Acts of Entities Involved in Disciplinary Charges Against Civil Servants

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Abstract

This article presents a legal analysis of external methods for limiting discretion in the process of holding civil servants accountable for disciplinary violations. This article addresses the application of acts by various entities involved in disciplinary proceedings, such as prosecutor’s submissions, and decisions issued by control and accounting bodies, authorized officials, and other relevant authorities. The findings suggest that the scope of entities involved in disciplinary charges must be clearly defined under disciplinary service legislation. Additionally, the authority of these entities to issue and transmit acts mandating the consideration of disciplinary liability should be codified into sectoral laws.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Yulia B. Nosova

Voronezh State University

Author for correspondence.
Email: yulia_sh81@mail.ru
SPIN-code: 1894-3535

candidate of legal sciences, associate professor

Russian Federation, Voronezh

References

  1. Adushkin YuS. Disciplinary proceedings in the USSR / ed. by V.M. Manokhin. Saratov: Publishing house of Saratov Univresity, 1986. (In Russ.)
  2. Karpov NN. Theoretical and applied problems of the activities of the prosecutor’s office to ensure the rule of law in the field of military service (dissertation abstract). Moscow, 2012. (In Russ.)
  3. Torgovchenkov VI, Kochetygova IS. Bringing to disciplinary liability at the request of the prosecutor. Bulletin of the University of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Russian Federation. 2019;(1):29–33. (In Russ.) EDN: ZEETRR
  4. Vinokurov AYu. On some issues related to the application of the concept of eliminating violations of the law. In: Problems of ensuring legality, law and order and public safety in modern conditions: collection of materials from a scientific and practical conference, September 22, 2016. Simferopol: Arial, 2016. P. 84–93. (In Russ.)
  5. Usov AYu. On the powers of the prosecutor to initiate disciplinary proceedings. Law and Politics. 2023;(10):15–23. (In Russ.) EDN: UGMOFI doi: 10.7256/2454-0706.2023.10.68746
  6. Mamatov MV, Kremneva EV. The prosecutor’s demand for disciplinary action in reflection of judicial practice. Legality. 2018;(2):23–28. (In Russ.) EDN: XMFRPF
  7. Filipenko SV. Issues of bringing government employees to disciplinary liability based on the prosecutor’s presentation. Legality. 2021;(5):8–11. (In Russ.) EDN: AQUKKE
  8. Dobrobaba MB, Presnyakov MV, Channov SE. Disciplinary responsibility: legal mechanisms for ensuring efficiency in the public service system. Moscow: Norma; 2023. (In Russ.) EDN: RNCNBF doi: 10.12737/1983245
  9. Cherkasov KV. «Personnel decide everything», or some aspects of the implementation of personnel powers of the President of Russia at the local level. State Power and Local Self-government. 2011;(5):22–26. (In Russ.) EDN: NVYWGD

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2024 Eco-Vector



СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС77-76621 от 06.09.2019