Categories of “integration” and “disintegration” in international law: modern conceptual approaches

封面


如何引用文章

全文:

开放存取 开放存取
受限制的访问 ##reader.subscriptionAccessGranted##
受限制的访问 订阅或者付费存取

详细

The importance of the category of “integration” in the modern system of international relations can hardly be overestimated. The science of international law is no exception, and its development has recently been largely conditioned by the ongoing integration processes between states, the main subjects of international law. The very international legal doctrine has developed many approaches to the characteristics of its essential characteristics, including integration. Despite the objective nature of integration, its development in the context recent disintegration events that have taken place in the international arena and given rise to crisis phenomena (the first of which is, of course, the process of Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union), predetermine the relevance as well as the theoretical and practical significance of this article. The methodological basis of the work includes well-known general and specific methods of scientific research. The purpose and objectives of the article are to study the relevant problems and the essence of integration and disintegration processes in the international arena, characterize the main doctrinal approaches to them, and identify general trends as well as the essential characteristics and main features of these phenomena.

全文:

受限制的访问

作者简介

Dmitriy Galushko

Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: galushkodv@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9301-9565
SPIN 代码: 1710-5918

Candidate of legal sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Legal Regulation of Economic Activities

俄罗斯联邦

参考

  1. Sideri S. Globalisation and Regional Integration. Eur J Dev Res. 1997;9(1):38-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09578819708426677.
  2. Tihomirov Ju.A. Celi i formy gosudarstvenno-pravovoj integracii. [Aims and forms of state and legal intregration] Pravovoe obespechenie mezhgosudarstvennoj integracii. Sbornik statej. 2005:4-31. (In Russ.).
  3. Smend R. Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht. Munchen: Duncker&Humblot, 1928.
  4. Kelsen H. Der Staat als Integration: Eine prinzipielle Auseinandersetzung. Vienna: Springer, 1930.
  5. Spenser G. Osnovnye nachala. [Basic principles] Saint-Petersburg: Al'faret, 2016. (In Russ.).
  6. Giddens Je. Ustroenie obshhestva: Ocherk teorii strukturacii. [Organization of society: Essay on the theory of structuration] Moscow: Akademicheskij Proekt, 2005. (In Russ.).
  7. Haas E. The Uniting of Europe. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1958.
  8. Gonidec P.-F., Charvin R. Relations Internationales. Paris, 1984.
  9. Etzioni A. Political Unification: A Comparative Study of Leaders and Forces. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1965.
  10. Baranovskij V.G. Politicheskaja integracija v Zapadnoj Evrope. Nekotorye voprosy teorii i praktiki. [Political integration in Western Europe. Some questions of theory and practice] Moscow: Nauka, 1983. (In Russ.).
  11. Sartori D. Iskazhenie konceptov v sravnitel'noj politologii (III). [Distortion of concepts in comparative political science] Polis. Politicheskie issledovanija. 2003;(5):65-75. (In Russ.).
  12. Deutsch K. Analysis of International Relations. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
  13. Deutsch K. National Integration: Some Concepts and Research Approaches. Jerusalem Journal of International Relations, 1977;2(1):1-29.
  14. Wiener A., Diez Th. European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  15. Vollaard H. Explaining European Disintegration. Journal of Common Market Studies. 2014;(52):1142-1159. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12132.
  16. Haas E. The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joys and Anguish of Pretheorizing. In: Lindberg L.N., Scheingold S.A., editors. Regional Integration: Theory and Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971. P. 3-42.
  17. Webber D. How likely is it that the European Union will disintegrate? A critical analysis of competing theoretical perspectives. European Journal of International Relations. 2014;20(2):341-365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066112461286.
  18. Hirschman A.O. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.
  19. Bartolini S. Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199286434.001.0001.
  20. Leuffen D., Rittberger B., Schimmelfennig F. Differentiated Integration: Explaining Variation in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
  21. Taylor P. The End of European Integration. London: Routledge, 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203935682.
  22. Haas E.B. Collective Security and the Future International System. Denver, CO: University of Colorado Press, 1968.
  23. Lindberg L.N., Scheingold S.A. Europe’s Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.
  24. Mattli W. Ernst Haas's evolving thinking on comparative regional integration: of virtues and infelicities. Journal of European Public Policy. 2005;12(2):327-348. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500044157.
  25. Rosamond B. Theories of European Integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.
  26. Mearsheimer J.J. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security. 1990;15(1):5-56.
  27. Rosato S. Europe's Troubles: Power Politics and the State of the European Project. International Security. 2011;35(4):45-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00035.
  28. Lundestad G. ‘Empire’ by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945–1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
  29. Karvonen L. Europe's Spaces and Boundaries. Comparative European Politics. 2007;(5):441–460. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110115.
  30. Jones E. Towards a theory of disintegration. Journal of European Public Policy. 2008;25(3):440-451. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1411381.

补充文件

附件文件
动作
1. JATS XML
下载

版权所有 © Eco-Vector, 2020

许可 URL: https://eco-vector.com/en/for_authors.php#07

##common.cookie##