
Academy of Management of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Author for correspondence.
Email: av060878@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-3862-1472
SPIN-code: 3477-5616
adjunct
Russian Federation, 8, st. Zoya and Alexandra Kosmodemyanskikh, 125171 MoscowReferences
- Tymoshenko AA, Feyzov VR, Chernov IV. Scenario approach to the study of the directions of regulation of the sphere of cryptocurrencies in the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Legal Studies (Moscow). 2023;10(2):20-30. doi: 10.17816/RJLS397536
- Bryukhanov MYu. Fal’sifikatsiya finansovoi otchetnosti: obnaruzhenie i predotvrashchenie [abstract dissertation]. Moscow; 2009. (In Russ.).
- Kholevchuk AG. Fal’sifikatsiya kak ob”ekt kriminalisticheskogo issledovaniya [abstract dissertation]. Moscow; 2010. (In Russ.).
- Muratov DA. Rassledovanie prestuplenii, sovershaemykh s ispol’zovaniem protsedur bankrotstva [abstract dissertation]. Nizhnii Novgorod; 2004. (In Russ.).
- Gavrilova NA. Metodika rassledovaniya prednamerennykh bankrotstv [abstract dissertation]. Moscow; 2017. (In Russ.).
- Zatsepin AM. Nepravomernye deistviya pri bankrotstve v ugolovnom prave: sotsial’naya obuslovlennost’ kriminalizatsii, problemy zakonodatel’noi reglamentatsii i kvalifikatsiic. Moscow; 2010. (In Russ.).
- Bondar’ AV. Moshennichestvo kak vid prestupnogo posyagatel’stva protiv sobstvennosti i osobennosti ego proyavleniya v sfere bankovskoi deyatel’nosti: ugolovno-pravovoi aspect [abstract dissertation]. 2003. (In Russ.).
- Didenko VB. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’ za nepravomernye deistviya pri bankrotstve [abstract dissertation]. Moscow; 2004. (In Russ.).
- Yamashkin SV. Organizovannoe moshennichestvo: ugolovno-pravovoi i kriminologicheskii aspekty [abstract dissertation]. Chelyabinsk; 2010. (In Russ.).
- Kuznetsov S.A. Bol’shoi tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo yazyka. Moscow: Kontrakt-Ifra; 2000. (In Russ.).
- Lopashenko NA. Prestupleniya v sfere ekonomicheskoi deyatel’nosti: ponyatie, sistema, problemy kvalifikatsii i nakazaniya. Saratov: Izdatel’stvo Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii prava; 1997. 256 p. (In Russ.).
- Safronov AYu, Polyakov VV. Problems of legal and linguistic definition of evidence tampering in criminal court procedure. Legal Linguistics. 2019:(12):13–17. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14258/leglin(2019)1203
- Alieva MM. Ugolovnaya otvetstvennost’ za prestupleniya, svyazannye s podlogom dokumentov [abstract dissertation]. Moscow; 2011. (In Russ.).
- Sluzhba usilit svoe vliyanie na povedenie finansovykh organizatsii [Interv’yu s O. Krainovoi]. Sovremennye strakhovye tekhnologii. 2021;(3):56–61. (In Russ.).
- Prozumentov L, Makhno M. Nepravomernye deistviya pri bankrotstve. Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009:(6):49–54. (In Russ.).
- Nabiullina RR, Tukhvatullin RSh. Fal’sifikatsiya finansovoi otchetnosti: istoricheskie aspekty i klassifikatsiya skhem fal’sifikatsii. Kazanskii ekonomicheskii vestnik. 2017;(5(31)):60–64.
- Khaupshev AKh, Tutukov AYu. Obman kak sposob soversheniya prestuplenii, svyazannykh s bankrotstvom. Obshchestvo i pravo. 2010:(4(31)):114–119. (In Russ.).
- Shakirova E. Poddelka podpisi v dolgovykh obyazatel’stvakh. Zhilishchnoe pravo. 2022;(12):89–96. (In Russ.).
- Ivanova EV. Expert techniques and their validation: concepts and criteria, some terminological inconsistencies. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2021;16(3):32–40. (In Russ.) doi: 10.30764/1819-2785-2021-3-32-40
- Kurovskaya LN, Timoshenko AA. Sistemnye problemy organizatsii negosudarstvennoi sudebnoi ekspertnoi deyatel’nosti. Zakonnost’. 2015;(9):55–59. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
