Features of the Protection of the Monetary System by Criminal Legal Means in Germany and France

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

The article analyzes the features of the criminal law protection of national monetary systems in Germany and France. Regarding the consolidation and development in the domestic legal field of additional means of criminal protection of the national monetary system, including the rules on liability for evading the obligation to repatriate funds and smuggling of cash, approaches to regulating the composition of currency crimes are considered basic for most jurisdictions (counterfeiting and money legalization). Thus, this article analyzes the approaches to the regulation of relevant structures and problems in law enforcement in Germany and France, considering their goal to introduce the most advanced solutions in the context of economic development and means of their criminal law protection, as well as the influence of their doctrine on the formation and development of many legal institutions abroad. These correspond to the evolutionary nature of social relations developing in this area in Russia, which have not yet been accepted in its legislation.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Denis A. Pechegin

The Institute of legislation and comparative law under the Government of the Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: crim5@izak.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6499-9966

candidate of legal sciences, leading researcher

Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Kucherov II. Valyutnoe pravo Rossii (akademicheskii kurs lektsii). Moscow: Yustitsinform, 2011. 230 p. (In Russ.).
  2. Lisitsyn AYu. Valyutno-pravovoi rezhim v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Reformy i pravo. 2010;(1):3–12. (In Russ.).
  3. Lisitsyn AYu. Effektivnost’ sistemy valyutno-pravovogo regulirovaniya vneshnetorgovoi deyatel’nosti. Reformy i pravo. 2010;(4): 7–10. (In Russ.).
  4. Ugolovno-pravovaya okhrana finansovo-byudzhetnoi sfery: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie. Ed. by I.I. Kucherov, O.A. Zaitsev, S.L. Nudel’. Moscow: Institut zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya pri Pravitel’stve Rossiiskoi Federatsii: OOO «Yuridicheskaya firma Kontrakt»; ٢٠٢١. (In Russ.).
  5. Ansel’ M. Metodologicheskie problemy sravnitel’nogo prava. In: Ocherki sravnitel’nogo prava. Moscow: Progress; 1981. P. 37–71. (In Russ.).
  6. David R, Zhoffre-Spinozi K. Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya; 1999. (In Russ.).
  7. Kucherov II. Sovremennoe sostoyanie ugolovno-pravovoi zashchity sfery valyutnogo regulirovaniya. Rossiiskii sledovatel’. 2011;(1):23–26. (In Russ.).
  8. Ekonomicheskaya bezopasnost’ (ugolovno-pravovye mekhanizmy obespecheniya). Ed by I.I. Kucherov, O.A. Zaitsev, S.L. Nudel’. Moscow: OOO «Yuridicheskaya firma Kontrakt»; 2021. (In Russ.).
  9. Nudel SL. Modernization of criminal policy: problems of legal regulation. Journal of Russian Law. 2023;(1):5–22. (In Russ.). doi: 10.12737/jrp.2023.001
  10. Ensenbach K. Strafrechtsschutz von Komplementärwährungen. JA. 2011;(341):341–345.
  11. Golovnenkov PV. Ugolovnoe ulozhenie Federativnoi Respubliki Germaniya – Strafgesetzbuch (StGB) – Nauchnye trudy v oblasti nemetskogo i rossiiskogo ugolovnogo prava. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam; 2021. (In Russ.). doi: 10.25932/publishup-47371
  12. Maile A., Pershin A. Otvetstvennost’ za poddelku denezhnykh znakov i znakov oplaty po UK FRG. Ugolovnoe pravo. 2009;(5):42–45. (In Russ.).
  13. Golovnenkov P. Ugolovnoe ulozhenie (Ugolovnyi kodeks) Federativnoi Respubliki Germaniya: nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii i perevod teksta zakona. Moscow: Prospekt; 2015. (In Russ.).
  14. Khell’mann U. Evropeizatsiya ugolovnogo prava v Germanii. In: Prestupleniya v sfere ehkonomiki: rossiiskii i evropeiskii opyt. Materialy II sovmestnogo rossiisko-germanskogo kruglogo stola (9 oktyabrya 2009 g.). Moscow: MGYUA imeni O.E. Kutafina; 2009.(In Russ.).
  15. Zhubrin RV. Kriminologicheskaya obosnovannost’ ugolovnoi otvetstvennosti za legalizatsiyu prestupnykh dokhodov. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika. 2013;(10):39–47. (In Russ.).
  16. Ruhmannseder F. Kommentar zum Strafgesetzbuch von Heintschel-Heinegg B. Munchen, 2010. § ٢٦١ Rn 1. (In Ger.).
  17. Gribov AS. Osobennosti differentsiatsii otvetstvennosti za ehkonomicheskie prestupleniya v ugolovnom prave Rossii, FRG i SSHA. Moscow: Yurlitinform; ٢٠١٣. (In Russ.).
  18. Graber CK. Geldwäscherei: Ein Kommentar zu Art ٣٠٥bis und ٣٠٥ter StGB. Bern: Stämpfli Verlag; ١٩٩٠. (In Ger.).
  19. Volzhenkin BV. Otmyvanie deneg: Seriya «Sovremennye standarty v ugolovnom prave i ugolovnom protsesse». Saint Petersburg; 1998. (In Russ.).
  20. Laue K. Grazhdansko-pravovaya otvetstvennost’ bankov v raschetnykh pravootnosheniyakh po zakonodatel’stvu Germanii i Rossiiskoi Federatsii (sravnitel’no-pravovoi aspekt). Ed. by L.G. Efimov. Moscow: Prospekt; 2017. (In Russ.).
  21. Zhalinskii AEh. Sovremennoe nemetskoe ugolovnoe pravo. Moscow: Prospekt; 2006. (In Russ.).
  22. Kerner KhKh, Dakh Eh. Otmyvanie deneg: putevoditel’ po deistvuyushchemu zakonodatel’stvu i yuridicheskoi praktik. Ed. by A.Eh. Zhalinskii. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya; 1996. (In Russ.).
  23. Carl D, Klos J. Regelungen zur Bekaempfung der Geldwaesche. Heidelberg: Schmidt Erich Verlag, 1998. (In Ger.).
  24. Vlasov IS, Vlasova NV, Golovanova NA. Otvetstvennost’ za otmyvanie (legalizatsiyu) korruptsionnykh dokhodov po zakonodatel’stvu zarubezhnykh gosudarstv, Ed. by A.Ya. Kapustin, A.M. Tsirin. Moscow: NITS INFRA-M; 2017. (In Russ.).
  25. Stepchenko KYu. Sravnitel’nyi analiz otechestvennogo i zarubezhnogo ugolovnogo zakonodatel’stva v oblasti bor’by s fal’shivomonetnichestvom. Otechestvennaya yurisprudentsiya. 2016;(10):36–39. (In Russ.).
  26. Martsopoulou H. Chronique de jurisprudence: Infractions contre les biens. Revue de Science Criminelle et de Droit Pénal Comparé. 2012;(4):865–869. (In Fr.).
  27. Men’shikh AA. Criminal responsibility for illegal money laundering under french legislation. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya. 2015;(4):684–690. (In Russ.).
  28. Bukarev VB, Truntsevskii YuV, Shulepov NA. Zarubezhnyi opyt v sfere pravovogo regulirovaniya protivodeistviya legalizatsii (otmyvaniyu) dokhodov, priobretennykh prestupnym putem. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo. 2007;(4):53–55.
  29. Pradel J, Danti-Juan M. Manuel de droit pénal special. Paris: Cujas, 2001. (In Fr.).
  30. Jeandidier W. Droit pénal des affaires. Paris: Dalloz, 2003. (In Fr.).

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Number of counterfeit banknotes detected annually per million genuine banknotes in circulation in the Euro area

Download (126KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2023 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies